Replying to @jedihaloknight
Yes! All of my avatars are completely safe ^^ Any asset I use that I do not make myself I buy commercial licensing for and credit the appropriate creators.
Foxipaws
505 posts
- Replying to @ZefwanoHi there! This is completely incorrect ^^ I have plenty of wips and a base sculpt and everything . Please don’t spread misinformation about my models :)
- Replying to @Zefwano@TheRPGslayer pinging you as I figured this is relevant to you
- Replying to @Foxipaws_vr(4/5) 4. Since the body was meshed by another party, and the head by Slayer and me, the density of polys does not match as we didn't want to have way too many polygons on the head that didn't need to be there! So that's why the topo counts are different between the two regions.
- This turned out so so good oh my gosh <3 Thank you SO much!!!! <3 <3 <3 I'm in love with your work!
- Replying to @Foxipaws_vr(3/5) 3. If you look properly at the poles and stuff here you can see the topology is not the same at all. You've found points which are similar across many other creators models ( As Rose has shown in replies!)
- Replying to @Foxipaws_vr(2/5) 2. The texture kind of fits because of the shapes being similar due to the UV split, the head is a sphere with a frontal outcrop, there are only a few ways you can split that, and when split in a standard way the Uvs take a similar shape.
- Replying to @Zefwano(1/5) To summarize against your points. 1. The shape is nearly identical because of the center split UV unwrap, if you look properly you will see the polys themselves do not align, it is a simple island shape caused by the UVs being unwrapped in a very standard way.
- Replying to @Foxipaws_vr(5/5) You jumped the gun and made wrongful accusations. This is EXTREMELY damaging for creators who have done nothing wrong. Please consider reaching out to creators with your questions/concern/accusations before publicly posting incorrect information like this.
- Replying to @SussyOvernt and @pixie_pupsEvie by foxipaws on gumroad 🐰