Pinned
Buraq Doctrine
25.2K posts
Buraq Doctrine
@The_SharkSlayer
Aircraft, Air Defense, Asymmetric Warfare.
Free Palestine. Caffeine, Bad Choices, Malicious Intent & Questionable Morals. RTs≠Endorsements.
NAFOD.
Taken, No DMS
مملکتِ خدا داد پاکستان
Joined September 2012
- I'd believe everything my Indian friends say... if they could explain why they put the aft section of their own MiG-21 on display with a Pakistani flag, pretending it's a captured F-6. (Fun fact: F-6s had two engines. MiG-21s don’t.)
- Replying to @IDFIndians that were standing with israel; right after admin posted this image 🤣
- Sindoor or Dust? Operation Sindoor didn’t redraw maps. But it redrew the margins of risk, restraint, & rhetoric. India tested the boundaries. Pakistan reinforced them with calm hands and clear eyes. Let’s break it down. What changed, what cracked and what’s next... (1/12)
- 1. They were Pakistani jets 2. No Indian jets were shot down 3. They were target drones 4. All Pakistani propaganda 5. They were parts of missiles 6. Sarr operation sindoor sucks ass. 🫠🫠🫠 7. We lost 1 jet 8. Maybe we lost 2 jets 9. Losses are part of combat 10. We didn'tIndia’s military confirmed for the first time that it lost an unspecified number of fighter jets in clashes with Pakistan in May. Anil Chauhan, chief of defense staff of the Indian Armed Forces, spoke to Bloomberg TV on Saturday, while attending the Shangri-La Dialogue in
00:00 - Indians still can't wrap their heads around the fact that they lost 6 aircraft to an enemy they didn't expect, all while flying well within their airspace. Their comms were jammed, radio chatter intercepted and recorded for the world. They had no idea from where and how fast
- One Country Bought Weapons, The Other Built a War Machine. . Everyone here loves talking about India’s gorgeous Rafales and deadly S-400s. They look sleek. They sound deadly. But modern warfare doesn’t care how your toys look. It cares about how they coordinate attacks. (1/12)
- Pakistan's Catch 22 Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. -Albert Einstein A living breathing example of this saying can be seen in Pakistan's Foreign Policy especially when it comes to Afghanistan. (1/N)
- Why is it that after every low-intensity scrap with Pakistan, India doesn’t question its doctrine, its leadership, or its intel, just its hardware? 2019: "If only we had Rafales…" 2024: "If only we had 5th-gen fighters…" You launched op sindoor, you didn't decide what your
- India thinks they can “turn off the tap and stop Indus from flowing towards Pakistan.” As if the Indus is a water cooler they can lean on at will. Spoiler: it isn’t. 🧵 A thread on water, war, and why you can’t choke a river that doesn’t answer to you. (1/9)
- Silencing The Growler... NATO called it the "SA21 Growler" At Adampur AFS, India stationed its pride: the S-400 Triumph. The chilling hum of radar swept skies over Northern Punjab. Standing tall seeing everything that flew within 600kms. PAF knew they had to blind it. (1/N)
- Rafales were forced off encrypted comms, making them fallback to VHF/UHF links. Result? PAF picked up the "secure" chatter in real-time. This wasn't some sci-fi novel but some common sense and top class ingenuity by PAF. They started broadcasting gibberish on their spectrum...
- Dear Indians When our AVM referenced Clausewitz, You Indians heard physics. No wonder your Cold Start never warms up... your understanding of military theory is stuck in 1857. What's the point of having a gazillion IITs and IIMs if you can't grasp the concept of basic idiomatic
