Former BBC correspondent and presenter. Commentator on constitutional and royal issues for outlets including @LBC, @ObserverUK, @theipaper and @Telegraph.
Much of the UK media will portray this eviction as a righteous act by a strong king.
It’s anything but.
Instead of building bridges the head of state is torching them.
The banishment of his son is cruel, unnecessary and diminishes Charles.
The terms of Harry and Meghan’s exit were cruel. The institution made a mistake and will pay a price over time. But the royals don’t see it –in part, because much of the media insist, incessantly, that the blame lies with the Sussexes and Charles and William are beyond reproach.
The second half of Harry and Meghan's Netflix docuseries aired today, and we've been taking you through the highlights
Here are some of the key moments you may have missed ⬇
A pilloried prince has exposed criminality.
The media should thank Harry and many of them should reflect on their relentlessly skewed coverage of him.
The royals failed to back Harry and should reflect on whether their pursuit of positive headlines clouded their judgement.
This is a very serious error of judgement by King Charles and his advisors.
He’s abandoned his unifying role and entered the political fray, in a foolish bid to be seen as statesmanlike.
History won’t be kind. Someone’s head will roll.
🔺EXCLUSIVE: King Charles and his eldest son make millions from feudal levies on schools, hospitals, homeowners and the very charities they represent, a joint investigation by The Sunday Times and @C4Dispatches reveals today thetimes.com/uk/royal-famil…