Just who are journalists and will be protected in the future? Diane Feinstein knows.

Oh, we knew this was coming didn’t we? Control the internet, and more importantly, control the blogosphere. The best part is that in the end Eric Holder and the DOJ will be the determiner of just who is a journalist in case there is any question. Let us not let this assault get away from us while we are distracted on so many fronts.

The US Senate attempted to define who is and is not a journalist. In the process of passing a “Shield Law” to protect journalists and their sources, a fiery debate ensued over just who is a journalist and who deserves the shield law protection.

Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) was adamant to only extend the protection to “real reporters” and not, she said, a 17-year-old with his own website.

“I can’t support it if everyone who has a blog has a special privilege … or if Edward Snowden were to sit down and write this stuff, he would have a privilege. I’m not going to go there.”

Matt Drudge, a man who redefined journalism at the dawn of the new media, and continues to lead the industry in traffic and influence, took to Twitter to defend bloggers and to hammer the senator.

And Drudge is speaking from personal experience. There was a time when the political and media establishment targeted him as “Public Enemy #1” and his groundbreaking work was derided as the end of journalism.  Drudge tweets that even a federal judge attempted to define his work as non-journalism. Video of the Feinstein hearing over at : Breitbart

Notes from the video clip below:

Senators Diane Feinstein & Schumer have proposed legislation that would “define” journalist as some one who works for a ‘real’ journalism organization, ie: ABC, CNN, FOX, NY Times etc etc. Thereby excluding any alternative media, bloggers or citizen journalists. Plain & simple, you would have to be government approved in order to report and NOT face criminal charges for whatever the government deemed as NOT being journalism or news. THE GOVERNMENT WISHES NOW TO CONTROL THE MEDIA & SILENCE dissent. To report anything the government does not deem as news could land you in jail.

Liberal Bloggers Reaction to the Beating They Took

Looking better. With the Obama’s presser that I caught, no insight by anyone. And that is a good thing. Failure to grasp one’s deficiencies, will lead to more of the same. No move to the Right– just vitriolic condemnation of the “unsophisticated” moronic, proletariat. But wait.. as I recall, once the unwashed masses catch on, they seem to have a penchant of taking care of the bourgeois  — better known now as the ‘Professional” left… whatever..

The most fascinating thing about the liberal blogger analysis of the election? Very few of them seem to be concluding that the beating that they just suffered has anything to do with all the unpopular policies that were pushed over the last two years. In other words, the idea that forcing through widely disliked liberal policies over the loud protests of a center-right nation could have led to their defeat — that doesn’t seem to have dawned on most of them.

So, what was their reaction? For the most part, either impotently stomping their adorable little feet because the mean old Republicans won, crazy talk (we compromised too much with the Republicans), or talking about how important it is for Obama to continue to pursue far-left wing policies. Here are some of the more eye-catching responses. !
 Great examples here at  Right Wing News as the libtards fail at insight. Enjoy

Obama meets with his Left-Wing Bloggers

I caught Michael Savage last night. He had the names of the Bloggers who met with Obama, and a run down of their nefarious histories. I was scouting around for the story and found this in Right Wing News  So the filibuster is now the problem for our dictator. Great insight into his warped and troubled mind.

There’s now a transcript of the conversation available. Most of it’s dull stuff, but one particular comment from Obama jumped out at me:

 I will say that as just an observer of our political process that if we do not fix how the filibuster is used in the Senate, then it is going to be very difficult for us over the long term to compete in a very fast moving global environment.

What keeps me up at night is China, Germany, India, Brazil — they’re moving. They make decisions, we’re going to pursue clean energy, and the next thing you know they’ve cornered half the clean energy market; we’re going to develop high-speed rail in the span of five years — suddenly they’ve got high-speed rail lines going; we’re going to promote exports, here’s what we’re going to do — boom, they get going.

And if we can’t sort of execute on key issues that will determine our competitiveness over the long term, we’re going to fall behind — we are going to fall behind.

And the filibuster is not part of the Constitution. The filibuster, if you look at the history of it, may have arisen purely by accident because somebody didn’t properly apply Robert’s Rules of Procedure and forgot to get a provision in there about what was required to close debate. And folks figured out very early, this could be a powerful tool. It was used as a limited tool throughout its history. Sadly, the primary way it was used was to prevent African Americans from achieving civil rights.

But setting aside that sordid aspect of its history, it was used in a very limited fashion. The big debates, the big changes that we had historically around everything from establishing public schools to the moon launch to Social Security, they weren’t subject to the filibuster. And I’m sympathetic to why the minority wants to keep it. And in fairness, Democrats, when we were in the minority, used it on occasion to blunt actions that we didn’t think were appropriate by the Bush administration.

This tells you a lot about how Barack Obama views the world. In his mind, nations don’t prosper because of people, character, creativity, or free enterprise; they prosper because of the actions of the government. It’s really not much different than this comment,

Every single great idea that has marked the 21st century, the 20th century and the 19th century has required government vision and government incentive. — Joe Biden

Here’s the problem: Not only is that vision of the world — that features people like Barack Obama and Joe Biden running America like a game of Sim City — wrong, it’s absolutely backwards.

Philly: Got a blog that makes no money? The city wants $300.

love-philly

Don’t let Zero know about this angle. Before you know it, we will be taxed out of existence. What a concept. Ah, the City of Brotherly Love

For the past three years, Marilyn Bess has operated MS Philly Organic, a small, low-traffic blog that features occasional posts about green living, out of her Manayunk home. Between her blog and infrequent contributions to ehow.com, over the last few years she says she’s made about $50. To Bess, her website is a hobby. To the city of Philadelphia, it’s a potential moneymaker, and the city wants its cut.

In May, the city sent Bess a letter demanding that she pay $300, the price of a business privilege license.

“The real kick in the pants is that I don’t even have a full-time job, so for the city to tell me to pony up $300 for a business privilege license, pay wage tax, business privilege tax, net profits tax on a handful of money is outrageous,” Bess says.

Read the rest here at City Paper

More story here: Hot Air