How ignorant can you be?
@SauniR6@OFReapiin I hope you guys can learn and understand the role you guys are in and actually play it. With big named figures in the community like @fettR6S using you in there videos, leagues like rpl relying on your input, the influence you give
Further proving my point on how uneducated they are!!
You guys have a big platform in the siege com, you abuse that fact and make things up for your benefit which betrays peoples trust.
@OFReapiin @caughtbyamaze
Below you will find a video of me using system informer, every
1. Misleading the community needs to stop. Claiming to be working on dma detection for a year and having those capabilities meanwhile sending "evidence" of Journal logs is just glossing over actual proof by sending something that looks technical. Keeping methods privates is one
7. When you position yourself as an authority in the anticheat space, you take on a responsibility not just to spot suspicious behavior, but to do it right. And right now? You’re not ready. Talking about building anticheats when you haven’t even mastered the fundamentals of
Since people dont think there is enough proof or the screenshots are fake here is a video covering it. Why would reapiin not be taking a bribe if he has a 14 min video of him catching lovzy cheating, then says he agreed not to post for some cash app. Nothing is taken out of
An amazing video, it’s actually nice being able to watch a video that’s not scripted from a third person perspective.
This exposes reapiin and backs my statements even further, I recommend everybody to watch with open ears and to not be bias.
I will be bringing out more
2. Sauni you openly post a log of someone being on "dma" yet dont even know what the device is that you think is suspicious. Validation on devices is a must, sometimes I forget how empty headed you guys are. DMA devices spoof as all different kids of devices, there is plenty of
6. People opting out of pc checks might raise eyebrows but that’s not proof of wrongdoing. At most it might breach that communities policy for dodging a pc check but its not validation for cheat accusation. Dragging names based solely on non-compliance is lazy detective work and
4. Not showing the methods you are working on is GOOD for your private tool, I agree. But if you are going to publicly post the contents of someone's computer in which i hope you have consent for the pc check, you need to be able to lead the community in the right direction