Skip to main content Skip to footer

We use AI pragmatically, as a support tool. Common applications within our work include:

For example, generating first–draft outlines, summarising long documents, or exploring ways of phrasing a requirement. It saves time and surfaces possibilities whilst every output is reviewed and refined by a human before it’s used.

AI coding tools do not replace engineering judgement. All code is written, reviewed, and tested by a human developer who is responsible every aspect. It helps us work more efficiently, but accountability for every technical decision remains with us.

AI can help show us inconsistencies or highlight potential accessibility issues early on in our work. It improves consistency and flagging of issues but human expertise determines final decisions and fixes.

Decisions that affect user outcomes without human validation.

Processing or storing confidential client data without explicit consent.

Generating final copy that is published without careful expert review.

Design choices that require context, sensitivity, or institutional nuance.

If AI output cannot be verified, justified, or explained by a human expert, we do not rely on it.