Hello from First Street, where the Supreme Court is hearing oral argument in former president Donald Trump’s presidential immunity appeal (Trump v. U.S.) this morning.
I'm in attendance for @lawfare. No electronics in the courtroom, but Lawfare Senior Editors…
Hyemin
318 posts
- Lawfare will track the Supreme Court's docket on the Trump Disqualification Tracker as the case progresses. lawfaremedia.org/current-projec…:Breaking: The U.S. Supreme Court granted Trump's petition for writ of certiorari to review the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling disqualifying him from the state's primary ballot. Oral arguments are set for Feb. 8. Read the order, from @hyeminjhan. lawfaremedia.org/article/suprem…
- Trump is off the state's primary ballot in Illinois after a circuit court judge overturned the Circuit Court of Cook County of the Electoral Board's decision (but the decision is stayed pending appeal(s)). Ruling is on @Lawfare: lawfaremedia.org/article/trump-… lawfaremedia.org/current-projec…
- Just now, Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows has disqualified Trump from the 2024 primary ballot, making Maine the second state to have removed him from a primary ballot. Read the order, from @hyeminjhan. lawfaremedia.org/article/trump-…
- Today was the last day amicus briefs could’ve been filed in support of the Anderson Respondents in Trump v. Anderson. (Those in support of Trump or of neither party were due 1/18). They are all on the Trump Disqualification Tracker:
- Here to do my partReplying to @AnnaBowerIt’s a @lawfare team effort today! @rparloff will live-tweet from the media room. I’ll be observing in the in-person courtroom. And @hyeminjhan will pen an excessively detailed dispatch of what occurred!
- I asked two scholars who could not disagree more, the great @samuelmoyn & @IlyaSomin to discuss the political and philosophical issues overlaying Sec. 3 Trump disqualification efforts and how this should inform SCOTUS’s decision in Trump v. Anderson:
- Talked to a lot of people at SCOTUS before watching oral argument yesterday for this @Lawfare dispatch-analysis because this is a case about voters. Our deep dive on what each justice focused on and why the fate is likely sealed in favor of Trump:
- While Trump was in Iowa campaigning yesterday, his lawyers were in Judge Tanya Chutkan's courtroom, debating what his First Amendment rights are as both a presidential candidate and a criminal defendant:
- Replying to @hyeminjhan… @rparloff @qjurecic @ARozenshtein @nkorpett are recording a debrief podcast right after arguments end, at 1pm. Watch their livestream here:
- Replying to @hyeminjhan @rparloff and 3 othersYou can watch the argument, which begins at 10am, via CSPAN: c-span.org/video/?534673-…
- In a 2007 interview w/a “clean team,” suspected USS Cole bombing organizer Nashiri allegedly confessed to the crime. But a judge ruled in August that the confession can’t be used—because it is still tainted by prior CIA torture. How we got here, @lawfare:
- Replying to @hyeminjhan @rparloff and 3 othersWe’re here today because one of Trump’s October motions to dismiss special counsel Jack Smith’s Jan. 6 case argued that presidents enjoy absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for acts that are performed within the “outer perimeter” of their official responsibility...
- Replying to @hyeminjhan @rparloff and 3 othersOn Dec. 1, Judge Chutkan rejected the idea that presidents are endowed with absolute immunity. She said nothing in the Constitution or allocation of govt powers calls for “cloak[ing]” former pres's from the “solemn” criminal justice process. Opinion: documentcloud.org/documents/2460…








