Cost physics. Satellite is great at giving good capacity over large area but doesn't do well concentrating capacity in dense locations. Our mid-level plan is 2gbps for ~$25 per month. Starlink is an amazing system but different tool for different market.
Much in the way you don't hammer in a screw, you won't LEO constellation in an apartment building. Different tools for different use cases. Current Telcos have a big hammer and have peculiar vision impairment that sees the world as a vast sea of nails.
We're not super public in the marketing now since we're still figuring out how best to articulate it to an end user. Most people are fine with 1-10gbps for now but there is the odd lunatic with a 100G homelab that we're happy to serve.
Broad strokes pretty on point. Basically boils down to getting as much of the network as possible on switch ASICs and abstracting the higher order network functions x86 based servers out of the clutches of the vendors. And doing a lot of engineering to make redundancy elegant
Hey Jaime! I'm the CEO of Somos. Would love to hear more about the problems you were having with stability so the engineering team and I can fix it. Send me a dm 👍