user avatar
Andrew Small
@ajwsmall
Asia Director @ECFR / previously @EU_Commission @gmfus / China, Europe-US, Indo-Pacific
Berlin, Germany
Joined February 2008
Posts
  • user avatar
    It was hard this week not to think back to the CAI drama in December, when Germany/France jammed the agreement through in the window before the Biden administration took office, taking advantage of Xi's interest in pre-emptively spiking US coalition-building on China 1/
    The Biden-Harris administration would welcome early consultations with our European partners on our common concerns about China's economic practices.
  • user avatar
    "Sino-Indian relations can never go back to the old normal"
    What does the clash at the China-India border mean for the countries' plans to disengage? How could the conflict impact the future of Chinese-Indian relations? Ashley J. Tellis explains:
    00:00
  • user avatar
    Chinese officials in meetings with EU counterparts "made clear that the use of nuclear weapons by Russia would be viewed as totally unacceptable in Beijing". From the latest @noahbarkin newsletter (always a must-read but this one is a must-must-read...) email.gmfus.org/rv/ff009a5b4b9…
  • user avatar
    A few quick thoughts on how China is likely to deal with the current situation in South Asia (since I am getting some questions along the lines of: "is the Chinese approach still the same as the one laid out in your book?" which is now more than ten years old...) 1/10
  • user avatar
    UK threatened with "retaliatory responses" from Beijing if Huawei is excluded, Chinese government views it as "a test stone of bilateral ties". China Daily editorial: chinadaily.com.cn/a/202005/24/WS…
  • user avatar
    My piece in @ForeignAffairs on China, India, and the pushback against the Belt and Road in South Asia:
  • user avatar
    This is the best article out there on the current state of play with CPEC - and I hope part of moving people away from talking about it being a "$62bn initiative". The real numbers in play now are still significant but much less than that:
  • user avatar
    As soon as that Zhou Bo op-ed appeared - ft.com/content/f05fef… - I suspected that China had now figured out how to use the Russian threats of nuclear weapons use to its advantage, and Xi’s statement today exemplifies this 1/12
  • user avatar
    Personal news: I'm excited to start a secondment to the European Commission next week! I'll be taking up a fellowship at IDEA, the advisory hub that reports to the President of the European Commission, as part of a new program to tap external expertise on China-related issues 1/2
  • user avatar
    The fact that China clearly supports Russia would not preclude them taking a mediation role. Beijing typically does this precisely when it’s sympathetic to one side but thinks they’ve gone too far. But there are other reasons I doubt this will happen 1/
    It is highly questionable, indeed, how China could be mediating in a conflict in which they have taken a principal stance on the aggressor's side. Not a very good idea, @JosepBorrellF.
  • user avatar
    I can't post the full chapter from the book but a few disconnected snippets in this thread below capture the early China-Taliban interactions when they were last in power, and I hope provide some helpful context. Some of the central issues have not changed since. 1/4
  • user avatar
    Replying to @ajwsmall
    Xi has made his bet - that given China’s strategic landscape, there is a price worth paying for the Sino-Russian partnership. No amount of articles on what various sections of the Chinese ”foreign policy community” think or what we think China’s “real” interests are obviate that
  • user avatar
    In light of US cutting off funds to Pakistan, the argument in this piece on China’s reaction still applies – Beijing will be more supportive than in the past, but contrary to some recent commentary, it will NOT be happy. Why? : scmp.com/week-asia/geop… 1/9
  • user avatar
    Whatever schadenfreude China may be experiencing around the way the withdrawal from Afghanistan has been handled by the US, this is not the outcome that China wanted. I give context here: china-global.simplecast.com/episodes/episo… and here: ecfr.eu/article/after-… 1/5