user avatar
David Buss
@ProfDavidBuss
Author of The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating
Austin, Texas
Joined April 2009
  • user avatar
    Really great conversation with Lex Fridman.
    Here's my conversation with @profdavidbuss, an evolutionary psychologist at UT Austin & one of the founders of evolutionary psychology. We talk about sex, dating, and sex differences. This was fascinating & fun. Thank you @hubermanlab for connecting us. youtube.com/watch?v=sndW9h…
  • user avatar
    Apologies for the retweet, but I enjoyed my conversation with @lexfridman tremendously. It has also exceeded half a million 'views.' As an introverted academic, I'm happy to reach a wider audience.
    Here's my conversation with @profdavidbuss, an evolutionary psychologist at UT Austin & one of the founders of evolutionary psychology. We talk about sex, dating, and sex differences. This was fascinating & fun. Thank you @hubermanlab for connecting us. youtube.com/watch?v=sndW9h…
  • user avatar
    Excellent article in @Quillette taking apart the latest absurd anti-sex difference book. When will science actually triumph over ideology in this domain?
  • user avatar
    Honored that my conversation with Lex Fridman on his podcast @lexfridman has already surpassed 300,000 views after 9 days:
  • user avatar
    Strong replication of key findings of Buss's (1989) 37-culture study of sex differences in mate preferences; no support for 'social role theory' digest.bps.org.uk/2019/03/13/a-n…
  • user avatar
    Happy to report that the 6th edition of Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, is now out. Major revision, with 200 new references: amazon.com/Evolutionary-P…
  • user avatar
    Glad to see replicability when so many findings fail to replicate. My question: How many empirical refutations of social role theory will be needed before it is abandoned?
    Sex differences in mate preferences are no smaller in more gender-equal nations, contrary to the idea that these differences are a product of socially-imposed gender roles. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14…
  • user avatar
    Sexual conflict: Are there human analogs?
  • user avatar
    My paper on mate preferences across cultures just passed 5,000 Google Scholar citations, a record for me. An unknown number of citations come from people who hate it or its findings. Some found the paper worthy. If interested, here is a link: labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/201…
  • user avatar
    You can run, but you can't hide from evolved sex differences in mate preferences . . . even in Norway.
    Even in the most gender‐equal society in the world, women give more weight to earning potential in the opposite sex and are far more likely to marry up than men. ftp.iza.org/dp12185.pdf
  • user avatar
    Contrary to social role theory, sex differences tend to be larger in countries with higher gender equality. A highly replicable finding: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.10…
  • user avatar
    I'm excited that the new edition 'Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind (7-e)' is finally published. It's been 5 years since the last edition. Here is a link for those interested: amazon.com/Evolut.../dp/1…... I love the new cover; it features 'Darwin's Arches.'
  • user avatar
    In an age of replication crisis, these sex differences have stood the test of time-replicable across cultures and times, and by dozens of independent researchers.
    Replying to @ogiehart
    theory was tested across 37 cultures (total N: 10,047) by @ProfDavidBuss which results: 1. Females were found to value cues to resource acquisition in Potential Mates more highly than Males. 2. Reproductive capacity were valued more by Males than by Females.
    https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2015/10/buss-1989-sex-differences-in-human-mate-preferences.pdf
  • user avatar