>Watching a fantasy book review channel
>Puts Lord of the rings as the number 4 most overrated fantasy book.
>His main complaints are it's got too many appendices and the stories clichéd.
>See comments saying if it came out today, very few people would read it.
I'm starting to see fantasy readers turn on LoTR more and more. Mainly going "it's boring! Its Clichéd! It's generic! Its too dense!" Ect ect. They'll read hundreds of books and spend no time with them beyond the words on the page. Depth hurts them.
It's because the past was more innocent. I know people want to pretend it wasn't, but a lot of people didn't interpret everything as sinister as we do now. Hell we call women who are 25 dating someone 35 as groomed or it being paedophilia.
You have made a video in which the "joke" is to kill furries and characters from a children's series, and then you wonder why Ludo Studios take down your video?
Yup. He actually made it about "straight pride parades" which was funny because that also didn't match what he was making the comic about. Straight pride parades didn't demand to be part of LGBT spaces.
Yes but do we expect leftists to ever admit that a piece of media critises them and isn't just fascism if it does. Their whole worldview is binary. Its lefitsm or fascism.
The funniest thing about communists is they will be just as bad about denial of the atrocities committed by their ideology but will act so morally righteous in condemning "nazis". And yes Stalin was a pedo who knocked up a child.