Liberal of the Kantian variety. Legal, moral and political philosophy. He, she or they are all fine. An it only to my friends. ππΊπ¦ π΅πΈ πΉπΌ π³οΈβππ³οΈββ§οΈπ΄
There is evidence that the IDF forcibly undresses palestinian women and films them naked on a systematic basis for blackmail purposes, by the way. It comes up in various reports by NGOs and the UN.
Greta Thunberg: βIsraeli soldiers hit, kicked, starved, and tortured meβ
β’ They placed a flag next to me, and anytime the flag touched me, they kicked me
β’ Whenever I raised my head to look at Ben-Gvir, I was kicked
β’ She was filmed while stripped naked
β’ Prison was
Love this trend. Did Trump get more votes? Uh, no, fewer. Maybe he won with black men? No, they overwhelmingly went for the dems. Perhaps with gen z white men... no? Ok then what was it? Oh, the dems managed to lose like 10 million voters since the last elections to abstentionπ¬
Piracy is literally the main thing worth praise about the internet. It's unequivocally extremely good. It means freeer and more equal access to culture for people who would otherwise have no access to it, it means functional academic research,it means a vibrant creative community
democrats stop deflating the overwhelmingly progressive voter base of your jury-rigged coalition by adopting asinine right wing positions and / or refusing to make concrete liberal political commitments challenge [impossible]
It doesn't matter what americans generally report about whether Harris is more or less "liberal". What matters is that she ran on an aggressively centrist platform of rapproachement and lost 10M voters even while the third party vote collapsed, and Trump also lost votes from 2020
The reason some people are venerating representational art is that they literally can not understand the point of creative work and so can only evaluate art in terms of competence at meeting a particular standard (like a sport) of which photo-realism is the easiest to adjudicate.
You see, you can't change your sex, you can only change virtually all of the primary and secondary sex characteristics that are constitutive of it in often radical ways, which is different
This is very unintentionally funny, given how half a century implies none of the individuals in the first case are the same as those in the latter. Yet here you are crying about being bullied in 1980 (when you didn't exist) by people that also didn't exist.
People point out that intentionally destroying brand recognition as competitors are popping up is a catastrophic business decision, but actually it is very characteristic of a man who never created anything and has spent decades trying to take credit for the work of other people.
The idea that sexual assault permanently ruins survivors is just a patriarchal purity trope. It's a major violation and one of the most serious ways someone can wrong another, but no, it's not an irreparable harm that forever sullies the victim and symbolically ends their life.