Replying to @LibertarianG0th
He'd listen if the courts said something was unconstitutional, though.
Dave 8x7B
24K posts
Dave 8x7B
@dave_alive
I'm an old software dev. Meme fan. Politically unaffiliated. Married. AI curious. Fitness geek. 🏳️🌈🇺🇸 Non-interventionist
Pittsburgh
Joined August 2013
- Replying to @NahBabyNahNah and @NahBabyNahYou expected us not to notice that dividing by 1/2 = multiplying by 2
- Replying to @jmhorpDextromethorphan Hydrobromide (OTC cough medicine) is zero atoms away from heroin, it's just an exact chiral mirror of it.
- Replying to @GoodRedditI think they feel like they're adding "realism" to the kid's struggle, but if you need a friggin' thesaurus to find the word to use, it probably isn't actually adding realism.
- Replying to @GlobeEyeNewsI don't believe it. Each kind of cancer is different. Grows under different conditions, spreads under different conditions, is triggered for different reasons. A vaccine for 'cancer' doesn't even pass the smell test. It's like saying you have a vaccine for 'sickness'
- Replying to @tonyposnanskiHaha, this reminds me of the scene in Back to the Future where Marty is talking about Reagan being president and Doc Brown stops short and says, "The actor?!?"
- Replying to @Angry_Stafferalso, they shot first. that makes them the bad guy without any of the rest of that
- Replying to @erikphoelI have read about people being charged with negligence as a result of a CPS visit for 'letting their kids play in the backyard unattended.' I always thought it was an exaggeration.
- Replying to @lcamtufNo you can't. There's a formula (least squares regression) for finding the line of best fit and computing the r factor to boot. what'll they come up with next?
- Replying to @adonis_singhWhat percentage of the time you ask it to pick a random 2 digit number does it choose 37 or 73? The reason I ask is because that's what humans do too.
- Replying to @MomAngtradesI'm betting it's trump who burned the bridges. $300million campaign financing is nothing to sneeze at
- That is actually a bad tool for the job. Lots of false positives. There aren't any tools in existence that can accurately detect chatbots. You can ruin someone's whole career with one false positive.
- Replying to @oliverburdickIt shows up in literally every species that reproduces sexually so God has a lot of explaining to do.
- Replying to @SWENGDADI'd think it means they succeeded. Most C-sections aren't done because that's what they want to do. It's because it's the only way to make sure they're alive. Medically necessary procedure resulting in living baby and mother = success.