Pinned
Francesco Sebregondi 🔎
2,912 posts
Francesco Sebregondi 🔎
@fsbrg
Architect × Researcher: violence, technology, and the city | Founder, @index_ngo | formerly @ForensicArchi | PhD @CentreResArch | @EnsadLab | EN/FR
- Replying to @fsbrg
- Replying to @fsbrgAnd let us remember the murder of Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh by an Israeli soldier in may 2022, for which Israel blamed Pal militants before admitting responsibility 4 months later : 16/x
- Replying to @fsbrgFinally, we should take into account the testimony of surgeon @GhassanAbuSitt1 , who had just moved to the Al-Ahli hospital from Shifa that morning and was operating as the hospital was hit. 17/x
- Replying to @fsbrgNow, let's look at the available information that would point to #Israel's responsibility in this blast First, the @IDF actually already bombed the hospital on 14/10, as a "warning" to evacuate, as @lemondefr has reported. 12/x lemonde.fr/en/internation…
- Replying to @fsbrgFor the historians here, the "no crater" argument painfully resonates with the negationist argument of Robert Faurisson : no holes (visible in the roof structures of Auschwitz) = no gas chambers = no Holocaust. See @weizman_eyal key analysis of this invalid argument (after RJVP)
- Replying to @fsbrg
- Replying to @fsbrgReplying to @GeoConfirmedHello and thanks for this analysis. How do you establish a causal link between the mid-air rocket explosion, and the massive explosion that you geolocated at the site of the hospital ? How do you rule out simultaneity between two events : rocket fire and IDF bombing ?
- Replying to @fsbrgThis post - aggregating several geolocation efforts – appears to conclude that it was PAL rocket misfire based on mere *synchronicity* between a visible rocket fire over Gaza and the explosion geolocated on the site of the hospital. 2/x x.com/GeoConfirmed/s…
- Replying to @fsbrgIt does not seem possible, based on the data used by @GeoConfirmed, to discard the hypothesis of two synchronous events – one rocket fire and one targeted bombing – with no causal links between them. 4/x
- Replying to @fsbrgFor the record : This comment/analysis is strictly personal and does not represent the position of any org or institution that I am, or have been, affiliated with.
