Michael Bailey
18.8K posts
- I have just been notified that my paper with Suzanna Diaz will be retracted by the publisher due to concerns about lack of informed consent. This paper:
- It has come to my attention that the retracted version of our article on Rapid onset gender dysphoria (ROGD) is hard to read because of its defacing (Retracted Article on every page) by the publisher Springer Nature. Here’s a link to the original version:
- Repeating an assertion is not an argument. Repeating an assertion is not an argument. Repeating an assertion is not an argument. Repeating an assertion is not an argument.
- Replying to @profjmbArticle will remain online but with retraction notice. It remains true. Let's Streisand this thing!
- These scholars just met in Toronto for three days to discuss the science and other issues related to autogynephilia. Articles will be written, eventually.
- Replying to @avidseries and @eyeslashoI am an expert and have been unable to find a link to the official data summaries. Do you have them?
- Replying to @Molly85224872I am collaborating on a much larger (more participants, more extensive survey) long-term study that will include both parents. and gender dysphoric adolescents. Hope to launch this summer. The Diaz and Bailey study remains in the scientific literature. Cite it.
- Replying to @profjmbParents contacted Suzanna Diaz after seeing her invitation to complete a survey. These parents were concerned their children have ROGD. They wanted the data out. Obviously.
- Our article “Detransition and Desistance Among Previously Trans-Identified Young Adults” is just published. Coauthors: @LisaLittman1 @stellaomalley3 @lacroicsz @profjmb Thread: 1/24
- Suzanna Diaz and I are happy that our new paper has been published: Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria: Parent Reports on 1655 Possible Cases open access
- Our article that was retracted at Archives of Sexual Behavior (Rapid onset gender dysphoria: Parent reports on 1655 possible cases) has been “republished” at Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences. Download here: researchers.one/articles/23.10…
- Replying to @NaozymandiasIt's okay. The controversy has publicized the article far more than it would have been. And the shame is Springer's, not ours.
