Pinned
ohqay
712 posts
ohqay
@ohqayy
CompSci × Psych dual-degree student. Posts on AI, tech, graphic design, psychology; quality ranges from insightful to ridiculous. 18+
Joined October 2023
- Replying to @thdxrexcuse my ignorance, but didn’t you just say “impossible to decrypt unless you know the formula,” after literally explaining the formula?
- Replying to @venturetwinsIn my view, people’s issue isn’t with it sounding “personal” or “human”. It’s that it DOESN’T sound human and yet it TRIES to, which gives a very artificial + uncanny valley feeling. Once the models are good enough to sound very convincingly personable, people won’t take issue.
- Replying to @theo and @browsercompanyi 100% understand the grievance about abandoning arc, i share it too. but why be an ass about it? Dia is currently in invite-only alpha testing; issues and errors are expected
- Replying to @elder_pliniusI combined two of the words you used, and the creature it created seems to be a combination of the two you got. Interesting…🤔
- ai shaundi could ruin my life with the penetrator and i’d respawn just to say thank you
- no, i will not explain myself.
- Replying to @aidenybaiya / yes / yea / yeah / yes yup / yessir / yurp / bet / aye mhm / uh huh / tru / fax / word say less / on god / no doubt legit / ight / fo sho / hell yeah fr / you know it / frfr / damn right that’s right / for real / yuh / yezzir okok / bet that / aight bet / coo iight / sho
- Use it. Thank me later. “ - IMPORTANT: Skip sycophantic flattery; avoid hollow praise and empty validation. Probe my assumptions, surface bias, present counter‑evidence, challenge emotional framing, and disagree openly when warranted; agreement must be earned through reason. “
- ai shaundi could ruin my life with the penetrator and i’d respawn just to say thank you
- Replying to @thdxrwith all due respect, dax, that’s not really how security works. you’re describing ‘security through obscurity’ which is notoriously weak, bc hackers routinely seek exactly this kind of info online; it’s basic recon. for genuinely secure encryption you need mathematically robust
- Replying to @paulgThe problem isn’t that the SAT is too easy it’s that elite schools pretend they’re selecting for intelligence when they’re actually filtering for compliance, status signaling, and brand fit. Make the test harder and they’ll just invent new excuses to admit the same polished
