Pinned
BLG Tweets
1,066 posts
Elite lawyers. Elite clients. Complex commercial corporate & litigation. Energy & Natural Resources. Industrials. Environmental. White collar.
Joined July 2023
- The prosecutors in @eithanhaim’s case are doubling down on their shameless effort to ask the court to censor us and our client on @X. We will continue to zealously represent @EithanHaim's liberty, and now his (and our) First Amendment right to Free Speech.
- Replying to @BurkeLawTweets1/ Specifically, the @TheJusticeDept wants the court to gag @EithanHaim's right to RT these fine patriots who have come to his defense on @X: @EdWhelanEPPC @MikeBenzCyber @RepDanCrenshaw @brianeharrison @jordanbpeterson @LeorSapir @MeritStreet @christopherrufo @KyleSeraphin -- all
- "Given the defendant’s national platform on @X, a change of venue would not alleviate the likelihood of prejudicing the jury." Is DOJ saying that they think a jury everywhere and anywhere is poisoned by our tweets? What a case! Make it make sense.Replying to @BurkeLawTweets7/ While the prosecution tries to make it sound like its gag order is reasonable, it would completely prevent Dr. Haim or his counsel from criticizing the prosecution, no matter how correct the criticism. The prosecution tries to make its case by painting Dr. Haim’s and the
- Replying to @BurkeLawTweets10/ We are as proud as ever to zealously represent @eithanhaim--we defend him in court filings, in our letter to Congress and DOJ, and here on @X--and we look forward to our hearing tomorrow opposing these ridiculous motions.
- Burke Law Group submitted an amicus brief in United States v. Skrmetti with a new argument that would resolve the case with a single sentence. 🧵
- Replying to @BurkeLawTweets2/ Today, @TheJusticeDept filed a reply supporting its motion for a gag order against our legal team and @EithanHaim. They dispute our charges of government misconduct, saying that we mischaracterize the facts. Yet much like previous censorship efforts by this administration, it
- Replying to @BurkeLawTweets3/ The prosecution begins by asserting that the defendant is advancing a “false narrative of government corruption.” But in the very next paragraph, the current prosecutors admit that they don’t actually know what happened until after Dr. Haim was indicted because the lead
- The United States has finally agreed to drop the case against Dr. Haim, and the Court just granted dismissal. The case has been dismissed with prejudice so that the federal government can never again come after him for blowing the whistle on the secret pediatric transgender
- Replying to @BurkeLawTweets7/ While the prosecution tries to make it sound like its gag order is reasonable, it would completely prevent Dr. Haim or his counsel from criticizing the prosecution, no matter how correct the criticism. The prosecution tries to make its case by painting Dr. Haim’s and the
- Replying to @BurkeLawTweets9/ The government’s hypocrisy gets worse. The government has sought to censor Dr. Haim in multiple ways and has filed several documents unnecessarily under seal, including the lead attorney’s motion to withdraw. Yet every time it has filed its indictments, it has included the
- Replying to @BurkeLawTweets8/ Burke Law Group is at the forefront of the campaign to stop pediatric transgender medical procedures. We are defending @eithanhaim from a federal felony prosecution stemming from his blowing the whistle on Texas Children’s Hospital for secretly performing those procedures. We
- Replying to @BurkeLawTweets4/ While the government attempts to identify “inaccuracies and mischaracterizations,” it is merely projecting its own propensity to confuse the truth for lies. One of the very first examples is that the government’s decision to prosecute Dr. Haim for coming forward publicly was
- Replying to @BurkeLawTweets8/ Also like in previous censorship campaigns, the government attempts to use safety concerns to shut down debate. It suggests that the “extreme rhetoric” could harm the career public prosecutors and federal agents who put felons away for a living, even though they have received























