user avatar
Alan Dershowitz
@AlanDersh
Professor at Harvard Law School for 50 years, now emeritus. Active in litigation, writing, and defense of civil liberties and human rights.
Cambridge, MA
Joined September 2011
Posts
  • user avatar
    I hope Epstein made videos There have been suggestions that Epstein made secret videos of all the men who had sex in his houses and planes. I hope he did and they are all revealed, because they will prove I am not among them. I hereby waive any right of privacy in Epstein videos.
  • user avatar
    Swetnick affidavit should be thoroughly investigated by the fbi and her alleged witnesses named and questioned. If perjured, there should be consequences.
  • user avatar
    Warren doesn’t understand the law. My former colleague, Senator Warren, claims she could not follow my carefully laid out presentation that everybody else seemed to understand. This says more about Warren than it does about me. (1 of 2)
  • user avatar
    I’m thinking of suing cnn for doctoring a video of me.
  • user avatar
    It is unconstitutional to use the 25th Amendment to circumvent impeachment provisions. The 25th can be used only if POTUS is physically or psychiatrically incapacitated. Any other use is unconstitutional. I challenge anyone to argue differently.
  • user avatar
    Flynn Was Innocent All Along: He Was Pressured to Plead Guilty
  • user avatar
    The only non partisan expert witness has been Professor Turley. It’s been 3 against 1, but thus far the 1 has been more objective and persuasive than the 3.
  • user avatar
    The Republicans should have challenged Professor Feldman’s assertion that “abuse of office" is a constitutional basis for impeachment. These words do not appear in the Constitution and such vague criteria were rejected by the Framers.
  • user avatar
    Kavanaugh owes an enormous debt to @MichaelAvenatti , who may have turned the tide in his favor by diluting Ford’s compelling accusation with an implausible story.
  • user avatar
    We should stop talking about obstruction of justice. No plausible case. We must distinguish crimes from pol sins
  • user avatar
    All civil libertarians who care about non partisan justice should support a new trial for Roger Stone based on this new information about a biased juror. Let’s hear from real, non partisan, civil libertarians.
  • user avatar
    The facts they presented were radically different from the facts presented in court. Live coverage of criminal trials serves as an important check and balance against the deliberate distortions of biased media commentators.
  • user avatar
    Tribe so afraid of the Senate hearing my constitutional arguments that he actually says, I “should not be allowed” to make them. Is that the American way?
  • user avatar
    I challenge my critics – especially those who are deliberately misinterpreting my arguments – to a Lincoln/Douglas-type town hall debate in which name calling is prohibited and intellectual arguments must be responded to with other intellectual arguments. (MTC)