You're avoiding his point. That if we settling ownership on ancient claims of land then it should apply to everybody and if that was the case, how far back do you want to go?
But if you start accepting claims made by one nationalist movement, which ones are you going reject. Also you very well know that the ancients claims are used as an excuse to remove any Palestiam claims to the land.
But your are accepting one over the other. This is what the two state solution formulation does. Accepted it may be the only way forward but by not accepting the basic structural nature of the formulation, you're embedding an inability to understand it.
Calling Hamilton little black guy, in a sentence where he names the white people, and is older than Verstappen. That is racism becuase the usage marks out his blackness and denigrate his experience. You need to stop making excuses.
I found this interesting, insightful, if not entirely convincing. Can BBC Bitesize now produce a similar video arguing white privilege is an unhelpful confection? Then I can weigh up both and come to a more considered, better informed view.
I have already said this. However, I am not Palestinian, I have been there however. The best thing for you to do is actually engage with the very articulate and deeply intelligent members of the Palestinian diaspora who have written extensively on this.
BAME colleague often have to put credentials up becuase it's default to believe they don't have them - even by fellow BAME. The amount of times I see folk addressed as Mrs or Mr for senior BAME academics is mental.
Calling it an emergency and ramping up the rhetoric is deeply political and unnecessary. Unless Javid plans to sail the ships himself we have a perfectly capable system to deal with these issues. Its base grandstanding on the backs of the destitute.
As said in reference to another tweet, I apologise if you feel that I have not done this. I still encourage to speak to the Palestinian literature which does expand on these themes.