Bombshell – Russia, FBI, Uranium and Clinton Bribery Plot

 

Why this isn’t a headline on Drudge beats me. Hannity promised a big reveal, and last night he followed up on the story broken by “The Hill.” This should land Hillary in jail for selling out our Uranium. I started posting about this in 2010 and glad this finally has seen the light of day. Better yet, Eric Holder, Muller and Rosenstein, the very fine fellows who are investigating Trump and Russia knew about the bribery and did nothing. That’s right… they all should be in jail. Grassley is holding a hearing this morning.

UPDATE AT BOTTOM OF POST!

Earlier posts of mine:

Clintons and the give away of U.S. Uranium mines

Now the latest today from The Hill:

Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.

Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, however, the Department of Justice (DOJ) continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions.

The first decision occurred in October 2010, when the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States unanimously approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, giving Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium supply.

Snip…

That’s when conservative author Peter Schweitzer and The New York Times documented how Bill Clinton collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in Russian speaking fees and his charitable foundation collected millions in donations from parties interested in the deal while Hillary Clinton presided on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. Full story at  The Hill

On Wednesday Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) asked Attorney General Sessions if Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein will be allowed to investigate himself regarding new information on the Hillary Clinton Uranium One scandal.
Attorney General Sessions said it was up to him.

Holder: ‘Racist cops like those in Ferguson ‘Threaten the entire Nation’

Of course the Media is more than happy to oblige the Emperor and knock off any other story from gaining any traction. Forget Immigration, Forget the Planes that the Terrorists have in mind for us, forget the IRS scandal, forget ISIS. Let us beat the drum for race riots. There, that should do it. Holder’s remarks at a Black Church. Anyone recall this one?

WASHINGTON — The problems put on display after the death of Michael Brown in the small St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, Missouri, in August “are truly national in scope and that threaten the entire nation,” Attorney General Eric Holder said in a speech on Monday.Holder, speaking at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, said the nation needs to confront the broken relationship between many law enforcement agencies and the communities that they are supposed to serve.

“Broadly speaking, without mutual understanding between citizens — whose rights must be respected — and law enforcement officers — who make tremendous and often-unheralded personal sacrifices every day to preserve public safety — there can be no meaningful progress,” Holder said in prepared remarks. “Our police officers cannot be seen as an occupying force disconnected from the communities they serve. Bonds that have been broken must be restored. Bonds that never existed must now be created.”

Border Patrol Agent sentenced for ‘improperly lifting arms’

A U.S. Border Patrol agent has been sentenced to two years in prison for “improperly lifting the arms of a 15-year-old drug smuggling suspect” during an arrest where border agents found more than 150 pounds of marijuana being transported by illegal immigrants across the Rio Grande

Soon our thin blue line, or green as it may be, will no longer be there for us if we allow this nonsense to continue. This is exactly what Holder and Obama want. To demoralize our police force. Those who would give their lives for us. This must not stand. Mexico insists on this? Please, give me a break. Catch this:

The same U.S. Attorney’s office brought charges against two Border Agents in 2006 for shooting a drug-smuggling suspect in the buttocks as he tried to flee back into Mexico after leaving a van filled with 800 pounds of marijuana. The suspect was given immunity for testifying against the agents in that case, where agents were convicted and sentenced to 11 and 12 years of prison.

.The Washington Times reports on the Justice Department’s case, which said the agent violated the drug-smuggling teenager’s constitutional right to be free from unreasonable force:

“Agent Jesus E. Diaz Jr. was named in a November 2009 federal grand jury indictment with deprivation of rights under color of law during an October 2008 arrest near the Rio Grande in Eagle Pass, Texas, in response to a report that illegal immigrants had crossed the river with bundles of drugs.

In a prosecution sought by the Mexican government and obtained after the suspected smuggler was given immunity to testify against the agent, Diaz was sentenced last week by U.S. District Judge Alia Moses Ludlumin San Antonio. The Mexican consulate in Eagle Pass had filed a formal written complaint just hours after the arrest, alleging that the teenager had been beaten.”

Photos showed no bruises or marks that indicated a beating on the suspect’s body, other than marks from the straps of the bag loaded with drugs that the suspect had been carrying. More here at  The Blaze

Remember this? DHS orders Border Patrol to pick up trash

If the Border Patrol isn’t defending the border, what are they doing down there besides providing free police services to invading colonists and getting shot by Mexican bandits? National Border Patrol Council Local 2544 reveals the answer — picking up trash:

Teams of uniformed Border Patrol agents from the Casa Grande [AZ] station are being ordered to spend their duty shifts cleaning up trash on the Tohono O’Odham Indian reservation instead of performing the police work they were hired for.

Then we have this, thanks guys:

From :WND Here

The U.S. Border Patrol captured 59,017 “Other Than Mexican” illegal aliens, and among the nations are four nations on the State Department’s list of “State Sponsors of Terrorism” – Cuba, Iran, Syria and Sudan.

Seven hundred and twelve of those arrested were from Cuba, 14 from Iran, 5 from Sudan, and five from Syria. Others come from Somalia (9), Afghanistan, (9), Pakistan (37), Saudi Arabia (5) and Yemen (11), according to Judicial Watch.

The New York Five: Read the Unclassified Government Files on the Terrorists the White House Plans to Import into America

David Weber said :There is more respect from the Obama administration for EVERYONE else EXCEPT the people who built this country.  He is absolutely right.

The Obama Administration has announced it will bring Khalid Sheik Mohammed and four of his 9/11 co-conspirators –  all terrorists currently imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay — to trial in civilian courts in N911ew York City.  Read the unclassified files on these terrorists from the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and Department of Defense (DOD):

We should have given them the firing squad at Gitmo when we had the chance.
THIS belongs in civilian court?

Holder given control over State Secrets

Obama to Set Higher Bar For Keeping State Secrets- New Policy May Affect Wiretap, Torture Suits. Of course they do this the Alinsky way-when all attention is elsewhere–U.N., Donald Trump’s new best friend Gadifi!

In a stunning move, Holder to be given even more control. At the same time we are arresting terrorists all over the U.S., Obama still doesn’t get it. We are at War– yes, the word he hates so much. They want to kill us! Get it?

Washington Post 
The Obama administration will announce a new policy Wednesday making it much more difficult for the government to claim that it is protecting state secrets when it hides details of sensitive national security strategies such as rendition and warrantless eavesdropping, according to two senior Justice Department officials.

The new policy requires agencies, including the intelligence community and the military, to convince the attorney general and a team of Justice Department lawyers that the release of sensitive information would present significant harm to “national defense or foreign relations.” In the past, the claim that state secrets were at risk could be invoked with the approval of one official and by meeting a lower standard of proof that disclosure would be harmful.

That claim was asserted dozens of times during the Bush administration, legal scholars said.

The shift could have a broad effect on many lawsuits, including those filed by alleged victims of torture and electronic surveillance. Authorities have frequently argued that judges should dismiss those cases at the outset to avoid the release of information that could compromise national security.

The heightened standard is designed in part to restore the confidence of Congress, civil liberties advocates and judges, who have criticized both the Bush White House and the Obama administration for excessive secrecy. The new policy will take effect Oct. 1 and has been endorsed by federal intelligence agencies, Justice Department sources said.

“What we’re trying to do is . . . improve public confidence that this privilege is invoked very rarely and only when it’s well supported,” said a senior department official involved in the review, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the policy had not yet been unveiled. “By holding ourselves to this higher standard, we’re in some way sending a message to the courts. We’re not following a ‘just trust us’ approach.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/22/AR2009092204295.html?hpid%3Dtopnews