user avatar
Carrie Severino
@JCNSeverino
President of JCN (@judicialnetwork). Co-Author of Justice on Trial. RT ≠ endorsement. I probably should include something witty here.
Washington, DC
Joined April 2010
Posts
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    🚨 Just In: The Supreme Court ruled 8-0 in Chevron USA v. Plaquemines Parish, with Justice Thomas writing the majority opinion. Judge Oldham's dissent is vindicated. Yet another scheme by the climate lobby to weaponize the courts and forum-shop has been thwarted. Chevron will
  • user avatar
    Doocy: "These activists posted a map with the home addresses of the Supreme Court justices. Is that the sort of thing this President wants?" Psaki: "I think the President's view is that there is a lot of passion." Disgusting that the White House is refusing to condemn this.
    00:00
  • user avatar
    Senator @HawleyMO: "Do you think it's wrong to discriminate on the basis of religious faith?" Biden’s district judge nominee for D.C Loren AliKhan: "Absolutely." Senator Hawley: "Then why did you argue that religious services and religious people pose a greater risk of
    00:00
  • user avatar
    If you think Justice Clarence Thomas would ever bow to the left-wing mob targeting him, go back and watch this legendary clip of his 1991 confirmation hearing: Senator Hatch: “What’s Clarence Thomas going to do?” Justice Thomas: “I’d rather die than withdraw… not for the
    00:00
  • user avatar
    Happy Birthday to Justice Thomas, an American hero and fearless defender of our Constitution!
  • user avatar
    Justice Sotomayor just told an ABA audience that “Our job is to stand up” and that “we can’t lose the battles we are facing.” Also: “We need trained and passionate and committed lawyers to fight this fight.” That makes a mockery of any appearance of objectivity in cases
  • user avatar
    Justice Thomas to his critics in the media: “I will absolutely leave the Court when I do my job as poorly as you do yours.”
    00:00
    John Oliver offers Justice Thomas millions to 'get the f--- off the Supreme Court' trib.al/XBTAWVq
  • user avatar
    WATCH: @SenJohnKennedy: “You said, ‘assault weapons may be banned because they’re extraordinarily dangerous and are not appropriate for legitimate self-defense purposes.’ Tell me what you meant by assault weapons?” Biden’s Seventh Circuit judge nominee Nancy Maldonado: “I’m not
    00:00
  • user avatar
    Clarence Thomas is a descendant of West African slaves. He was born into poverty and grew up in the Jim Crow south. Nevertheless, he rose to become one of the greatest Supreme Court justices in American history. We should tell his incredible story in every classroom.
    02:09
    To celebrate Black History Month, watch the documentary below & read up on Justice Clarence Thomas, our greatest Justice & greatest living American. Start by watching Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words & reading these 4 books (links below):👇
  • user avatar
    🚨President Biden’s district judge nominee Sara Hill was unable to explain to @SenJohnKennedy the difference between a “stay order” and an “injunction.” How can an individual who wants to be a federal judge possibly not know this? Senator Durbin even congratulated Hill
    00:00
  • user avatar
    Must Watch: Justice Amy Coney Barrett sets the record straight on the majority's message to the American people in the Dobbs decision: “The central message of Dobbs: Dobbs did not render abortion illegal. Dobbs did not say anything about whether abortion is immoral. Dobbs said
    00:00
  • user avatar
    And so it begins… Texas takes the sensible step of ending the ABA’s stranglehold on law school accreditation. Rather than outsourcing this important gatekeeping role to a liberal activist group with a history of attempts to circumvent federal free speech and equal protection
  • user avatar
    The reported draft opinion is thoughtful, scholarly, and thorough. It does the work that the majority in Roe and Casey refused to do, looking to the Constitution itself to determine whether it includes a right to an abortion. The opinion concludes it does not. /1
  • user avatar
    Justice Scalia would be disappointed that his successor has bungled textualism so badly today, for the sake of appealing to college campuses and editorial boards. This was not judging, this was legislating—a brute force attack on our constitutional system. (1/x)