user avatar
Karl Pfleger
@KarlPfleger
Founder of nonprofit AgingBiotech.info Investor in rejuvenation startups: portfolio on LinkedIn Organizer of VitaminDforAll.org AI/ML Stanford PhD & ex-Google
San Francisco
Joined March 2020
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    The 2 Longevity Fields... New post on a topic of great importance. Long, but something I feel strongly about. Broadly Slowing Aging vs. Divide-and-Conquer Rejuvenation: How to tell the difference and why acknowledging both matters (link in next post)
  • user avatar
    A surprising 97% of adults in India are vitamin D insufficient, <30ng/ml, the Endocrine Soc min. For elders: 98%<30 & 91%<20 (clinical deficiency). See ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/Pโ€ฆ How many fewer would be dying in India if basic deficiency/insufficiency had been remedied?
  • user avatar
    Short report: The state of the mitochondria portion of the aging biotech field: 50 companies! $1.4+B raised 700+ people 150+ clinical trials many MoAs/targets: mitophagy, transplant, fission, NAD+, UrolithinA, CD38, PINK1, PPARฮด, DRP1, USP30, Complex 1, OMA1, & more Read on:
  • user avatar
    The aging field doesn't discuss enough the key top-level distinction between the 2 main therapeutic paradigms: slow aging or reverse it. I support slowing aging as much better than traditional medicine, but it pains me to see many in the field disparage or ignore reversal & I
  • user avatar
    At this point, it is beyond question that Vitamin D Deficiency (VDD) is a significant risk factor for Covid just like age, obesity, comorbidities. Many dozens of studies show this & correlation-doesn't-imply-causation isn't a valid objection to classification as a risk factor. ๐Ÿงต
  • user avatar
    A 2nd important recent longevity development that is too-little discussed in the field: The first 2 FDA approved allogeneic stem cell therapies, both in past 2 years. - off-the-shelf - mass-producible - likely relevant for multiple age-related pathologies This is important!
  • user avatar
    There are now (at min) 4 big systematic meta-analyses of vitamin D & Covid since Dec'21. 3 study D levels & 2 supplementation. Newest both. Strong, consistent, & highly statistically significant results: Low D raises & supplementation lowers all stages of Covid risk by ~1.5-3x ๐Ÿงต
  • user avatar
    Announcing a new open letter: Over 100 scientists, doctors & authorities call for more vitamin D for COVID-19. 50+ professors. 50+ medical doctors. Many of the most renowned vitamin D experts in the world. 19 countries. vitamind4all.org/letter.html Clear call to action #VitaminDforAll
  • user avatar
    It's 2025 & I'm getting excited & even optimistic for the next 5 years in the aging/longevity sector based on looking around at what's going on. It's not that the ultimate solutions will emerge that quickly, but the seeds of huge change may be upon the world soon.
  • user avatar
    The Economist this week has 2 articles on human enhancement, inc longevity. It's even the cover story. Good! But longevity isย lumped in w/ sport & cognitive enhancement & BCI. The label superhuman is used. So not the focus piece on aging's horrors the field deserves. Details:
  • user avatar
    Direct-to-consumer aging clocks give very inconsistent answers. I tried TruDiagnostic, Elysium, GlycanAge, & reg blood draw for PhenoAge on same day in Feb & from same venous blood draw at LabCorp, except Elysium's uses saliva which I did right before going to LabCorp. Notes: ๐Ÿงต
  • user avatar
    There's controversy over whether aging should be classified as a disease. I'm doing a debate on it tonight. Complex question with many angles. Here's a document with thoughts from several perspectives to try to help move the global conversation forward:
  • user avatar
    Replying to @DrSamuelBHume
    Now stratify by dose, BMI, baseline 25OHD, whether study titrated dose to achieve 25OHD>20ng/ml or ideally 30ng, & whether outcomes only recorded after enough time for dose to achieve sufficiency. Meta-analyses of flawed studies give flawed answers. See
    Data from the new TargetD trial suggests that prior vitamin D trials were flawed: news-medical.net/news/20231113/โ€ฆ Many people, even professionals, still think vitamin D was a false profit that was disproven by big RCTs. This view is very flawed, for several reasons. A brief history:
  • user avatar
    Replying to @DrJBhattacharya
    Booster requirements based on shot count w/o regard to recency of last dose are now indefensible, as are rules not counting prior infections (for non elderly/immunocompromised). Good new Aug31 NEJM review nejm.org/doi/full/10.10โ€ฆ No evidence boosting long ago reduces transmission.