
ISLAND AT THE EDGE OF THE WORLD
“Crisp, confident, and convincing” The New Yorker
“Striking… a stunning unraveling of many layers of hidden history” Publishers Weekly * review
“Magisterial” New York Times
HOW TO BUILD STONEHENGE
“A gripping archaeological detective story… tells us something eternal about the human spirit” Sunday Times
DIGGING FOR RICHARD III
“Writing this book must have been the dream of a lifetime for Pitts, and he has risen to the occasion” Kirkus * review
FAIRWEATHER EDEN
“Now, at last, we have a fossil story, and a fossil writer to rival the hegemony of the Africans” Sunday Telegraph
“A fascinating book” Desmond Morris

Thanks for visiting! This site is about archaeology (broadly defined), and things that catch the interest of a writer and an archaeologist who is lucky enough to work in journalism: I get to see and hear about amazing things before the rest of the world does, and to meet the people who find out about them. Over the years I’ve worked with museums, archaeology, lecturing, food, photography, radio and TV, writing, editing, lots of travel (including a total over a year in the Pacific, and three months in Madagascar; I once bought a house offshore from Vancouver Island), even a bit of farm work, and at one point I learnt to fly. But what really gets me going is hearing good stories, and I love telling them. I will never lose my interest in the things people do and make, shaping our past and our future.
Unless otherwise stated, all photos in this blog are by me, and my copyright (Corsica at top is by Hilary Howard, Stonehenge above is by my daughter, Mia).
HOW THE SITE WORKS
Posts are laid out in diary fashion, with the most recent at the front. You can access them this way by clicking on the Digging Deeper heading at the top.

I’ve also set up a few thematic headings. Under these I’ve pulled together links to related posts here, or to articles elsewhere, and sometimes I’ve written a bit about my work in that particular area. I can’t promise these are necessarily fully up to date.

You may find the search option more useful.

ABOUT ME
After many enjoyable years as a student in London (UCL Institute of Archaeology) I started out as a professional archaeologist and curator (the Alexander Keiller Museum in Avebury), directing excavations at Stonehenge and elsewhere. I left that to write, photograph and travel, setting up as a small publisher of guidebooks, postcards and a couple of cookbooks, and in the event helping to open and run a groundbreaking and very busy vegetarian restaurant (Stones, also in Avebury). We closed the restaurant in 2000, since when I have worked as an editor, writer and broadcaster specialising mainly in archaeology while continuing to conduct original research. I returned to dig at Stonehenge in 2008, and in 2012 led a new study of the large Easter Island statue in the British Museum.







I have written trade books Fairweather Eden (“This is an outstanding book”, Mail on Sunday non-fiction choice), Hengeworld (“A gem – witty, charming, urbane, informative”, British Archaeology), Digging for Richard III (starred by Kirkus Reviews, “An utterly compelling read”, Independent on Sunday), Digging up Britain (“Highly readable and hugely enjoyable… wonderfully evocative, British Museum Magazine), How to Build Stonehenge (“A gripping archaeological detective story… tells us something eternal about the human spirit”, Sunday Times), and most recently, Island at the Edge of the World (“Pitts’s wonder comes through on nearly every page… compelling… magisterial”, New York Times).

Travel diaries

I’ve published research articles in peer-reviewed journals such as Nature, Antiquity, World Archaeology, Journal of Archaeological Science and The Antiquaries Journal, and over the years I’ve written features for most UK newspapers and for magazines such as Wanderlust, BBC History, New Scientist and the American Archaeology. I edited Salon, the Society of Antiquaries’ fortnightly online newsletter, until 2020, and British Archaeology magazine for a wonderful 20 years, stepping back in 2023. I am now a full-time writer – a sentence I dreamed of penning, when I wrote with a pen, more than half a lifetime away, when I grew up on a farm knowing the world only as something I could see in newspapers.
I hugely enjoy working for TV and radio (I have written a drama and have presented a couple of archaeology-themed series on Radio 4), as I do public speaking. Among TV projects in which I have both appeared and for which I have been consultant are Murder at Stonehenge for Channel 4 and Stonehenge Live! for Channel 5.
In 2009 I was one of 2,400 people to take part in Antony Gormley’s One & Other in Trafalgar Square, London, when for one hour I was able to create a museum of 700,000 years (as it was then!) of British archaeology on the empty statue plinth (the “fourth plinth”).
I am a recipient jointly with Maev Kennedy of the British Archaeology Press Award. In Pursuit of Treasure (BBC Radio 4, 2010) was shortlisted for best current affairs in the International Broadcasting Awards, and along with The Voices Who Dug Up The Past (Radio 4) was highly commended for best media representation of archaeology in the British Archaeological Awards. Digging up Britain won the Archaeological Institute of America’s Felicia A Holton Book Award for a major work of public nonfiction in 2023.
I am President of the Sussex Archaeological Society, a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London, a former member of the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, a trustee of the Marlborough Mound Trust, and a director of Antiquity Publications Ltd. I am an exhibited photographer, and passionate about arts in general.

Between my finger and my thumb
The squat pen rests.
I’ll dig with it.
Digging, Seamus Heaney 1966




Mike,
I am interested in finding out what happened to the Foamhenge Stonehenge model made for the Channel 5 TV programme. I know it was on ebay. Was it sold, and if so are you able to tell me who to? I am interested in trying to set up a sound installation using loudspeakers to recreate the acoustic environment of Stonehenge, but this would be really effective actually set inside the foamhenge replica somewhere. Anyway, if you can help at all I would be very interested. You can see my research into the acoustics of Stonehenge at soundsofstonehenge.wordpress.com and other work at AMBPNetwork.wordpress.com . I have been discussing my work with some of the Sheffield Stonehenge Riverside Project people, Mike PP, Ben Chan, Jim Rylatt and the like. If you have a moment and can drop me an email that would be great.
I am a senior lecturer in music technology at Huddersfield University
LikeLike
I’m asked this every so often, and the best I can do is repeat what I recently said to a BBC TV drama producer. I so wish I could tell you where Foamhenge is and you could use it, but my understanding is that it was some time ago disposed of. It was carved from blocks of expanded polystyrene. It was on eBay, but despite a few claims made to the media, when it came down to it noone bought it (noone was ready to pay the transport cost). The haulage contractor who was temporarily storing it (in an outside railway cutting, I believe) eventually got rid of it. There do seem to be a few megaliths still around (I think the National Trust in Avebury may have one or two, and English Heritage had one at Stonehenge in 2008) but the bulk of it has gone. It was created by Crawley Creatures in a big shed in Bicester, for Darlow Smithson Productions. A lot of effort went into making it as true to life as we could achieve (bearing in mind we were imagining a complete monument and not a ruin, and that even now no detailed survey of the surviving stones exists), and it would have made a wonderful educational display inside some huge building. Sadly not to be.
LikeLike
Hi Mike, I just finished your book and greatly enjoyed its focus on the monument itself. I think, though, that this comment from a site about fur traders is important: “An explorer naturally wishes to travel as far as possible by water.” (wiki, Canadian Canoe routes) In a world without the wheel, paddling is so, so much easier than carrying of dragging. I see a canoe culture as a little like a car culture. If you can carry your goods by canoe, you do. And a fancy dugout would be like a Porsche. You could even decorate it for special occasions as the Haida may have done.
Rosemary Clark-Beattie
LikeLike
Good point. We’re in different worlds here, however, partly the culture and landscape, partly the things being moved. On the first, for European explorers in Canada, sea and rivers were routes into lands they didn’t know, and canoes were developed by native peoples for whom water was a key resource – under the ice in the far north, following salmon runs on the west coast and so on. In Neolithic Britain rivers are small and the key resource was land, for growing food. On the second, even the smallest Welsh stones are larger than a single canoe could think of carrying.
LikeLike
Hi! I want to know about the wereabouts of the “Mana”!? Is she still floating somewhwre?
I am a very interested hobbyhistorian!
Carl Blom, Sweden
LikeLike
That was a question I asked myself some years ago. The last Routledge owner entry in the Lloyds register of yachts was in 1919, and in 1920 the owner is listed as the Earl of Dundonald. In 1923 she goes to DC Klugman, and in the last Lloyds entry (1925) she is attributed to DC Klugman of Rua Theophalo, Ottoni, Rio de Janeiro. J van Tilburg (Among Stone Giants, page 204) says she was destroyed by fire under Klugman’s ownership on September 1 1923.
LikeLike
Wonderful to run across your blog this a.m., Mike. It’s been a number of years since reading Hengeworld – and your kind response when I emailed thanks c. 2003. Exciting news this morning about the boy with the amber necklace. Thanks again for your fine work. Helps keep rustics out in the provinces like ourselves informed.
parrish, florida
LikeLike
I was wondering if Silbury Hill might be in a place from where, at the top of the hill, a voice or trumpet like instrument could create echoes bouncing back from the surrounding hills. Also, is the path which winds up the side contemporary with it’s building, or do you think it had another way up.
LikeLike
Hello Mr.Pitts
I was watching the PBS program Nova “Stonehenge” that you were a part of, I was watching the gentleman who were trying to move the weight of a large stone with a bearing type rail, which they were have some problems, the hold time I said “its too complicated”, you even said the same thing, but I don’t think that they were not all wrong, especially the “jumping jack” shape stone balls, that’s when I remembered about a hobbyist (Wally Wallington) who’s hobby is to move large 10 ton concrete blocks and even 15 ton barn by him self.
Maybe the pointed balls where used like machinist’s jacks or points, being a Tool Maker, tradesmen use them too hold up odd or rough shape weldments/casting to be machined. Wally shows moving a stone on a flat surface, but these jumping jacks stone could have been used on a flatten notch timbers.
Anyway please take a look.
Vincent, Canada
W.Wallington has a website:
“The Forgotten Technology” http://www.theforgottentechnology.com/newpage1
You tube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCvx5gSnfW4&feature=related
LikeLike
Hello Mike. As another reader mentioned above, I too recently came across your site- with great excitement, I might add! I have read and re-read Hengeworld to the point where my copy needs to be laid to rest. In my opinion, humble though it is, of my library of Stonehenge-related books (and there are nearly 30 so far), yours is the ‘cleanest’, and most accurate (again, i.m.o) of the lot. It has become my reference for all the others.
I see Hengeworld quoted by others as well, none the least Dennis Price of the wonderful Eternal Idol site. http://www.eternalidol.com/
There is an actual point to all this! Have you perhaps heard any news concerning more detailed work at blue-henge ? In particular, have there been any casts made of the stoneholes, to compare to the dolerites standing just over 1.5k away ? There was much made that this was likely the site from whence the ‘extra’ bluestones were ‘stored’: it would be wonderful to have this confirmed.
with kind regards,
Bob Jenkins,
Charlottetown, PEI
Canada
LikeLike
Glad you liked Hengeworld Bob, though it’s getting out of date almost by the day now (I like to think that just about everything in the paperback edition stills stands, but there is much to add from new work; the only bit that needs to be completely rewritten is about the sequence of megaliths at Stonehenge, which I’ve written about elsewhere on this site).
No physical casts were made of the pits at “Bluehenge”, but a 3D laser scan was taken of the topography, which could I imagine be used to make a physical model.
LikeLike
Hi Mike, just watching the Stonehenge program on SBS tonight. Surely, if the natural runway linking the stonehenge monument with the river, as if froze and filled with ice, may have allowed a very large stone to be moved over it. Ice is slippery.
Makes sense, Possible. Thanks for your study,
Julia Starr, Australia
LikeLike
It sounds a plausible idea, Julia – at least many people seem to think so, and have written to me suggesting it (quite why now, I don’t know). In practice, however, I think ice is very unlikely to have played any significant role in stone moving, for several reasons.
The principal one is that it was never cold enough for the ground to be sufficiently frozen for this to work. There was a time when Salisbury Plain was tundra, and the ground permanently frozen. But the last permafrost in southern England melted well over 10,000 years ago, and the first time anyone moved stones to Stonehenge was only 5,000 years ago (as we now think; we used to say 4,000 or so years ago, but now most of us think the first stones arrived at the beginning of the site’s history, which is well dated – so we’re unlikely to say that stones arrived before then).
Essentially the weather when Stonehenge was built was not that different from today’s. There might have been the odd very cold winter, and standing water could have frozen to a depth of 10cm or more, but as today that would have been rare – and hardly something that could be planned into a complex organisational schedule that is likely to have run over several years, and been driven by politics and religion (when did they ever wait for weather?).
Even an exceptional ice cover would have done no more than make things worse for moving a stone. The big ones are massive, and would have smashed through the ice, pushing out the mud underneath, while people and animals trying to do the moving would have slithered on the mess. And this is when it’s very cold, the days are short and fresh food supplies are short.
You need to remember too that the stones had to be moved for much greater distances than the length of the Stonehenge Avenue, or the valley leading up from the river.
If there was a season for moving stones, it’s more likely to have been late summer or early autumn than winter. The days are still long, it’s comfortable to be outside, and wild foods are in good supply. The cereal harvests will all be in, and the labour demands of farming are at their lowest. This may also have made it easier to access the best routes, as there would no longer be crops on the ground that, other things being equal, would need to be avoided.
LikeLike
Hey Mike
I’m currently writing on an essay about “what different interpretations of Star Carr can tell us about the mesolithic as a discipline” and stumbled upon one of your very first articles. I enjoyed reading it but was surprised that this was the only time that you took part in the discussion.
Now that we know that Star Carr is not just the small area that Clark excavated, do you have any new thoughts about it?
Have you ever tried to actually do some more excavations in that area to find evidence for a larger settlement or tried to encourage someone to search for it?
Cheers
Nik
LikeLike
I’m horrified to see I wrote that paper (1) over 30 years ago! And you’re right, I haven’t contributed to the continuing debate, and neither have I excavated there. But I have followed it all with interest, and perhaps one day I might return to it, as I do think there are things to say. Not the least of which is to repeat the driving point behind my article, which is often missed.
Things are different now, but when I wrote about Star Carr, Grahame Clark was still active, and had recently published his own reassessment of his original dig (2). I was a student, and Star Carr and Clark were both new to me – and I thought both were wonderful! No one had apparently written about the site other than Clark himself, and I was warned that to do so was treading on hallowed ground. Yet there were fundamental flaws in his argument, so cleverly presented, that the site was a red deer hunters’ winter camp.
Most of the antler – the key seasonal indicator in Clark’s thesis – was industrial waste or hunting kit, so the deer could have been killed at any time. Stripping out such antler from calculations had a big effect on the relative amounts of meat supposedly contributed by different animals. This misrepresentation of the significance of red deer at the site was also noticed by Seamus Caulfield, and unknown to each other, we must have been writing about it at the same time (3).
The waterside location was (of course rightly) treated as the reason why so much organic material survived at Star Carr. But why the stuff should have been in the water in the first place was never questioned. This was what most puzzled me about Star Carr. It was hearing Henry Hodges (who was a lecturer at the London Institute then) talking about antler technology, and how antler is commonly soaked in water to soften it for working, that gave me a possible solution: it was an industrial site where water was needed. It made sense that hide working might also have benefited from the water, as well as antler (and who knows what else?). The hides could have been there just for cleaning, but I added the chemical treatment – perfectly plausible – because World Archaeology had a chemistry themed issue coming up, and I’d heard the editor was looking for articles.
In all the stuff since written about Star Carr, I have yet to see a sensible alternative explanation for why there should be so much industrial waste, gathered together in a relatively small area, in or close to the water.
References
1 “Hides and antlers: a new look at the gatherer-hunter site at Star Carr, North Yorkshire, England”, World Archaeology 11 (1979), 32-42
2 “Star Carr: a case study in bioarchaeology”, Addison-Wesley 1972
3 “Star Carr – an alternative view”, Irish Archaeological Research Forum 5 (1978)
LikeLike
Thank you for the quick reply!
I was already wondering how you made it into World Archaeology being that young AND going against Clark… Did you get any harsh comments about your article after it was published?
LikeLike
I was too shy (or wise) to ask Clark what he thought of it, so I never knew, but I can’t imagine he was impressed! I remember there being a lot of positive interest from outside the UK.
LikeLike
You can now find this paper on Academia.com (http://www.academia.edu/993422/Hides_and_antlers_a_new_look_at_the_gatherer-hunter_site_at_Star_Carr_North_Yorkshire_England). I note it says there the original paper was prepared in 1974, which makes 30 years ago seem quite recent…
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
I have been doing some research on the geometry of Stonehenge. I am trying to find the most accurate survey thet defines the the stones and holes that form the concentric circles. Along with the elements that are within the Sarsen Circle. I have found much on line. However I wanted to get the most accurate. I have come across the surveys done by English Heritage. Is it possible to get a copy of those surveys? I have just found your website and am enjoying the read. If you could help I would greatly appreciate it.
Peter
LikeLike
I had to do a bit of asking around about this (my thanks to Dave Field, amongst others). As I suspected, the best (possibly the only?) modern surveys of Stonehenge are owned by English Heritage, including a survey of the stones it commissioned from MJ Rees and Co in 1989.
The Historic Plans room archives at the National Monuments Record, Swindon (NMR), should be able to supply digital or paper copies for a basic fee: contact details here. A photogrammetric survey carried out in 1993 by Paul Bryan, English Heritage, and a recent scan carried out by Greenhatch Ltd should be available before too long.
As far as published plans go, the best source (as for so much of Stonehenge archaeology) is Cleal et al 1995 (Cleal R, Walker, K & Montague, R 1995. Stonehenge in its Landscape: Twentieth Century Excavations. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 10). This study was prepared by Wessex Archaeology, but they used existing surveys by English Heritage, and there are some very nice fold out plans.
LikeLike
Thanks Mike.
I will follow up on these leads.
LikeLike
Just a quick personal note to say Hi Mike! Just finished watching one of your great TV programmes here in Australia, and seeing you reminded us of your visit to Tonga all those years ago. Very best wishes, Diana, Steve and Pesi Brown from ‘Otea
LikeLike
Diana, lovely to hear from you, I hope you are all well. And I hope your memories of Tonga are all as good as mine!
LikeLike
Hello Mike, I would like to express my gratitude for your wonderful book, Hengeworld. My copy has a permanent place on my headboard! Although my Stonehenge book collection is substantial, there are only two I read and re-read, Hengeworld and Stonehenge in its Landscape.
Love the site, very well thought out, simple and clean interface, yet rich in content.
Cheers from Canada 🙂
LikeLike
Apologies Mike, in my haste to scribble down a few lines I did not bother to scroll back… seems I have posted in the recent past.
While I am here (again!), I would ask if you have any plans to ‘update’ Hengeworld ? WIth so many wonderful new discoveries, the work of the SRP, I imagine there is enough material to fill a new version, notwithstanding MPP’s new book.
Cheers
LikeLike
Five years later and still no updated Hengeworld! I will do it one day if I get the chance, there is so much more to say (it would be a new book more than an update), but I can’t see the point in writing a book about the archaeology of Stonehenge while so much new research is in progress, making your book out of date while it’s being printed. It’s all going to slow down before long.
LikeLike
G’day Mike,
It’s a long time since we went wandering around sites in the fields around Bognor together. You may recall that I was living in a house full of Australians back then. Well now I live in Australia, am retired,,and am catching up with the interests of my mis-spent youth.
After reading Francis Pryor’s books, and noting his several mentions of your work, I found a copy of Hengeworld in a secondhand bookshop a couple of days ago. I must say it’s very good and I’m glad to see your hard work back in the ’70s came good.
All the best
Mick Reed
LikeLike
Mike,
There is a drawing of a magnificent handaxe from the Boxgrove dig in your Fairweather Eden book. I wanted permission to use it in my forthcoming book – The Return: Human Nature and the Regeneration of Eden. The publisher apparently no longer exists. I found an artist named Julian Cross in google, but he isn’t the same artist that did the drawing. I can send you hardcopy of it if I have a P.O. box. Given your work, you may actually be interested in my book.
All the best,
John Burnett
Sept. 2, 8PM Pacific time
LikeLike
Julian Cross’s fabulous drawing of that handaxe (like his other artefact drawings in the book) was prepared for the Boxgrove Project, so I suggest you contact them. They have a website run by Matt Pope at http://boxgroveproject.wordpress.com, where you can find contact details (check Stone tools for an extraordinary photo of a table-full of axes). Much of the important work at Boxgrove has still to be published in academic detail.
LikeLike
Is it possible Stonehenge is the Round Table of Legend(it does look a bit like one), are the re excavated bone fragments of 50ish individuals from the blue stone holes of Stonehenge 1 the knights of the Round Table, with the two towers of merlins mound and silbury castle we need to re examine Arthurian legend in an earlier Neolithic age, I have some concerns about the level of security of these ancient relics, they could be a lot more valuable than thought, if the university were slack and they get stolen they are likely to be the most unpopular scientists ever. They should certainly be in a safe and with alert security. I will email the university my concerns, it maybe a tenuous thread but if I can follow others can and the hunt for excalibur should absolutely not be left to the bounty hunters
LikeLike
Hi Mike
I too watched the show “Stonehenge” and I would like to make a comment.
Currently I am building a BlueJay sailboat in Australia – upside down.
Bending over and turning my head to see the right side view I noticed
how much this boats bottom resembles an ice sled – water is just melted ice right ?
So I think I managed to somewhat get inside the head of the designer
(I didn’t see snow until I was in my early fifties)
And to understand ancient peoples we have to look at a problem
from their “workman like” view.
Not that I ever wanted to build a Stonehenge but if you asked
me to move those stones for you – and armed with my basic idea
of boatbuilding – I would first cut the FLAT keel and mount the stone on it,
using logs I would roll to the mudflats and begin building the boats sides
around it on the low tides.
– The length of the keel spreading the 2 tonne weight easily
I would never go to sea in it, instead I would have it tethered to the shore
with ropes and walk it around to the river (rowers would still be necessary)
Arriving at the site I could dismantle the boat and use the keel to
slide the stone – or other purpose – whatever
Remembering these people might have worked after the years harvest and
got the job done over a number of years.
No problems – if I had the time me. my wife and our two sons could get the job
done eventually but if we had some psyched up believers to help it
would be a no brainer !
The more I bother to think about the ancients the more obvious their work
becomes. Where there is a will there is a way.
By the way I know this henge pre-dates the druids but the term
“knowing the oak” (if that’s a real term) probably refers to the working of the oak
for a result like this and not some mysterious knowledge they possessed.
I won’t looses sleep over it any way 🙂
all the best,
Geoff Melling
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
I am writing a new book about Stonehenge and you have two photographs that I would very much like to use. The first is of Aubrey-7, opened during the 08 excavation, and the other is of you and Richard Atkinson crouched at the road’s-edge dig for Stonehole-97 in 1979.
How would I go about obtaining terms/permission for these images?
Best wishes,
Neil Wiseman
LikeLike
Dear Mike
I see you are speaking at the Theatre Royal Bath in a weeks or so’s time. Unfortunately we can’t manage to get there. Are you speaking anywhere else in the UK in the next few months please? Best Wishes Caroline
LikeLike
That’s the last event scheduled for this year, Caroline. If you click on the Richard III tab at the top of the page, you’ll find a list of what I’m doing. Next up after Bath is an interview to be broadcast on NPR across the US, which you will be able to listen to online; and I have a couple of talks lined up for next year. Thanks for asking. Mike
LikeLike
Mike,
I just wanted to post how very much I enjoyed your appearance on a video I only recently viewed, “Mysteries–The Stonehenge.” I am sure it is wuite old, but it was very interesting.
My dear wife and I just last week fulfilled a lifelong ambition and visited Stonehenge. It was fascinating, and viewing the TLC video in which you appeared made it even more interesting. Thank you!
Bernie Skoch
Arkansas
LikeLike
Thanks Bernie! I’m pleased you were able to see Stonehenge after the recent on-site changes, it is so much a better experience now than it was.
LikeLike
I have always been a fan of your documentaries on Stonehenge.
However, I am always amazed that the best brains in the world have yet to solved the issue of ‘how the stones were moved’.
I am currently having a novel being written based on a storyline I wrote 30+ years ago. The story is about the last ever bluestone becoming lost and, therefore, why the purpose of Stonehenge was/could never be realised.
How the stones where moved (not necessarily just the bluestones) I thought I’d share my thoughts on how this feat was easily accomplished.
I hope you will find the attached ‘instructions’ on interest and would welcome any comment you may wish to make on my idea
Stonehenge – a revolution in design
(Explanation from my book being written: ‘Unsung hero’s)
July 2015
We’ll never truly know the purpose of Stonehenge, who built it and why. Even more so is the question how the stones were transported from their source. Was it aliens? I doubt it.
Archaeologists and scientists, still argue to this day, how such a feat was possible – believing that they were dragged along on rollers over many miles. However popular this theory is, it remains a contentious and controversial subject to this day.
Man may have invented the wheel, but it took Stonehenge for it to evolve from!
If I was faced with such a monumental task, my idea would be simplistic in its execution. This is how, I believe, the Bluestones where moved:
List of requirements:
One large ‘Bluestone’ – a few tons is OK
2 x heavy duty, very long continuous hemp rope
Animal hides – enough to cover the stone
Long leather bindings – lots and lots.
Water – to soak the leather bindings
Logs – enough to wrap around the stone
a hot bed of ash
A strong workforce
Instructions:
1 – Select stone to be transported. Remove from ground and set to rest on two supports, one each end, leaving enough room to gain access underneath.
2 – Wrap stone with thick animal hide and tie with wet leather bindings. When the bindings dry, they will tighten the hide.
3 – Make a bed of hot ash. Later, this is to be placed underneath the stone to dry out the binding securing the wood to the stone.
4 – Place dry seasoned logs longitudinally to the upper surface part and fill in with smaller branches to make a semi circular cross section. Bind tightly with wet soaked leather or rope hemp. Allow to dry. Repeat several times until the bundle is solidly bound. This process may that a few days.
4 – Roll stone 180 degrees and repeat.
5 – Make two very long and strong ropes of hemp (or similar).
Rope is made of individual lengths (with loops at each end) linked together to make one continuous loop. Any part of the rope that shows signs of breaking or breaks, during use, can swiftly be replaced.
Along the rope, knots are tied. Sections are joined by passing each end through a loop and then locked using with a sturdy piece of wood – which is also used to help pull on the rope.
The loops at each end of the rope also allows a large stake to be placed through to provide extra leverage needed to pull it up hill.
6 – Wrap the rope around the stone once. This will cause the rope to self tighten when pulled.
To move:
1 – Pull on the continuous rope.
2 – Direction is controlled by pulling more on one rope than the other.
3 – To pull up hill: Insert long stakes through the joining loops of the rope. With the stake planted in the ground, pulling on the stake would draw the rope forward thus roll the stone.
4 – To stop – let go.
Although this idea has yet to be tried and tested, I see no logical reason why it would not.
LikeLike
Hello Mike
May I say first of all how much I enjoy your blog (and books).
I wonder if you have any thoughts on the authenticity (or otherwise) of the Grimes Graves Venus? I’ve recently written about it, in very amateurish style, on my blog, Icknield Indagations, The consensus seems to be that it’s a fake; I wonder if you have any insider knowledge of its story? And do you know if there are any scientific tests that might establish its status?
Best wishes
David Gouldstone
LikeLike
Hi Mike: I don’t know whether you remember me from Usk in 1971. Since I last saw you, I’ve worked for the Palestine Exploration Fund, and then for the Middle East Department of the British Museum, from which I retired earlier this year. Helen and I visited Leicester Cathedral and the Richard III Centre this afternoon, where I found your book. I see you’ve done even better! Congratulations! P.S.: The book is a great read!
LikeLike
Ah, the digging years! Hi Rupert, glad you liked the book. Things didn’t work out too badly for us, did they? Never a dull moment in archaeology!
LikeLike
Just want to say how much I enjoyed your Richard III book (updated paperback)! The excavation has been a great thrill for me – have been to the Visitors’ Centre and the cathedral – as I never imagined he would be found. I’m glad to see you call out the lack of professionalism of Langley and co., which was just plain embarrassing and undignified. I’ve heard Richard Buckley speak about the dig, and Bob Savage is an old friend.
LikeLike
Dear Mike, just looked you up after seeing the end of the PBS programme on moving the stones of Stonehenge. I’ve always wondered why nobody seems to consider the stones would be easier to move in a hard winter. Sledges on very hard ground, frost or light snow with sufficient animal or people effort would seems to be a better time to do it. It would be tpugher on the workforce but they are living in the conditions anyway. Would welcome your thoughts.
LikeLike
Hi Chris. This idea is suggested every so often, but the major obstacle is the sheer weight of the larger stones. I commented on this in some detail in response to a query from Julia Marr, above, a few years ago.
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
thanks for your reply. I did have a look at your reply to Julia and agree that iced rivers are not the answer. I’m not wedded to the idea but there are some things to consider as follows:
You don’t need a particularly hard winter to make ground so hard it’s virtually undiggable (for want of a better word). If you place something heavy on frost or snow it will turn to water and give you a natural lubricant between the hard ground and whatever supports the stone. As long as you can overcome static friction you can keep something moving with comparatively little force. It works under skis and cars and we’ve moved my 2.5 ton 4×4 with two people with the brakes on, so a blue stone seems possible.
Re day length – if you can move something twice as far in half the time day length wouldn’t be an issue. Late summer or autumn would need folks to be gathering the natural harvest and take you late in to the year. And I presume they would be getting the ground ready before winter. Winter (Dec- March) would, presumably, be a time of little other activity so you might as well drag stones across the country! Also, once the harvest is in you have a ready food supply and could cache along the route.
As I say, not wedded to the idea but there are a number of things going for a winter move. And, our ancestors would have discovered slippery surfaces long before they discovered the sledge or the wheel. I think it’s too easy to decide it’s the wrong time of year when all the reconstructions are done in the summer sunshine. The only thing I’m saying is, if you wanted to move the stones in the winter could you do it and would it be easier.
Chris.
LikeLike
Stonehenge a revolution in design
Hi Mike,
We’ll never truly know the purpose of Stonehenge, who built it and why. Even more so is the question how the stones were transported from their source.
Archaeologists and scientists, still argue to this day, how such a feat was possible believing that they were dragged along on rollers over many miles. However popular this theory is, it remains a contentious and controversial subject to this day.
Man may have invented the wheel, but it took Stonehenge for it to evolve from!
If I was faced with such a monumental task of moving large stones, my idea would be simplistic in its execution.
This is how, I believe, the bluestones (and possibly the larger ones too) where moved:
The shape of the stone would be changed to resemble a gigantic roller using packing of timber, and animal hide.
If you would like more info on the breakdown or instructions on how they were prepared and method of transportation, please get in touch and I’ll be happy to forward it to you.
Although this idea has yet to be tried and tested, I see no logical reason why it would not.
Mechanically, this method would prove to be more practical and be far more efficient than using wooden rollers to move the same weight over any variety of ground condition.
For larger stones – ones that weight 10’s of tonnes – a mat of logs woven together could be used to wrap the stone turning its irregular slab shape to a cylindrical one that would resemble a huge garden roller.
I look forward to you thoughts on this.
Regards
JJ
LikeLike
Mike, i have organised a batch of research notes to be sent to Neil Guiden at English Monuments regarding the Great Year Circle feature. Do try to get a copy. Start at the back in the last half of Holy Grail. All conclusions up to others. If you see Ros tell her Neil has a copy for her put aside. Thank you.
LikeLike
Transporting the bluestones by sea. The Egyptians transported their obelisks by submerging them in the water and then attaching them to the boat. Stone in water weighs a third of its weight in air. The prehistoric boat at Hull museum is clearly made for sail and a bluestone slung underneath would make a great counterweight. I can’t visualise people paddling a raft with a huge stone stowed on it.
LikeLike
Hello, I watched the documentary curiosity stonehedge. I couldn’t help but think if them blue stones did come by boat (which I believe to be correct) Another way you could prove this theory although my be rather expensive, If there was 80 blue stones transported to the destination then how many boats most of sank ?. As i dont believe they would of had a 100% success rate, I would of thought they would of had some sink with in the first 5 miles for instance, as once the stones in that’s when you would know if your boat was good enough, some must not of made it, even at 20% that’s still 16 blue stones that could be in the sea, if some sort of sonar ground mapping could be done the boats that did sank would be long gone by now, but them stones maybe still there just under lots of sediment so if their all in the sea in theory it’s extra if not near 99% confirmation,
LikeLike
Hi, I think you are absolutely correct in making that assumption. When they built the Severn bridge I did hear a stone was found and was later transported to Bristol. I also agree with you that the stones where not moved on sledges and ball bearings. My theory is that they were wrapped with matetial to turn the stone to take a cylindrical shape. It was then ‘rolled’ using rope. I am happy to outline my idea in greater depth should you wish to get in touch.
LikeLike
Fully understand the reasoning of the above, and it’s logic. My theory of the later part of the journey of the Stones from the river Avon to Stonehenge is quite simple,, The Stone Age builders waited for Winter !! and when all the “pockets” in the road way froze over ,,they simply SLID the stones over/along the road way . A number (not all) of the stones had accumulated during the summer months at the river bank , waiting for the Winter ,,this process may have taken place over a number of years, I do not accept the theory that the stones were moved on a sledge, using stone ball bearings,, Regards John Denis Fay (facebook) Retired now living in Ireland
LikeLike
Hi John. Interesting theory but one I do not remotely accept due, in main, that the climate can be disappointingly unreliable. If no snow showed each winter, the back log would stifle progress. Also, pressure would be placed to ensure the structure was completed by a certain celestial event. I can go into greater detail should you wish to contact me.
LikeLike
Hello Mike,
Just wondering if you ever found out what happened to the Peakirk Cross?
Hannah
LikeLike
That’s a good question Hannah. When i get a moment I’ll see what I can find out and post back
LikeLike
Michael, please ask EH’s Neil Guiden to see if he has any spare copies of the research ‘The Ark of Noah, The Holy Grail’ on the A303/360 route. If you don’t want to believe the information…fine but it is food for thought regarding the chance to save the most precious section of all regarding totally uniqiue & irreplaceable World Heritahe archaeology that could be destroyed by heavy plant in just 5 minutes. Thank you
LikeLike
Mike, what about the three pits Parker-Pearson excavated for Nat’l Geographic, that had 3 stones together in each, OBVIOUSLY phallic –a lingam with two round smaller stones beside it, anatomically correct position. Mike’s wife showed me the pics at an SAA meeting a few years ago, told me that the Geographic forbad him to publish or publicize the phallic pits (no sex please we’re english).
I got your blog link while searching for something else, am very happy to find it. You might also comment on Gordon Freeman’s discovery of equinox niche in the side of one of the standing stones, such that at equinox a ray of sunlight comes through the niche to the Heelstone. Freeman is an excellent scientist (physics/chemistry) and careful observer, in Edmonton, Alberta; Parker-Pearson et al. won’t do him the courtesy of going over to look at the niche he predicted and found. His e-mail is: k.np@ualberta.ca [kinetics is his special research area]
I’m an American archaeologist who does history/philosophy/sociology of science of archaeology, as well as anthropology of No. Am. First Nations, you can Google my books on Amazon, see the controversial ones. Thanks!
LikeLike
Hi Alice, good to hear from you. I’ve enjoyed reading your work over the years. I can’t comment on Mike PP’s phallic stones, which I don’t know about. The final reports on the Riverside Project’s excavations are due over the next year, so we’ll see what they say. They are going to be very interesting, and I’ve no doubt MPP et al will write whatever they feel like!
I first discovered alignments at Stonehenge in Gerald Hawkins’ book, which i remember reading with excitement at school. But I still think the only one we can be reasonably sure about is the solstice line. It’s not just at Stonehenge but at other monument in the landscape around, and it’s caught by several different features at Stonehenge itself (including some that are not alignments, such as the distinctive way the great trilithon stones are carved and finished). As for the others, all depend on a few points (often two) and have nothing to differentiate them from hundreds of other possibilities offered by so many pits and stones. That’s not to say of course there weren’t other alignments that meant something to people, but I don’t think we can demonstrate any. That doesn’t worry me. I don’t think our inability to say whether or not alignments other than the solstice one can be proven or not, has a serious impact on how we might think about and understand Stonehenge, which remains endlessly fascinating!
all best, Mike
LikeLike
Hi Mike.
I have a question about the Sanctuary and the troublesome post holes of rings D and E. I have just read Stuart Piggots “Timber Circles: A Re-examination” in which he put forward the idea (which has now fallen out of favour) that the Sanctuary was a multi-phased roofed structure. In it he states that the only non double holes in the D and E rings where D5, E6 and E8, and accompanies this with a ground plan showing all the holes of the E ring as been double except for the aforementioned E6 and E8. However this plan differs from the plan drawn by Maud Cunnington in her report of the excavation as she only shows E3 and E4 as being possible double post holes. As Maud Cunningtons plan is the definitive plan of the excavation is Piggots plan wrong and if so where did he get the idea that most of the E ring posts were double?
As the only other person to have excavated the Sanctuary I wondered if you could shed any light on the possible double post configuration idea. Having read your report of the excavation I know that E4 showed signs of recutting, removal and replacement of posts and was difficult to interpret but wondered if there was a similar situation in E3 and E5 which were also excavated.
Regards
Rob
LikeLike
Hi Rob
The quick answer to this is that much as we’d like it to be otherwise, we are never going to know exactly what structures were raised at the Sanctuary or when.
The three pits Piggott refers to in those two rings as single rather than double postholes are the only circular ones in Cunnington’s plan: while she draws only two pits in ring E with an inner step, all but two of them are more or less oval rather than circular. We can imagine that Piggott assumed all the oval pits were double pits, regardless of Cunnington’s identification of a step – and Piggott would have been aware that her excavation of the site was not conducive to subtle recording.
This interpretation was to a certain extent confirmed in our 199 excavation when we re-excavated E3, E4 and E5. We found these pits, even without most of their original fill which had been removed by Cunnington (but significantly not all), revealed themselves to be more complex than the 1930 excavation had suggested. My report shows you what we found. A good test of Piggott’s theory would be to re-excavate D5. As my report explains, I had planned to do that. We found the site more complex than we had anticipated, with far more finds, and given we would have to rush it I decided to leave D5 for future excavation, not least because what we found suggested my original hypothesis – that this was also an oval pit – was strengthened. If this is right, this is a particularly rare and precious part of the site.
Mike
LikeLike
Dr Pitts,
Watched your investigation into the “Avebury Barber-Surgeon” on YT recently.
I think you have missed the obvious.
This man was thrown into a pit dug for one of the stones.
Implication: he was considered to be of pagan origin in some way, as were the stones – hence their burial.
Such burials outside the churchyard were ordained, according to your informant, for inter alia, “Manifest Usurers” – ie jews.
He was buried with the implements of a jewish tailor, ie scissors and bodkin.
The cut on his head was probably the result of persecution which has been the lot of the Wandering Jew for millennia.
LikeLike
Perhaps, but I’m not sure why scissors should be Jewish and why a Jew would be associated with anything pagan?
LikeLike
Dr Pitts
Good book, ‘Digging up Britain’
In Chapter 8, Cannibals, did you consider the relevance of the discussions in Herodotus? In 3.38 the Callatiae eat their dead parents and find the Greek practice of burning them disgusting, and in 4.26 the Issedones eat their dead parents, cleaning and gilding their skulls as ornaments
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
I recently visited the Sanctuary and noticed that there are 43 concrete marker blocks in the A ring instead of 42 as per the excavation plan with the additional concrete block placed between A8 and A9 (in a due north position). As the only large concrete block missing at the site is X1 I am wondering/assuming if this is the block that has been moved, probably as a prank as I can’t think of any other reason to reposition it. I believe it may have been in this position for several decades, my reasoning of this is that I have been visiting the site for nearly 30 years and I have always wondered why there was no block marking X1, also I can’t believe it’s taken me all this time to notice. Just wondered if this had gone unnoticed by EH and archaeologists or if it was known about but no one has got round to putting it back in place.
I also noticed that the site is slowly losing many of the smaller markers in the B and F rings, something which has been going on for some years now as more seem to disappear every time I visit. In the B ring there are only 27 of the 32 small marker posts and of the 27 present 6 have been pushed into the ground so that the painted top is at ground level and only noticeably when you are close to them. The F ring is suffering the most as it is missing 5 of its 8 markers. As the smallest markers at the site it is not surprising that these have been damaged or removed more than the other rings.
Any insights you may have on this would be gratefully received.
P.S. I did message you on your Instagram but then noticed that your last post was 2016 so have assumed you’re no longer engaged with this platform.
LikeLike
Hi Robert. I don’t know the answer to this (it’s been some time since I’ve been to the site). If you look at my excavation report from 2001 (https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/135939#page/11/mode/1up) you can see a plot of concrete markers done then by Dave Field, and also a plan (fig 7) where I showed the somewhat distanced relationship between markers and excavated Neolithic pits (one of them had been broken by machine mowing, cemented back together twice, and replaced quite a way off)
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
Many thanks for the prompt reply. I have just realised that the errant marker is actually between A7 and A8 (close to the east side of A7), and not between A8 and A9 as I previously mentioned. This is verified by Davids plan meaning it looks like it has been in this position since at least 1999 so would appear to have gone unnoticed for a long time. However Davids site plan has actually raised more questions for me because it shows features that I have not seen before on other plans of the site.
There are 5 features in question and all are marked as post holes on the plan:
1. A pair sit either side of the A ring to the north opposite A9
2. Another pair sit outside the eastern side of the site above X2 (one of which appears to be in the same position, or very close to the missing X1).
3. One sits just inside the A ring in the SE sector next to A21.
The two pairs I mention in point 1 & 2 above both seem to be the same distance apart (lines drawn between them would form a rectangle), plus the post in point 3 seems to be inline with the pair in point 2. I’m assuming that the survey was above ground only and if so do you know how David determined that these were post holes. As there are no markers in these positions and nothing is shown on the 1930 excavation plan I was wondering if these might have been triangulation points for the survey or something similar to do with the 1999 excavation? If not do you know why they are on the plan?
Sorry for more questions.
LikeLike
That is a plan of concrete markers as they were at the time
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
One last thought, is it possible a large concrete marker was used to mark post hole 7a?
Thanks for your input
LikeLike
Good Afternoon! I came across your article on Apollo about the sculptures of Rapa Nui, I am actually working on an object disapora report and noticed you mentioned that there may be as many as 20 of the smaller Maea statues in collections around the world. Do you have a list of these collections by chance?
Thank you!
LikeLike
I haven’t published a definitive list, which includes unconfirmed and suspected items (hence my being vague about the total, and there will I’m sure be pieces I don’t know about). One example emerged in 2016 in the collections of the Welsh National Museum in Cardiff, collected by a British Navy captain in 1909 (see British Archaeology 150, 2016). Wikipedia has a list of large pieces here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relocation_of_moai
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
I’m not an archaeologist but rather an enthusiastic amateur. I have read Fairweather Eden – which, when I’d finished it, made me wish I’d studied archaeology! I haven’t read your ‘Henge World’ book, yet, but I will!
I’m actually a retired British geologist living in Chile. I was listening to a radio program here on the thinking behind why the Inca’s built Santiago’s Plaza (the main square) where they did. It now seems likely that they chose the spot where the shadow of the summit cast by the nearest most prominent pyramid-shaped hill fell on the ground at the summer solstice.
This got me thinking about why Stonehenge is where it is. After typing a Google search I arrived at several of your articles/interviews and your blog. But, what really piqued my interest, was your recent (2018) theory about the Heel Stone and its celestial alignment with Stone 16 being potentially the most important thing. And that both stones were likely insitu so to speak (although not senso stricto) – where nature had left them, before the monument-builders showed up.
And then I went down a few rabbit holes and read other’s opinions – specifically Brian John’s blogs on the geomorphology around Stonehenge – and how solution hollows in chalk bedrock can preferentially form around recumbent sarsen slabs, leaving the stones effectively sitting (rather precariously, I image) on ‘pedestals’ of chalk or at the edges of quite steep-sided sink holes. And I started to imagine how this would then precipitate a potential physical scenario, whereby a sarson slab gradually or even catastrophically tips or slides into any void being naturally created around it. And that this could potentially provide a mechanism where the Heel Stone (and Stone 16) at Stonehenge, end up, after a few thousand years with the natural filling in of holes and levelling of the land surface, quite literally, sticking out of the ground. This then would have been the vista the first inhabitants were to see. The photos I have seen of the shadow cast on the ground by the Heel Stone at the summer solstice is very impressive – pyramidal shaded and very striking. If that is what first caught the attention of the early inhabitants in the Stonehenge area, and, led them to construct the monument around the point where the shadow of the point of Heel Stone hits the ground, then, by extension, the Heel Stone must have already been naturally in an upright position before they arrived and started to move other stone around, you would have thought?
You note in your most recent work that there are abnormally large ‘pits’ next to the Heel Stone and Stone 16. Do you think these pits are naturally formed? And if so, do they reach down into the chalk bedrock and is there any evidence for the solution hollows that might have caused the slabs to slide under gravity and be tilted naturally upright? The answer to this question is probably in your Hedge World book!
As a geologist, I’ve seen large boulders sticking out of the ground at all angles – all of which can be accomplished through known geological/geomorphological) processes… and, naturally, lots of time.
If it was only the happenchance of a solstice alignment of two stones lying flat on the ground, then, with all the sarsen slabs lying about in the area, it would be easy to line up any two on the celestial orientation of importance. It wouldn’t have had to be the Heel Stone and Stone 16. There must have been an additional factor surely! Was it that these stones appeared ‘unnaturally’ positioned….as if by the hand of the God’s? – sorry, getting poetic there!
Anyway, thank you for taking your time to read this. I love the combination of Archaeology and Geology. I was taught Mineralogy/ Microscopy by Rob Ixer and he was my thesis adviser at Uni. So, I love following his work especially.
Saludos Darren Jones
LikeLike
Dear Mike – do you do private tours for a day out in the chalk landscape talking all things neolithic?
LikeLike
Sorry, not at the moment
LikeLike
Thanks for the speedy reply Mike – that’s a pity, our group has lived for decades in west Berks/north Hants and are reasonably knowledgeable so are looking for an informed deeper dive – if things change please get back in touch – we are looking at next year sometime with luck. BW Peter.
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
I found your Victor Ambrus obituary in The Guardian. In the text you write: “In 1956 he was a student at the Hungarian Academy of Fine Arts in Budapest when Soviet forces entered the city to suppress the revolution. As a member of the National Guard, Ambrus was entrusted with securing the principal’s office but, as he told it, fell deeply asleep in the padded leather seats Woken by hammering, he pulled aside curtains to find himself staring into the barrel of a Russian tank He was taken down into the building’s basement, where his captors, working from a list of names, shot four of his friends and four soldiers. He escaped, left his family and walked overnight through heavy snow to the safety of Austria.”
When “as he told it“?
I’m looking for interviews with Victor Ambrus about his experience during the Hungarian revolution of 1956, but no one knows anything or even answers me. Could you help me or tell me who I can ask?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Giuseppe Lian
LikeLike
I talked to him in 2016, which is where some of my obituary observations came from, and especially in a feature I wrote for British Archaeology magazine Jul/Aug 2016 https://reader.exacteditions.com/issues/51385/spread/17 :
His father, an industrial chemist, encouraged him to become an artist. In 1953 he went to the Hungarian Academy of Fine Arts in Budapest, to learn graphic design, etching and engraving. He never finished his fourth year. When Russian tanks entered the capital city, he was asked to guard the principal’s office.
“It had lovely padded leather seats,” he told me, “and I fell deeply asleep. There was hammering on the door, and when I pulled the curtains aside, literally, I looked down at the cannon barrel of a tank, which seemed to be cranked straight at my head.” There was “some skirmishing”. Russian soldiers had a list of of those who had been defending the building, and rounded up a gang in the basement. Four of his friends and four Hungarian soldiers were executed. He escaped, leaving his family and walking overnight through snow to the safety of Austria. When the opportunity came, he was asked where he wanted to go? “Without hesitation”, he told me, “I said, to England, because I’ve got all these illustrations in my mind. This is what I want to do, and carry on working.”
There’s another interview here: http://www.playingbythebook.net/2015/11/19/all-about-the-fine-quality-black-line-an-interview-with-victor-ambrus/
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, of the two links you gave me, one is paid and the other is a strange website that does not correspond to any interview with Victor Ambrus….
Giuseppe
LikeLike
Yes, that link seems to have gone. Here’s the text I copied:
All about the fine quality black line: An interview with Victor Ambrus by Zoe |19/11/15
Victor Ambrus has won the Kate Greenaway medal twice (for ‘The Three Poor Tailors’ [1965] and ‘Horses in Battle'[1975]) and has illustrated more than 300 books. His historical illustrations showing archaeological interpretations were featured on Channel 4’s Time Team for 20 years. Indeed, his passion for illustrating history has been central to his career, both in children’s book illustration and also in adult non-fiction. Ambrus’ animal illustrations are also especially highly regarded and have formed another constant strand in his work, from his illustrations for K.M. Peyton’s Flambards series right up to his two newest books with the grimy humour of the rats and the soft, sweet eyes of the seal.
And thus the time came for me to interview Victor over the phone. Victor was born in Hungary in 1935 and I started by asking what sort of reading life he had had as a child, what books he had loved. I was all ready to look up lots of Hungarian authors (and quite keen to do so, as I studied Hungarian literature at University) but “no, there were numerous books, but they were all English books – in translation of course. I was bought up on things like Winnie the Pooh!” Many were given to him as presents and one of his favourite books was Ursula Moray Williams’ ‘Adventures of the Little Wooden Horse’. It was, however, the books of Arthur Rackham that in many ways changed his life forever. “He was a huge influence on me… and he meant that I’ve been drawing ever since I could hold a pencil!”
Victor’s immediately family weren’t especially artistic (though he grew up with tales of a particularly talented uncle who had died young during the influenza epidemic following the First World War), but they were immensely supportive of Victor’s growing interest in drawing. Victor’s father, an industrial chemist, was especially encouraging: “He was convinced I was going to be an artist when I grew up.”
Victor’s passion for historical illustration was laid down as a child: “I just drew and drew and drew and enjoyed it. I illustrated anything that I read – books on history, poems… in fact I did a vast number of drawings of the fights we Hungarians had with the Turks in the 17th century.”
“But then there came a point where I had to enter grammar school. But I still kept drawing and drawing and eventually I got to a point where I could apply for the Academy of Fine Art, a very fine, traditional school offering a classical training in drawing, including anatomy and all sorts of things you don’t often get these days. But illustration per se didn’t come into my training actually. It was all terribly straight-laced. Illustration was just something I did for myself.”
Victor’s education and training at the Academy of Fine Art was cut short in awful circumstances. In 1956 the Soviet Union invaded Hungary and life in Budapest became very hard. There came a point where Victor had to make what he himself describes as “a kind of life or death decision”; to leave Hungary and seek refuge abroad.
“It was very demanding physical conditions. There was heavy snow you had to walk through all night to get across the border. It was a kind of life or death decision. I had to leave family behind. I actually had no choice. They had a list of people who were attempting to hold the Academy building against the Russian tanks. I was one of these people… but I did a very bad job at it. It was terribly frightening. Eventually they cornered us in the basement of the building and they executed eight of us on the spot – four students and four regular [Hungarian] army soldiers. I was lucky to survive it.”
Victor eventually made his way to the Austrian border and from there he chose to make England his new home, with the much-loved books and illustrations from his childhood very much in mind. He ended up in Farnham and from there applied to the Royal College of Art. Education there was quite different to that Victor had experienced in Budapest’s Academy of Fine Art: “The Royal College was very much more liberal. It was a kind of a loosening up process.”
Victor’s early work included a lot of lithographs and etchings. “Etchings have played a big influence in my life because they produce fine quality lines and nice deep tones which appeal to me, even though I haven’t made any for quite some time because of you need quite sophisticated machinery, making it hard to do at home. Still, I was almost addicted to using very fine lines and my early illustrations are very like etchings except that they were not actually printed etched into glass plates – rather, I just used a very fine nib.”
I’m very curious about this passion for etching and how that tallies with Victor’s style now which to me seems much more fluid, looser and more vibrant than is typically achieved with the precise lines in etching. Was this something Victor himself recognised? “Yes, I turned away from this approach, probably because of the subjects I was getting – I was getting a lot of free flowing, fast action historical illustrations, where people might be riding a horse or fighting, and to start using very fine etching lines was not practical. It took a long time and gave the wrong effect. It became very laboured.”
“And then at this time when I was getting going, colour illustration came in in a big way and so I got into colour and my approach changed somewhat. I’d draw things up very quickly in pencil making sure everything moved the way I wanted it to and then I’d apply colour and more sweeping lines. But thinking about colour… funnily enough I think black is a very important thing in my drawings. I like to have the impact of black in an illustration – once I have heavy black lines I can use more intense colours. In a way the black boosts the colours I use, it makes the colour really work.”
Victor uses ink and also water soluble pencils for his black lines and part of the secret to the way he uses them is that “the most intensive black goes down when the illustration is done – then I can see exactly where it is needed, where it needs a punch.”
But taking a step back, to explore a little further this change in approach, this development in Victor’s illustrative style. It was whilst at the Royal College that Victor had a stroke of luck which led to his breakthrough as a book illustrator. He was commissioned by Blackie and Sons to illustrate a book with a lot of horses – a love of Victor’s since his youth spent working on the great Hungarian plains where he would often witness large groups of semi-wild horses in their natural habitat. That books was White Horses and Black Bulls by Alan C Jenkins and on the back of a review in the Times Literary Supplement which included two of Victor’s illustrations (“It caused quite a stir!”) suddenly a stream of horse-related illustration commissions started flowing Victor’s way.
“Luckily I love drawing horses… why? because they are so complicated… so impressive!”
At that point, Victor couldn’t himself ride but as he received more and more historical illustration commissions he realised this would have to change if he wanted his pictures to be authentic; it was very important to him to accurately capture how people sit when they are riding.
This commitment to detail, this concern for accuracy is another mainstay in all of Victor’s work: “I really enjoy the research. It’s important as otherwise the illustrations don’t feel convincing. It’s got to be right!”
On occasion, however, this drive for authenticity has led him into a spot of bother: “Well I didn’t know how they used a sword on horseback. Now I happened to have a sword and so I took it out and practised with it. I rode in the local forest where there were a lot of pine trees and I would take aim at a branch, swipe at it and see what was the best way of cutting it. Oh I enjoyed it! But then I had to stop because one day a swipe revealed a white-faced mushroom picker who was scared out of his skin. I hadn’t realised he was there and at that point I thought I’d better not do this any more and so I put the sword away.”
Another area of great interest for Victor when it comes to illustration, especially historical illustration, is costume and clothing. Whilst he studied at the Royal College he spent many hours just down the road in the Victoria and Albert Museum. “I’d sooner illustrate any period but the modern because the clothes are boring – there’s no colour – whereas the 17th, 18th century… ah, they are fabulous!” I’m very sorry when later in our conversation I find out that Victor’s own wardrobe at home isn’t full of the colourful and rich outfits he loves to draw.
As well as historical illustrations, Victor has always enjoyed drawing animals. And not just horses. “I’ve spent a lot of time in zoos. One of my favourite drawings I did in London Zoo, of a fantastic male gorilla. He sat there and stared at me for a long time and when I finished the drawing and walked away he came up to the fence, right up to the edge. And other people nearby said, ‘Show him, show him your picture of him,’ and so I turned around and showed the picture to him and it was quite amazing. He took it all in, with his eyes wide open. I don’t know what he thought of it but he was definitely puzzled.”
Animals have not always been so appreciative of being drawn by Victor though. “Once I was drawing a lovely big parrot who was on the end of a long post, at the far end, and I was drawing him and enjoying myself until he started to move up the post step by step. He came right up close to me and then it was absolutely amazing – he looked at me and reached forward and took the pencil from my hand, snapped it into two and chucked it behind him and walked off! I thought it was a devastating piece of criticism of my efforts! I was utterly speechless!”
Being observed whilst drawing is something which has played an important role throughout Victor’s career. For many people, he will be most famous as the illustrator for Channel 4’s Time Team (one of my own favourite programmes as a child), where archaeologists had three days to excavate a site, and Victor would draw interpretations of the site and archaeological finds, being watched whilst he did so not only by members of the public visiting the excavations but also by millions on TV.
And it’s actually all thanks to The Reader’s Digest that Victor became part of the brilliant Time Team crew. One day in a Bristol library, the director of Time Team came across Victor’s illustrations in a history of Britain published by The Reader’s Digest. A phone call later and the two of them met. “‘Can you draw quickly?’ ‘Ah.. yes, I can try’ ‘Well, draw a portrait of me then,’ and so I drew a quick-as-lightning pencil drawing of him and he was suitably impressed and the following week I was invited to go to Oxfordshire…” and the rest, as they say, is history, with the programme running for 20 years.
“It was a wonderful opportunity to see places you’d never get to … all sorts of weird places and drawing all different things. Of course it was sometimes a bit of an ordeal because your hands get so cold drawing outside, but the hand-drawn illustrations brought something special – by being hand-drawn, the image is more alive, it is saying this how it could have been, whereas a computer printout will say this is how it was and there is no argument.”
Did Victor ever get to have a go at digging? “It appealed to me – oh yes – but they never let me near the ground. I used to try to persuade Phil Harding [one of the Time Team Archaeologists] to let me have a dig but he would snarl at me and tell me to keep my hands out of the ground and keep on with my drawing!”
And keeping on with his drawing is what Victor has been doing and continues to do, even as he enters his ninth decade. Recent commissions include creating illustrations for the museum at Athlone Castle in the Republic of Ireland, an opportunity to return to his beloved 17th century, horses and interesting clothes, but also a chance to steep himself in the landscape and people of Ireland – a boon when it came to illustrating his most recently published book for children, The Seal’s Fate. And right now he is steeped in the history of Somerset whilst he finishes off a big project for the Taunton Castle Museum, covering Somerset from its prehistory “up to Butlins!”
But being busy drawing makes Victor happy. “I couldn’t imagine it otherwise. I’d miss it if I wasn’t drawing. I’m just obsessed with drawing. Even when I’m not drawing I might be thinking about drawing.” And with 300 books and a lifetime of illustrating under his belt, what advice would he have for children who were interested in illustrating?
“Draw and draw and draw. And it’s important not just to do the drawing you have to do, but to draw for yourself, just to please yourself.”
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
Thank you so much!
It’s a pity that there are no more details about his participation in the Hungarian uprising of 1956.
Thanks again!
All the best.
Giuseppe
LikeLike
Reading your Easter island book. So how exactly did the statues physically get from quarry to final resting spot??
LikeLike
Glad to hear you’ve found the book! I do set out some ideas about statue transport there. I don’t think for a moment that they were moved standing up, for reasons I explain (the idea that the theory is supported by a tradition that says they “walked” – omitting that the story says they did it by themselves – is somewhat undermined as factual by another tradition that says a woman magicked them). They can only have been moved horizontally, which would mean on their backs. They’d have to have been on some kind of sledge, much as canoes were launched. Imagine that and you picture gangs of men lined up either side, for a single hulled canoe lifting it by its outriggers. Perhaps a statue sledge had “outriggers”, poles at the sides that gave men a grip and allowed them to lift a little as forward direction was given by men on ropes. This would of course need timbers, but not excessive amounts (no rollers – they are a hindrance – and sledges could be reused), but as I say in the book it seems likely that a cause of the decline in statues being moved out to the coastal plinths (and hence a cessation in fallen ones being replaced) would be the gradual disappearance of suitable trees. When the first Europeans arrived, there were few such trees – and statue transport seems to have ceased.
LikeLike
Have you any feel for how widely Griset’s illustrtaions for Lubbock were known at the time please?
Best wishes
Greg Michaelson
PS I wasn’t allowed to ask this this as a comment on your article about Griset in London.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know any more on this than I said in the post (https://mikepitts.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/ernest-griset-in-london/#more-2691), though I see (with horror!) I wrote it 13 years ago, so there may well have been research done since by others. But on the face of it, it seems likely that Lubbock’s illustrations at the time were little known outside his family and visitors to his home (the latter of course covering quite a group)
LikeLike
Thanks Mike. I’m chasing down the roots of what I think may be the first Punch prehistoric cartoon and was struck by similarities with Griset’s mammoth hunt. But it looks like it’s the wrong rabbit hole… There’s also a Boitard L’Homme Fossile similarity.
LikeLike
Worthington G Smith, amateur archaeologist, illustrator and all round eccentric did a lot of interesting work, might be worth checking him out. I ran a feature about him by Peter Hoare and Mark White in British Archaeology in 2017
https://reader.exacteditions.com/issues/57390/spread/51
LikeLike