Partygate-related resignations by officials:
1. Allegra Stratton, Govt spokesperson
2. John Penrose, Govt 'anti-corruption tsar'
3. Lord Geidt, Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards
Resignations so far by politicians under doctrine of ministerial responsibility:
None
Mark Elliott
7,940 posts
Professor of Public Law, University of Cambridge. Fellow, St Catharine's College, Cambridge. Author of publiclawforeveryone.com
- Attorney General @SuellaBraverman still hasn’t resigned, but she has broken her recent silence on the Internal Market Bill by publishing a statement of HM Government’s ‘legal position’ on it. It runs to one side of A4. And it is utterly risible. /1 assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
- 'This is one of the most remarkable interviews I've ever conducted!' James O'Brien is blown away as Professor Mark Elliott explains why the Government lacks legal authority to dump the Northern Ireland protocol. @mrjamesob | @ProfMarkElliott
00:00 - I find this concerning, since it undermines the constitutional principle that the Government must be able to command the confidence of the House of Commons: a principle that requires the Opposition, when appropriate, to be able to test that confidence via a vote. /1BREAKING: Boris Johnson has blocked Labour's bid to hold vote of no confidence in Govt tomorrow Senior Labour source: "It's just another example of them ripping up the rules to protect their own side. They're saying he's going anyway but they're clearly frightened of losing".
- Implication that Police should think more carefully before issuing someone with a fixed penality because they're the PM is abhorrent to the rule of law. 'Every man, whatever be his rank or condition, is subject to the ordinary law of the realm' (Dicey) x.com/paul__johnson/…
- Replying to @ProfMarkElliottThe UK may have left the EU, but it has not left the community of nations or the rules-based international order. Treaty obligations are binding upon the UK, and to suggest that they are not ‘because Parliament is sovereign’ is as embarrassing as it is dangerous. /ends
- I see Attorney-General @SuellaBraverman & Lord Chancellor @RobertBuckland still haven't resigned from a Government intent on undermining the rule of law. I was going to say that's quite extraordinary — but it's now just par for the course. Not a political point. Just a fact.
- Extraordinary. A Cabinet Minister—in conversation with the PM's sister—boasting about her ignorance of the system for upholding the Ministerial Code, trivialising Lord Geidt's resignation & implying that standards in public life are an elite concern.
- I'm pleased to be a signatory to this letter to the Times. We argue that the recent decision to prorogue Parliament sets a dangerous precedent and is incompatible with the core UK constitutional principle of executive accountability to Parliament.
- There are 3 fundamental problems with this. First, it implies being bound by treaty obligations is incompatible with sovereignty, whereas entering into such obligations is actually an exercise of sovereignty. Sovereignty is a resource to be used, not a relic to be venerated. /1We must restore full UK sovereignty and safeguard the Belfast Agreement. That means dealing with the Northern Ireland Protocol #Suella4leader
- What is ‘elite’ about pointing out that @SuellaBraverman is advocating two entirely inconsistent policies, and that each of them would involve breaches of international law? If ‘making sense’ and ‘obeying the law’ are now elitist, we really are in deep trouble.The elite are going feral. Keep up the good work @SuellaBraverman
- I find this opinion on the Johnson Privileges Committee matter very odd. Much of it is concerned with the fact that the Committee's process may not adhere to legal standards that are wholly inapplicable to a political, parliamentary process. /1 assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
- Does the PM’s refusal to resign mean the UK is in a ‘constitutional crisis’? That’s a vague notion, but I think the answer is that it implies he’s willing to create one very soon. Another way of framing the question is: At what point *must* Boris Johnson resign? /1
- Keir Starmer has just told BBC News that if Boris Johnson attempts to stay on pending the leadership election, the Opposition will hold a parliamentary vote of no confidence. That is the proper constitutional mechanism for immediate removal of Johnson as PM, as explained here.If the leadership election takes several months, such that Johnson would remain PM until October, and if that is considered unacceptable, it would be open for a vote of no confidence to be held in the House of Commons. /1










