On the Purpose of Violence: A “Philosophical” Review BRZRKR Volume 2

I have to admit, when I first set out to begin this post, I had fuck-all to say. In my review of BRZRKR Volume One I had asked if Keanu Reeves’ comics debut was anything more than an excuse to spill red ink, and ultimately came to the conclusion that there was intrigue worth pursuing in the main character, but that if one was wholly opposed to the depiction of gratuitous violence on the page, there was no unique or captivating theme present that would justify pushing through (for the sake of ‘Literature’ so to speak).

BRZKR Volume 2 seems to reverse that polarity somewhat, though I only began to realize this upon the reflection inherent in the review process. Initial impressions were that this piece traded in the same stock as its predecessor: B has a mysterious and tragic existence, he kicks ass against impossible odds (and gets completely messed up while doing it), we get some flashbacks of B throughout history, a dark and nefarious cabal surrounds B seeking to exploit his power. A lot of blood and guts are spilled.

But as I considered what to write about this, I decided that there WAS more going on than I’d initially realized and that while the intrigue surrounding B seemed a bit less interesting in this volume, the broader story around him was beginning to grow in depth and meaning. Here’s what I mean:

The story opens with Diana (B’s doctor/psychiatrist/a thousand other things) at B’s home, in what seems like something of a half-hearted attempt at seduction. B is almost comical in his commitment to the ‘strong and silent’ type in this scene but Diana puts on a record and gets him talking, and he goes on something of a rant about how all songs — throughout humanity’s entire history — are about one thing.

For B, music’s only purpose is to bring people together to satisfy a “universal urge” for “it” (and then because B is tragic: “. . . or the loss of it”). When Diana suggests “it” might be love, B responds stoically that he doesn’t do that anymore. But given the panels we see about the women B is with losing their children, I might venture that “it” is more likely sex, or becomes so over time.

I don’t think the character work here is particularly interesting; stoic, jaded, and emotionally unavailable action heroes are more plentiful than grains of sand at the beach, but this inquiry into the purpose of music IS something the reader can sink their teeth into.

Personally, I disagree with B and think there is more to music than the joy of getting to smash, or the sorrow of no longer being able to. B himself almost has it when he muses how music brings people together — forms connections. But it is only half-formed since for B, there is only the one type of connection which matters.

This opening inquiry into the purpose of music is just a taste of the types of questions asked throughout the volume, which indeed seems to be centered around defining purpose (you may even say it is the volume’s . . . purpose lol). While wandering in the woods after surviving a helicopter crash, B questions his own purpose in one of the more interesting character moments for B as he carries one of his squad members with him, in essence saving the man despite how seemingly cheap life should be for B.

And finally, the true thematic work of this piece comes to the foreground as villain Caldwell discusses an artifact recovered on B’s last mission (the reason they had to trapse around in the woods). Caldwell has been tracking the progress of technology in relation to B’s movements and suggests that while death and destruction assuredly follow him wherever he goes, so does information. B remembers the knowledge and technological advancements of lost societies and so those cultures live on. Every place he visits, be brings with him every place he’s been and so cultures mix and humanity progresses technologically through a kind of cross pollination. Caldwell suggests this is B’s true purpose.

At this point, it is not unreasonable to see B as a metaphor or personification of the concept of war and Caldwell’s explanation of B’s purpose as a commentary for the true (and perhaps essential) purpose of war itself. It would be hard for me to believe that this comic is written as a justification for war, but I’m uncertain that it fully succeeds as a condemnation of it. The cost paid for eternal violence is focused around one person, the hero, and his unbearable burden; yet the disruption, pain and sorrow — in my opinion the true cost of war — for everyone in B’s path is more or less unexamined.

I’ve spent a lot of time discussing theme and some of the more weighty parts of this work, but I’d also like to point out that there are some things within these pages that are just enjoyable for their own sake, and not for what they state about the human condition. For me, the “fun” part of this series has always been B’s relationship with history and the glimpses of the past we see through his memory. B is shown in many recognizable eras, and I was pleased to see a few panels placing B in Ancient Egypt.

So, Give ‘BRZRKR Volume 2‘ a Read?

For this installment, I can more whole-heartedly commit to yes. I still have the same caveats (or perhaps trigger warnings) as BRZRKR Volume 1, but I think the added thematic work present in BRZRKR Volume 2 — surrounding the purpose of more abstract concepts such as music, and especially war — elevates this sequel above its first installment and generally makes all the blood, guts and violence more endurable.

That’s all I have for this week. Has anyone read this yet? What do you feel is the purpose of music? How about war? Leave your thoughts in the comments. Looking forward to discussing this one!

See you next time . . .

The Fifth Horseman – Not Quite Mort For Millennials

Trigger Warning: This book has important plot and thematic content centered around death and suicide. I’ve chosen to focus mainly on other portions of the content for my review, but I thought a heads up was in order.

After briefly discussing how Death is People Too last week, it just feels right to review The Fifth Horseman by Jon Smith, and not at all predetermined, primed, or planned. That this book released this week (February 7th; I’m a bit behind) and appears to be the author’s debut into fiction books (though he seems to have many other best selling non-fiction titles and other fiction in other media) is surely coincidence.

Certainly, this is not some fated moment, revealed to be the final link in a chain of cause and effect, monitored in the here-after by some unfathomable entity, which will inevitably stir from its pebble-dash cottage to —

Yes, pebble-dash.

It’s like cement with a bunch of pebbles mixed in. I googled it. Real popular, in a place called Thwing . . . Oh and I guess the here-after.

I mean it’s not just pebble-dash, there’s all kinds of weird stuff in the here-after. Candy bars no one eats anymore, color schemes from the 70s. It’s a pretty wild place. Anything dead ends up there, not just people . . .

My attempts at a vaguely humorous opening to this review aside, Jon Smith swings for the fences with The Fifth Horseman, and from the cutting critique of the odds stacked up against millennials, he swings a scythe.

Of course there is a long legacy of interpretations and personifications of “Death” as a character in all kinds of fiction. Smith’s portrayal of the character seems most closely related to that of Terry Pratchett in the almost universally popular series Discworld (the premise of becoming Death’s assistant recalls Pratchett’s own Mort!). In a few instances, I think Smith even references Pratchett by having the character speak in all-caps, but it is not kept up consistently.

We also experience some very Good Omens style horseman of the apocalypse, and one very clumsy Ancient Greek boatman, Charon. Our two main characters, Mark and Emma, run around reaping souls in Death’s stead, gathering tid bits of moral philosophy before hauling the deceased off to The Great Beyond. If you’ve ever played an Assassin’s Creed game, the format will feel very familiar to you.

I was at first intending to decry these structures as derivative and unoriginal, but as I continued to think about The Fifth Horseman after two or three days from finishing (always a good sign), it occurred to me that these things — while fun — where not really the core of Smith’s work. They may have been the stones mixed into the cement used to pebble-dash the walls but they were not the home within.

That home was the trials of our two protagonists and the judgements they faced on nearly every step along their journey in the afterlife as well as Smith’s answer to all the arguments millennials are tired of hearing. Interestingly, these answers are not always rebuttals necessarily.

One example of an encounter which can be interpreted two ways comes near the end of the story when one of the souls Mark and Emma are sent to reap — a brick layer — asks if either of them have ever failed to reap a soul. When they answer no, that failure is not an option, the soul (Phillip) has the following wisdom for them:

“I’ll untwist your mind for you – a mind that thinks it must always be perfect or be punished. Ask your boss if he’s ever dropped his tools and scraped paint that didn’t need scraping, and if he threatens to fire you, you’ll know it was more times than he could count. The good workers are the ones that fail most often but work the hardest to make things right.”

Honestly, not an invaluable lesson. But the stakes of Mark and Emma’s ‘job’, guiding souls to the afterlife, are literally a matter of life and death. As Mark notes, they “cannot afford to fail”.

So what should we take away from this? It’s unclear, but personally I felt that the true lesson was that even with the highest stakes immaginable, there is always room for error, and as the soul states a tad earlier: “…one failure cannot put a man down forever.”

For the last part of this review, I’ll talk about the humor. There are a few good laughs in this book, but I think I was hoping for more. I’m American, and many of the jokes seemed to involve English places and events so perhaps I just wasn’t connected to them in the way someone from the UK might. I’ll quote one joke which I did love and believe nearly anyone can appreciate:

“Come now,” Charon mocked. “You still fighting off yer sea legs?” I thought you young sprats could scrap for hours at a time!”
“Our generation,” Emma said, “can’t even watch Netflix for hours at a time without getting tired.”

So, the humor is there. I think I was looking for more of it.

So . . . Read it?

Sure! But do so with the right expectations. Given its comic lens, and the characters it seemingly shares with Discworld and Good Omens, The Fifth Horseman feels like a natural successor to Terry Pratchett. Reading it with this expectation will be a disappointment for you, and a diservice to the book itself.

Instead, consider the problems and anxieties laid bare within the text. How does Smith try to play the hand delt to millennials? Do you agree with his interpretations? These are the questions that make reading The Fifth Horseman a fun and engaging read.

Death Is People Too: Personifying the Loss of Existence in History and Fiction

Hi all! Please excuse the rather academic sounding title of this post, and perhaps its seemingly disturbing subject matter. It’s not my intent to be macabre or grim, but rather just a chance to write about some of the research rabbit holes I’ve fallen down and ‘show my work’ while reading the works of others, or attempting to write my own fiction. If you’ve read my Food in Ancient Egypt post, this is something along the same lines.

It may later relate to an ARC I’m hoping to review on the blog Tuesday, it may turn out to be nothing (aka I didn’t finish reading the book on time).

Anyway, here’s some notes on Death as personified in history and fiction. Enjoy!

Summary

The personification of death is a common trope in fiction, history and mythology. Mostly, death is personified as a god or goddess, or at the very least, a shadowy figure meant to inspire fear.

The Notes . . .

The Grim Reaper

Usually a skeletal figure, shrouded in a dark, hooded robe and carrying a scythe to “reap” human souls.

The Grim Reaper seems to have appeared in Europe during the 14th century, when the continent was dealing with the Black Death believed to be the result of the plague. Nearly a third of Europe’s entire population perished as a result of this pandemic.

While the symbolism of the skeleton is obvious enough (a dead and decayed human body) the dark robes are not as obvious. It’s believed that they are reminiscent of the robes of religious figures of the time conducting funerary services. The scythe was probably a very prevalent image for farmers of the time, using this tool to harvest crops. As such, The Grim Reaper becomes a harvester of souls.

Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

In The Bible, Death is personified as one of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, the others being Pestilence, War, and Famine. Each of the horsemen ride a different color horse (White/Pestilence, Red/War; Black/Famine) with Death coming last on a “Pale” horse. It is believed that this coloring is meant to represent the paleness of a corpse, and is sometimes depicted as green or greenish yellow as the original Greek is ‘khloros’ (like chlorophyll or chlorine).

While the other horsemen carry objects, Death is accompanied only by ‘Hades’. Though Hades is often personified as a greek god, it seems that in this instance, the name is meant to represent the underworld which the dead will go to. Death is the only one of the horsemen explicitly given a name: Thanatos.

More modern depictions of Death as the final horsemen often add the imagery of the Grim Reaper with death as a black-robed skeleton, wielding a scythe.

Gods of Death

In Ancient Egypt

The Ancient Egyptian god of the underworld was Osiris, and as a human mummy, he is probably the best candidate for a personification of death within the Ancient Egyptian pantheon. However, his roll in their mythology was primarily that of a judge, and it is not obvious that he ever left the Duat.

Perhaps more similar to Christian personifications of death, is the Ancient Egyptian god Anubis who is responsible for overseeing funerary rites, protecting graves, and guiding souls through the Duat.

Since Anubis is generally represented as a jackal, or a jackal headed man, it is uncertain whether this counts as “personification”, but it is certainly similar.

Dogs had and important roll in Ancient Egypt, and jackal headed deities were quite prominent. Please see my review of Death Dogs: The Jackal Gods of Ancient Egypt if you’re interested in more information.

In Slavic Folklore

Death was personified by a woman whose name is slightly different depending on the language, but generally known as Morana (Marena in Russian, Marzanna in Polish etc).

Specifically, she was associated with the death of winter, rebirth and dreams.

Potential Reading List For This Trope

Obviously, this list is not exhaustive, but these are the titles which are on my radar recently. You’ll notice quite a few humorous offerings on the list, which might just reflect what I’m interested in right now. I’ll add links to any reviews I do here as I go. Please leave me recommendations in the comments!

  • Mort by Terry Pratchett
  • The Sandman by Neil Gaiman (1989)
  • Good Omens by Terry Pratchett AND Neil Gaiman
  • A Dirty Job by Christopher Moore
  • The Book Theif Markus Zusak
  • Gods of Jade and Shadow by Silvia Moreno- Garcia
  • Death with Interruptions by Jose Saramago (2009)
  • Scythe by Neal Shusterman
  • Grave Mercy by Robin LaFevers
  • The Fifth Horsemen by Jon Smith

Links

Wikipedia:

Death Personified: The Best Fiction with Death as a Character – https://www.talkdeath.com/death-personified-best-fiction-with-death-as-a-character/

Where Does the Concept of a “Grim Reaper” Come From? – https://www.britannica.com/story/where-does-the-concept-of-a-grim-reaper-come-from

Conclusion?

Nothing too much as of yet, but I’m definitely fascinated by these personifications, and hope to research them more and add to this post as I learn. Are there any cultures I should look at right away? Any books I missed on the reading list?

Please let me know in the comments!