Plugin Support
qtwrk
(@qtwrk)
Hi,
https://www.docteur-fitness.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/alimentation-diabete-320×240.jpg.webp
because some of them doesn’t have wbep replacement , so it will fallback to .jpg
Best regards,
@qtwrk
thank you for your response.
How do I get these images to have a webp version?
Isn’t it the plugin that does it automatically?
For the other images it is done by itself.
Can we do it manually if not?
In my FTP, I have
alimentation-diabete-320×180.jpg.tmp
what does it mean ?? ^^
@espacemusculation if taking one of the example images such as https://www.docteur-fitness.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/etude-vetement-compression-musculation-1160×653.jpg
This converted to webp will in fact be larger than the jpg version of it. To be smaller as a webp image, the quality would have to be set to roughly 68 (out of 100) to be smaller.
The “Économies potentielles” that Pagespeed Insights list are purely estimations (a simple math formula), it’s not what they’re actually able to get it to.
Using a quality of 68 would simply make the image look really bad.
Thank you for your explanations 🙂
@lucasrolff
what is the extension . tmp ?
I just saw that all the images have this extension instead of .webp.
can I replace manually via FTP .jpg version to .webp version ?
97,5 for jpg
and 97,1 for webp with https://convertio.co/
The only thing I can see in the code, would be when it fetches the images from the image optimization servers, if the checksum for comparing the image (if it’s intact) would be a “mismatch”, then it seems the .tmp files can be left over.
That would however, give a message of “Pulled image md5 dismatched” in the admin panel from what I can see.
@lucasrolff
what do you think about Lossless ?
516 vs 56 ko !!
@lucasrolff
what do you think about Lossless ?
516 vs 56 ko !!
