user avatar
Lessig πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
@lessig
Law professor, activist.
Brookline, MA
Joined December 2007
Posts
  • user avatar
    This is the money quote for the whole Trump v. United States case. Justice Barrett has it exactly right β€” and shows why the Court (and maybe the Special Counsel) is making this way too hard. The sole question should be whether acts relating to running for president are core
  • user avatar
    The ignorance in this tweet is astonishing. The Net was born neutral. From the beginning, the FCC and others fought to keep it neutral. The 2015 rules assured its neutrality. Then the clueless (or corrupt) took that protection away.
    Snowflake, believing online propaganda: "OMG w/o net neutrality, the Internet is gone!" Informed observer: "You know, the FCC issued that rule in 2015. The Internet grew up wonderfully free from govt regulation & this restores the status quo ante." Snowflake: "Uh, never mind..."
  • user avatar
    We believe there are now at least 20 GOP electors considering a vote of conscience. Last week, there was 1. ow.ly/vHxS3076kVa
  • user avatar
    So @SenWarren is in a tough place, choosing btw a probable primary winner and his principled opponent. But remember: @JoeBiden is the only major Dem candidate NOT TO commit to making fundamental reform – what she calls anti-corruption reform – happen first. @SenSanders has.
  • user avatar
  • user avatar
    Brilliant piece by Philip Howard. But let's not forget that @AndrewYang is also the most aggressive campaign finance reformer left on stage. That too is a critical part of fixing government: "Promising the moon, ignoring broken government" ow.ly/wxtb30pxMFU
  • user avatar
    β€œwinner take all” is not in the constitution: the vote if electoral votes were allocated proportionally.
  • user avatar
    Why Bush v. Gore might mean that Clinton should be president: The EP argument against winner-take-all: #1p1vote
  • user avatar
    Jill Stein could do something critically important here β€” help her?
  • user avatar
    exactly, which makes this so bizarre. We all can understand that when the president is candidate, his obligations are different. He's got to pay for Airforce One, for example. Why the Court couldn't see this is bizarre.
  • user avatar
    My oped in the LA Times: Why Mayor Pete's 'wine cave' dinner is beside the point -
  • user avatar
    -@aaronsw, +5 Five years ago, we lost Aaron Swartz. None should rest, for still, there is no peace.
  • user avatar
    Brilliant event with @SenSanders tonight in Concord with @ZephyrTeachout. Every answer, perfect - especially his committing to @RoKhanna’s democracy vouchers and making reform issue number 1.
  • user avatar
    Can't quite believe this is happening, but Congress is gone so the law is not changing! Mickey Mouse, Long a Symbol in Copyright Wars, to Enter Public Domain