Revisiting Crichton’s Lost World After 29 Years

Today, September 8th 2024 will mark 29 years since the novel The Lost World: Jurassic Park was published back in 1995. By this point in the middle of the nineties, Michael Crichton had already become a household name from the massive success of his original Jurassic Park novel (1990), as well as the iconic movie adaptation directed by Stephen Spielberg also titled Jurassic Park (1993).

Though perhaps not quite as successful as the original, The Lost World still held down an impressive 8 weeks on the best seller list (vs the original novel’s 12 weeks), and was subsequently turned into another iconic film.

Great. But by Now, Isn’t it Just Some Old Fossil?

Obviously, a lot has happened in almost 30 years since this book hit the shelves. We’ve experienced a third ‘Jurassic Park‘ film, as well a series reboot, Jurassic World, which also had a sequel, and a third movie which purportedly closed out the Jurassic franchise with Jurassic World Dominion.

(Spoiler: A fourth movie Jurassic World: Rebirth will release July 2nd 2025. Check Variety for the deets on what we know so far about the new JW film .

Of course much has changed in our understanding of paleontology as well. For example, Prehistoric Planet: Freshwater shows crowd favorite, the terrifying Velociraptor, as a more accurate chicken-sized pack hunter with feathers as opposed to the six-foot scaled and tiger-striped monstrosities we read about in this sequel (which are probably more accurate to the Utah Raptor, written about in Robert Bakker’s Raptor Red.

There is perhaps a legitimate argument to be made that, given all that has passed since this book came out — both in the fictive world of the franchise, and the real world of paleontology. Is this old fossil even relevant in 2024?

“The essence of verification is multiple lines of reasoning that converge at a single point”

To answer that, perhaps it would be good to discuss a few things, some good, others bad, which I experienced while reading this classic.

The Good

Despite any arguments of this book having ‘aged’, Crichton is still an incredibly engaging story teller. His approach is similar to what I noted in the original novel, with a kind of slow build in which the main characters solve a mystery, the solution to which sets the real action of the story in motion (this seems to be a common trope for Crichton). Perhaps this mode is too slow for modern readers, but I hardly noticed it myself.

Then of course there are the dinosaurs themselves. Accurate or not, they are COMPELLING. We see many favorites through the course of this novel like Tyrannosaurus Rex, and Velociraptor; Compsognathus (compy) and Triceratops . Pachycephalosaurus was (I think) a new comer that was not in the first novel. So was Carnotaurus.

The Interesting

The inclusion of Carnotaurus was especially interesting as it was given some adaptations which I believe there is probably zero scientific basis for, in 1995 or today. If you’ve watched the Indominus Rex become essentially transparent in Jurassic World, it seems that was an idea for which the foundations were laid in this book (though interestingly not in The Lost World movie).

This poetic license stands out even more considering Crichton appears to have tried to correct some of the imagination he displayed in his original novel surrounding T-Rex visual acuity. There is a scene in which the more villainous characters in the novel visit a T-Rex nest and are discovered by the tyrant lizards. The characters stand still, attempting the trick Alan Grant accomplished at the park. One is eaten almost immediately and the rest must flee for their lives. Of course Malcom has a quip about reading bad science, but still the entire thing seemed odd.

Another interesting part of this book was Dr. Levine, a sort of impatient rich/arrogant scientist who they embark on their journey to rescue in the first place. He’s a pretty large part of the story, and to my knowledge, just not in the movie at all. I was not expecting this.

Also, there is a scene in which a group of velociraptors hunt some triceratops and in particular, there is a briefly described fight between an individual of each species. It has me thinking about the Fighting Dinosaurs Fossil found in the Djadokhta Formation in Mongolia. That prehistoric battle took place between a velociraptor, and a Protoceratops, but its discovery in 1971 would have meant that it was probably a pretty well known fossil by the time Crichton’s book was written. The scene functions on a practical level to advance certain points of the plot, but I couldn’t help but wonder if the way it unfolds was a small homage to this famous fossil.

The Bad

Despite what I’ve written above, and my ability to look aside when almost any egregious portion of the text rears its head — due to my love of the subject matter and firmly framed rose-colored glasses — a couple pills in this book were still a bit hard to swallow.

First up, I didn’t really feel like Malcom’s survival from book one was explained satisfactorily. It’s essentially: News of Malcom’s treatment was so suppressed and kept quiet that many assumed, and reported, that he was dead . . . and that’s pretty much all there is to say about it. Felt a bit cheap.

My second quibble is equally subjective. Reading Easy Go, and even the first JP novel, you get the sense that Crichton’s female characters, and modern expectations of female characters, don’t really align. The Lost World felt like Crichton was trying to close that gap all at once.

Sarah Harding is ultra- strong, attractive, independent, and feminist. In some scenes she literally carries Malcom around like a rag doll. It’s all very “Action Girl” and while Mary Sue type characters like this are not inherently bad, Harding’s characterization in TLW generally left me feeling like Crichton still did not understand the assignment.

In Easy Go, the MC named Pierce judges the love interest, Lisa, as competent because she lights a cigarette “like a man.” In TWL it felt to me like Crichton was attempting to write a woman of importance into his story, but (still) only qualifying that importance by what she could do “like a man.”

Give ‘The Lost World’ a read?

Ultimately, I would say yes. There may be some inaccuracies in paleontology, and the pacing and characterization of his female lead may present some problems for modern readers, but the thrill of the being on an island in the presence of dinosaurs (even if some are trying to eat you), still feels quite potent in this novel.

Finally, I’ll leave you with a quote from Malcom (always Malcom) which stood out to me as being incredibly relevant to today despite having been written nearly 30 years ago:

“. . . if the notion of life at the edge of chaos is true, then major change pushes animals closer to the edge. It destabilizes all sorts of behavior. And when the environment goes back to normal, it’s not really a return to normal. In evolutionary terms, it’s another big change, and it’s just too much to keep up with . . .” pg 193.

Ooof. If that isn’t the most post-covid mood, then I don’t know what is hahah.

That’s all I have today. Has anyone read this one before? What’s your favorite dinosaur!? Please let me know in the comments. I’m looking forward to talking about this one!

#DinosaurDay 2023: The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs

Writing this review today feels a bit like cheating.

It feels a bit like cheating because I haven’t quite finished The Rise and Fall of Dinosaurs yet. I’ve still got just a little less than one hundred pages left before I can mark it ‘finished’ on Goodreads.

However, #JurassicJune does not wait while I discuss Kratos’ Adventures in Egypt, or the marks and signs of magic. It cares little for things like Memorial Day celebrations, or the slow and deliberate notes that I’ve been filling my Obsidian vault with while reading this book . . .

It comes.

As the Jurassic gave way to the Cretaceous (words I feel much more comfortable slinging about because of reading this book), so too has May seceded to June, and all its #WyrdAndWonder of Fantasy evolves into the dinosaur themed goodness of #JurassicJune.

The first link in that chain is June 1st, #DinosaurDay. My approach this year is much the same as in years past, namely to review some non-fiction title which would teach me something about dinosaurs.

Back in 2021, I reviewed Kenneth Lacovara’s Why Dinosaurs Matter, a TED-Talk-turned-book which follows Lacovara’s career and served as a great entry point for me, just beginning to learn about the history of paleontology and the concepts necessary to further study these amazing creatures we call dinosaurs.

Last year (2022), I talked about Darren Naish’s Dinopedia: A Brief Compendium of Dinosaur Lore. I felt this book brought me firmly away from shallows and into the depth and intricacies of the discipline. Naish’s prose are funny, ironic, and sometimes serious, but always comprehensible and enlightening. With entries on each of the dinosaur clades, history of famous paleontologists, and their significance to science and popular culture, I’d say this is a handy reference for anyone looking to broaden their knowledge on this subject.

And this year, 2023, we tackle Steve Brusatte’s The Rise and Fall of Dinosaurs. I say tackle, because of the entries I’ve discussed so far, this book is by far the longest. Including the notes and index (which I intend to read), TRaFotD is just over 400 pages while Naish and Lacovara’s books are a scant 215 and 192 pages respectively.

TRaFotD follows a format familiar to me from books like The Lost Dinosaurs of Egypt, or even Why Dinosaurs Matter, which mixes the personal experience of the paleontologist with the history and science they are writing about. Consider a chef stirring a large pot of textbook, and adding a dash of memoir here and there for taste, and you’ll have a good idea of how this book reads. Even if it’s something common among these types of books, it seems a very good way to spice up what might otherwise be a very dull read (even for dinosaur enthusiasts like myself).

In terms of the content covered, TRaFotD is pretty much exactly what it says on the tin, walking readers through each period of geological history and describing what was going on in the world at the moment different dinosaurs lived. I was quite shocked to find how harsh the conditions were during certain periods and how volatile. Megamonsoons in the Triassic, and 3,000 foot thick lava tsunamis in the later parts of that period? No thank you.

In my post reviewing Jurassic Park after a decade, I mentioned briefly an argument from Malcom’s character that humanity does not have the power to destroy or save the planet, and how awkwardly that section reads in light of Chrichton’s remarks at Cal Tech in 2003 (essentially denying climate change).

After reading the green-house gas fueled conditions the dinosaurs endured, without any humans around to contribute one way or another, I can see how easy it might be to think that our impact is negligible when looking at history through a geological lens.

I don’t think that is a stance this book takes; I’d imagine Brusatte has the opposite view in fact, but it was still interesting to discover nonetheless.

(Also there must be some irony that burning fossils is recreating the world in which those fossils were created).

Returning to the review itself, I would like to reiterate just how jam-packed this book is with prehistoric life. At only 300 pages in, I’ve already taken notes on over fifty types of reptile, mammal, dinosauromorph, and actual dinosaurs (part of the reason I’m moving so slow is all the notes). This might seem overwhelming (and looked at statistically it kinda is), but it never feels that way while reading.

Of course Brusatte talks about all of the major players that any child would recognize like T-Rex, Brontosaurus, Triceratops etc. but these are really only a small fraction of the types of creatures which made dinosaurs so fascinating, and Brusatte is not afraid to explore them all. This approach not only allows us to engage with new, or lesser-known dinos, but also sends us to places around the globe such as Poland, Argentina, Scottland and many more where these dinosaurs were discovered.

I probably only have a few gripes with the book, and each are quite surmountable in the end.

First, there are maps of how the continents looked at different stages during Earth’s history which despite Brusatte’s excellent descriptions, I still found necessary to look at. I only wish they had been mixed within the text and not just dumped in the beginning. Considering I struggled with a lack of positioning in time and geography during the first episode of Prehistoric Planet, this might just be a me issue.

Next, unfortunately when a dinosaur is discovered by paleontologists and when it lived in real life is not a very linear timeline. What I mean is, some of the dinosaurs we’ve known about for a very long time, were some of the latest to evolve, where older dinosaurs are only now being discovered. This gets compounded by the fact that Brusatte’s career is on a whole other timeline as well.

Needless to say I sometimes would get confused when the author would jump from a later part of his career to an earlier one to keep the narrative of how dinosaurs progressed in geological time in a linear fashion. I understand that this is necessary to the structure of how the book was written, however, it was sometimes hard to track.

Finally, my biggest gripe was actually how he described many individuals of the absolute legion of colleagues he’s had the opportunity to work with over his long career. The author often seems to fall into a pattern of comparing each person to a stereo type from a movie or book (often villainous) before essentially saying “But once I got to know them, they were incredible human individuals which I count among my greatest friends”.

It was a weird and slightly off-putting formula which made me feel like I would never want to be mentioned in one of his books. Why not just skip to all the parts you love about that person? What cool stuff they worked on, and why they’re special enough to include in your book? Seems like it’d be a good idea to lead with those things.

This strange quirk did not seem to carry over to figures from history, or paleontologists which Brusatte did not know personally although I did feel that there might still be a bit of sensationalism happening in their descriptions and introductions as well. Examples that stood out to me were any descriptions of Robert Bakker (author of Raptor Red), and the pretty much the whole section about Cope and Marsh.

In all honesty, I’m relatively new to all this, so those characters may have really been as Brusatte describes, but it just seemed a little much.

Give this One a Read?

Yes! Despite the slightly confusing timeline, awkwardly placed map references, and weird quirks surrounding characterization of real people, I would say this book is required reading for anyone attempting to get their foot in the door in terms of dinosaurs.

Brusatte balances a good mix of science and facts with personal anecdotes which engage the reader in a long and complicated history. This book is FULL of dinosaurs and all kinds of other prehistoric life and just getting to learn about such a diverse cast of characters is well worth the long page count.

Finally, I feel like The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs has served as a bit of a spark for me to dive back into researching and writing about dinosaurs in my own fiction. This book was filled with so much information and ideas, that I couldn’t help but feel inspired to record them and try to use them within my own work.

If nothing else, The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs was a great way to kick off #JurassicJune and get excited about dinosaurs again!

Have any of you read this book? What were your thoughts? Was there a favorite dinosaur or animal mentioned within the text that you love? Please let me know in the comments!

See you next time.

Prehistoric Planet: Initial Thoughts

So I wasn’t really expecting to be writing a review right now. It’s Monday night (though this is probably posted Tuesday morning) and I’m hanging out with my fellow writers. We’re all chilling on Zoom typing quietly which, given the fact I don’t find that very weird anymore, is probably WHY it’s weird. But anyway, we’re supporting each other, and I’m supposed to be working on a short story for next quarter’s newsletter, or finishing a listicle for #WyrdAndWonder, or any of a hundred different writing projects I’ve been meaning to get done, but I’m not doing any of those things right now, because all I can think about is a little T-rex pouncing on baby turtles, or an even tinier pterosaur base jumping over the open ocean and hoping for the best.

All productivity is gone, as I can’t really think of anything else besides these delightful creatures which Apple Tv+ has managed to dig up out of the dirt, and bring to life in a way I feel has heretofore never happened in my memory.

I’m something of a dinosaur fan here on this blog, and will get pretty excited about even the dumbest depictions (I actually watched and enjoyed Velocipastor) of prehistoric life just to feel a little bit of that passion, awe and wonder (and a little fear) I felt as a kid.

But there’s no need to force it with Prehistoric Planet. Every image looks amazing, and each fact seemed more interesting and startling than the last.

I’m no paleontologist certainly, but I do enjoy reading about pre-history from time to time and I feel like I’m building up a bit of a knowledge-base about what the really ancient (obviously a technical term) world was supposedly like. But I’ll be the first to admit that it can sometimes be as difficult to dig into as actual rock.

I can understand Ceratopsians and Ceratopsids having a similar name, but what’s Ceratosaurus’ excuse? It sounds way too similar to be SO different.

Anyway, at least so far in the first episode (“Coasts”) we’re not dealing with this level of granularity which I believe would have made the show completely unwatchable. However, I wish we had a little more grounding. The opening is of a group of swimming T. Rexes — which was itself a strange image though maybe it shouldn’t have been — so I can assume we’re in the Cretaceous?

Where in time we were was essentially not explained at all, even though prehistoric geography was sprinkled in here and there. We go from recognizable continent names like North America, to lesser known names like Zealandia.

Also, the map of the Cretaceous is completely different than the map we know now. I think an opening shot of the umm . . . PREHISTORIC PLANET!! would have really helped to get us situated.

Anyway, these are probably nitpicks, and I think for a general audience, which is clearly who Apple is shooting for, I think the show is going to be more than incredible, which pretty much makes me really happy no matter what.

Anyway, those are my initial reactions to Prehistoric Planet: Episode 1 – Coasts. I’m really looking forward to the rest of this series. I don’t think I’ll cover each episode as it comes out as I just don’t have the bandwidth right now, but I wanted to gush a bit about this before it breezed on by. I’ll probably do a follow up at the end when I’ve finished watching but just know my general impression is that it’s awesome, and I’m sooo looking forward to episode 2 which is supposed to be about North African dinosaurs. I’m hoping that means we’ll see some of our friends from The Lost Dinosaurs of Egypt including Paralititan, and Spinosaurus!

Let me know your thoughts in the comments! Looking forward to talking about this one!