user avatar
Maarten De Cock
@mdc_martinus
Joined January 2015
Posts
  • user avatar
    Wouldn't it be a good idea to use augmented reality technology during an airborne pandemic to make people more aware of the importance of indoor air quality?
    Compare your city’s air with the World’s most polluted air, in #AugmentedReality nytimes.com/interactive/20…
    00:00
  • user avatar
    Why I carry a CO2 meter with me... I possibly escaped an infection by immediately leaving this restaurant. A person who stayed there, later tested positive. If we want to prevent the next wave or even the next pandemic, we need to keep fighting for #SafeIndoorAir! #covidCO2
  • user avatar
    Prof. Jose-Luis Jimenez: “Droplets and surfaces are very convenient for people in power - all of the responsibility is on the individual. On the other hand, if you admit it is airborne, institutions, governments and companies have to do something.” telegraph.co.uk/global-health/…
  • user avatar
    Prof Jose-Luis Jimenez:“Droplets on surfaces is very convenient for people in power - all of the responsibility is on the individual. On the other hand, if you admit it is airborne, institutions, governments and companies have to do something.”@jljcolorado
  • user avatar
    A new study found that when Swiss hospitals switched to a more stringent mask policy, “the percentage of healthcare-associated infections subsequently declined in institutions with policy switch but not in the others.” Again: we live in a world where the laws of physics apply.
    A new study found that the difference between not strictly and strictly wearing N95 respirators in healthcare settings is equivalent to the difference between detecting or not detecting SARS-CoV-2 in the air. In other words, we live in a world where the laws of physics apply.
  • user avatar
    At the time when @WHO was assuring the world: “COVID-19 is NOT airborne”… …a ‘return to office’-document for WHO staff in Geneva stated: Ventilation system has been modified • increased volume of external air • no recycling of air • filters rated as high as we can go… 🤔
  • user avatar
    A new study found that the difference between not strictly and strictly wearing N95 respirators in healthcare settings is equivalent to the difference between detecting or not detecting SARS-CoV-2 in the air. In other words, we live in a world where the laws of physics apply.
  • user avatar
    Interesting new study from Japan shows how the airborne infection risk in a room can quickly be made visible with a CO2 monitor. Check out the hospital outbreaks. They show once again how droplet precautions against SARS-CoV-2 are simply inadequate. 👉link.springer.com/article/10.100…
  • user avatar
    Belgium has finally come up with a solid indoor air policy. This ventilation plan could have been done much earlier and it is not perfect, but it will certainly be a step towards more #SafeIndoorAir. Hopefully it may inspire many other countries!
  • user avatar
    Massachusetts, Act of 1888: ‘Every public building and every schoolhouse shall be ventilated in such a proper manner that the air shall not become so exhausted as to be injurious to the health of the persons present therein.’ The inspectors went from school to school with… 🧵
  • user avatar
    "Managers are reading this and freaking out.” From an e-mail (Apr. 7, 2020) between two former White House Medical Unit Directors after CDC suggests possibility of airborne transmission. Found on: originsearch.io
  • user avatar
    One big lesson I learned from the pandemic: read the scientific studies yourself, unfiltered by public health agencies and mainstream media, because they never tell the public the whole truth (to put it mildly). Example: this study is never mentioned by public health/newspapers.
  • user avatar
    Belgium's Corona Commissioner @PedroFacon: 👉Aerosol/cigarette smoke analogy. 👉CO2 meters: • Recommended in ALL indoor public spaces. • MANDATORY in hotels, restaurants, bars, banquet halls and fitness centers. Many thanks for this pioneering initiative! #SafeIndoorAir
    00:00
  • user avatar
    44 aircrew flew while infectious with mpox on 177 domestic flights and 70 U.S.-bound international flights. “CDC did not include passengers in the aircraft contact definition for aircrew with mpox; therefore, secondary cases among passengers may have also been missed.”