Replying to @TMZ
Feel like pretty much everyone is on Jason's side here?
Rational Thinker 69
65.3K posts
Rational Thinker 69
@Rationalist69
Ha! Ha! I'm using the internet!!!
Joined February 2017
- Replying to @MarshallCohenLol when you're arguing it was legal because it's basically a scam
- Replying to @SwannMarcus89I like how thoroughly polite greg here about obvious matters as well. Somehow sets Catturd off more
- Replying to @RyanSheadThe courts performed fine here. You can find Kyle annoying but it was clear this was a self-defense case when the video became available like two weeks after the events occurred.
- Replying to @whateverFor people who don't know this is based on a viral 4chan post on IQ (take it however you will). But, here's the thing, it's not a hypothetical for the intended girl in the misunderstanding way described here, and her answer at the end is...fine. She's right. Weak 'own' attempt.
- Replying to @esjesjesjIf trained people without guns showed up they'd be dead, I imagine.
- Replying to @Shallie_Abbiusi and @jackTaking the issue right to the top of the chain I see
- Replying to @StatisticUrbanThe proliferation of a distinct, easily identifiable "AI voice" can be grating, especially when it's unaltered or poorly masked. The problem is compounded when it replaces idiosyncratic human tone with something generic, overpolished, or tonally mismatched to the context.
- Replying to @_x_takes_Good job anticipating an objection and responding to it, I admit
- Replying to @lxeagle17 and @JasonKParginI give her credit for posting a non-herd poll, tbh. It will give legitimate insight into polling at large
- Replying to @ArmandDomaThompson letting the burn linger with subtle acknowledgement instead of bringing attention to it, very zen
- Replying to @ManishaKrishnanUh that sounds horrible...is there video anywhere, to, uh, sympathize with?
- Replying to @StatisticUrbanHalf of Fraiser's plotlines could be completely handled with a simple clarifying text sent on the DL