The attempt at tyrannical totalitarianism is underway and on this in complete agreement.
Below I will explain a bit about why I think the depopulation argument doesn't hold up.
Before going into a comment on this I will add as I have before when we spoke about this that one would one be a fool to not at least consider the possibility and it is factual that certain elements in the ruling circles are eugenicists and no doubt would be perfectly happy to see significant population reduction.
First some population numbers for the US over the past 15 years.
The current population of U.S. in 2023 is 339,996,563, a 0.5% increase from 2022.
The current population of U.S. in 2022 is 338,289,857, a 0.38% increase from 2021;
The population of U.S. in 2021 was 336,997,624, a 0.31% increase from 2020;
The population of U.S. in 2020 was 335,942,003, a 0.49% increase from 2019;
The population of U.S. in 2019 was 334,319,671, a 0.66% increase from 2018.
And here are the figures from the preceding years dating back to 2007:
2018 332,140,037 0.71%
2017 329,791,231 0.79%
2016 327,210,198 0.80%
2015 324,607,776 0.80%
2014 322,033,964 0.83%
2013 319,375,166 0.86%
2012 316,651,321 0.88%
2011 313,876,608 0.87%
2010 311,182,845 0.87%
2009 308,512,035 0.92%
2008 305,694,910 0.97%
2007 302,743,399 1.00%
Now for the world over the last four years of data:
The current population of World in 2022 is 7,975,105,156, a 0.83% increase from 2021.
The population of World in 2021 was 7,909,295,151, a 0.87% increase from 2020.
The population of World in 2020 was 7,840,952,880, a 0.98% increase from 2019.
The population of World in 2019 was 7,764,951,032, a 1.06% increase from 2018.
In both instances there are population increases and decreases in rates of growth. For the US the rate decrease has been trending for quite some time though accelerated to the Covid policies and injections. However it doesn't come to the level of depopulation- population is increasing. If they are attempting this they are failing. Similar story for the world's population. 0.83% is the lowest growth rate seen since Macrotrends began tracking this in 1950 but as of yet depopulation doesn't seem to be happening.
Will this happen in the near future we shall see but at present I don't see cause for alarm on that front. I do see lifespans decreasing as people are getting sicker and sicker for numerous reasons including the battery of Pharma poisons they ingest and/or inject regularly.
Now directly to the US as far as Covid injections being a depop plan if it is the case they made a huge mistake. The two largest subsets of resisters are the African-American populace and the well armed southern hillbillies. These would be the first groups that such eugenicists would target for social and tactical reasons.
The largest subset of serial vaxxers are the liberal intelligentsia including all of the ruling class Ivy Leaguers who become the next set of bureaucrats, political viceroys, Cabinet members, day traders, hedge fund junkies, DC policy wonks and on and on. It makes little sense that they would be knowingly wiping out "their own" and I can testify that these people are taking these shots regularly and repeatedly getting quite sick from them.
There are several other internal contradictions to the depop thesis that involve Africa and Asia (definite targets for the eugenicists) but I'll leave it there for now.
We are all in agreement on the push for global, tyrannical totalitarianism.
We are also in agreement that there is a subset of the ruling class that genuinely believes in the overpopulation ideology.
We can also agree that they have been able to enact that ideology here and there over the years, e.g. tetanus vaccines in Africa laced with sterilizing agents.
So, what we are left with is the question of whether that ideology is driving the GMC in small or large part?
Is excess mortality and morbidity from the covid vaccines a depopulation goal or a symptom and by-product of something else?
Well, the depopulation hypothesis says it's a goal.
But on that logic, the childhood vaccine schedule is a depopulation agenda.
Also, on that logic, glyphosate is a depopulation agenda.
Every toxin that they get into our body, that causes death and disease, is a depop goal.
Here's the problem with the depopulation (as a goal) hypothesis. Even if you are right, who do you win over?
We have been broadly split into 3 groups.
The asleep, the believers, the TV watchers and readers of the Fact Checkers. Nothing we say to them can get through. A lost cause unfortunately.
The awake, those that will not take their injections, that have lost trust in government and The Science and authority. The dissidents. The depop hypothesis does nothing for this crowd besides rile them up even more. You are preaching to the choir. There is no return on investment here.
So, we have the large valuable middle, they don't quite know what to think anymore, they sort of know they have been lied to, are not quite sure how, have had their trust in authority damaged but not destroyed, and they are curious and looking for a message and messenger they can trust and follow out of Plato's Cave. These are our target audience, and they need to be won over retail, one by one.
The depop hypothesis does NOT WORK on this crowd. It is simply a bridge too far. To accept depop as a goal, you have to accept a whole raft of prior axioms; that there are evil people in the world, that they have captured governments and institutions, that they have a depop ideology and have gained the means of enacting it.
Discussing depop with the middle simply shuts them down, they will recoil and let go of your hand as you try to guide them (or should I say drag them) out of Plato's Cave.
Depop to the middle is a failed communication strategy (even if it is right).
Depop to the middle is an unforced error.
There are people, with the courage, knowledge, wisdom and credibility that are needed to guide plenty of these people out of The Cave, as they did for me. But they have successfully cut themselves off access to the middle because of their depop as a goal conviction.
Believing something to be true, and then saying it, are two different things and message.
If "truth" is not useful or helpful, what good is it?
Depop is the dissidents self-destruct button.
It's a crying shame and we are all worse off for it.
They can easily force everyone they tell to accept the jabs.
The alternative will be exclusion. From everything, step by step.
Most will accept. I will not. IтАЩve already decided my threshold & method.
Motivation? I donтАЩt believe thereтАЩs the slightest possibility itтАЩs for objective reasons like climate change or alleged over population.
You see, the parents of the perpetrators created these two illusions. So that they had excuses for those who require them.
IтАЩm at the margins here. Having no objective motive to hand yet seeing clearly where the destination is, IтАЩm led to consider truly diabolical explanations.
Why not? ItтАЩs only recently that weтАЩve trained ourselves to think that way of considering the world as mad. WhoтАЩs to say itтАЩs not real after all?
I donтАЩt need a motive. I know itтАЩs unsatisfying but I just donтАЩt.
If pressed for one? ItтАЩs the final titanic battle between good and evil.
If so, theyтАЩre ultimately going to lose, though long after weтАЩre gone.
I have nothing but respect for you Mike, you were integral in helping me help my family (and plenty of others) from getting injected. You have been one of the most important people in my life, ever.
With that said, I want to say something about relationships to the future.
If I'm optimistic or pessimistic about the future, in both cases I am right.
It's simply a premise. But regardless of how the future turns out, one of those premises will be more useful than the other as I journey there.
Which brings us to utility, and the utility of beliefs, and useful beliefs.
Depopulation (as a goal), as I have outlined earlier, has no utility as a message or communication strategy for the middle, maybe you disagree with that, but that is my experience. I can barely get those in the middle to accept that Covid is not Ebola, and that the spike protein is problematic and that turning your cells into an antigen factory is a bad idea. Let alone getting them to accept that "they are going to kill us all".
So, what other utility might there be?
What's the utility of going through life with an optimistic outlook, even though you have no idea how your life will end, or better still let's say one is terminal with 1 year to live. Is there a benefit to journey that last mile with a spring in your step and chin up. Is it helpful to others to see you that way? Does it help or hinder family and friends in their resilience? Are they more likely or less likely to want to spend time with you if you have a sparkle in your eye or a cloud over your head?
You were, and still have the potential to be, the most important voice in the dissident movement, more than McCullough, Malone, Berenson, etc but you have chosen an orientation to the future that has deprived you, me and everyone else of your power.
You are likely to not believe this, but you had the power to move millions out of the middle.
You still have that power.
It is Jan 2023 and not Jan 2021. A lot of good has happened in the dissident space. There are people with large audiences that will want to hear what you have to say, on a variety of subjects. You can still tool them up to help those around them out of the middle.
But not with Depopulation.
I am suggesting that you find the humility within you to accept that you might be wrong about it. ItтАЩs our enemyтАЩs hubris that is the problem. Our own hubris is just as deadly.
I am not a psychologist, but I suspect you are angry. Anger is the emotion of powerlessness.
They have taken much from us, without our consent, we were powerless to stop it, we have lost much. I suspect you are grieving over what has been lost. We can get stuck in grieving, sometimes for a lifetime. Grieving is useful, for a while, itтАЩs not useful for extended periods of time. A bit like cortisol, as you know, having too much of it in your system for extended periods of time is frankly terrible.
The utility of grieving is to arrive at acceptance, thatтАЩs it. Where we are no longer angry, depressed, pessimistic or basically kill joys. Where we become useful again.
Depopulation is the second cousin of Lizard People. ItтАЩs not the same thing, but from the same family. How can I take Icke and Alex Jones seriously, when they keep banging on about lizard people. LetтАЩs just assume for a minute that they are right about the lizards, and somewhere in the future, the ruling class take of their face masks and reveal their lizard heads and long, blue tongues. LetтАЩs even say itтАЩs 50/50 that that might happen. What good was talking about it, if it precluded me from listening to anything else those two men have to say, and they have a lot of worthwhile things to say. ItтАЩs self-sabotage, pandering to a niche riled up base, describe it as you will. But itтАЩs terrible communication strategy and a terrible way to live your life until the day they take off their masks.
If the goal is to destroy trust in liars, and lying institutions, which is a noble goal, there are at least 100 ways I can think off without saying that Michelle Obama is a male lizard.
Anyway, this comment is far longer than I intended. I hope you consider coming back to us, as I miss you, and I know many others do.
Direct question: what would you have me say to the waverers?
I should note that for myself, itтАЩs totally irrelevant whether the perpetrators intend mass killing or not, provided you agree they intend to impose totalitarian control. Or at least I think so. No freedom isnтАЩt a live-able situation.
Yes, I agree, they intend to bring in totalitarian control. I would even say that they have started the public rollout of a dictatorship that I think of as a Global Scientific Totalitarianism (GST). If we are going to discuss тАЬintentтАЭ, then we have no disagreement between us that this is absolutely their intent.
тАЬSovereign StatesтАЭ with their тАЬdemocraciesтАЭ are largely comfort food and window dressing. They are the dancing bear circus acts within the GST tent, thatтАЩs still in its infancy.
As to your question about what I would have you say to the waverers?
I will give it a shot, as I might never get this opportunity again.
The middle is large, but shrinking. It is largely damaged by now with 1 or 2 doses. I think the majority of the middle have not taken a 3rd, and will put up some resistance to anymore shots. Many of them know something is not quite right, and many of them have just enough curiosity to follow someone with a torchlight out of the cave.
We cannot have enough people with torchlights. You led me out with your light, for example.
There are plenty of things I think you could talk about, that would be incredibly helpful to people, as you are a great teacher and explainer. I still remember how you explained тАЬdriftтАЭ from your garage, and how our natural immunity can deal with viral drift. You have the knack or turning the complex into simple, in a way that is non-threatening.
Here are just some of the things I can think of:
1. Helping the damaged understand what is happening inside them, and what they might be able to do to at least reduce the speed of the damage or even get some recovery if possible.
2. Being a source of easy to understand interpretation of some of the main honest scientific findings coming out such as IgG4. I bet you could explain that to the man on the street, better than anyone else in the dissident movement today. Or even debunking the dishonest science, such as the bullshit 20m lives saved number.
3. Explaining to people the military grade psyops their government is using against them and what they can do to fight it.
I could go on; you get the gist.
You might think that you are not a subject matter expert on all these, you donтАЩt need to be, you could be leading discussions with honest brokers and getting the word out.
A little bit of money on semi-decent production values, and you would be able to produce great looking video content that will do the rounds and make a huge difference. We are way beyond relying on YouTube to get our message out.
But, if you pressed me to identify just one issue that you could talk about, that would have the biggest long terms impact, it would be that of the childhood vaccination schedule. ThatтАЩs it.
I am sure you know by now that they have lied to us all about that, itтАЩs necessity, its safety, and its efficacy. At every turn they have lied, and for decades, we have been injecting babies with cocktails of antigen (70+ in the US, 40+ in Australia, donтАЩt know what it is in the UK) and chemicals (some 38 in total), into babies and infants from the second they come out of the womb. The superstructure, that is our world, is built on a poisoned base.
I will go further and say, that the GST is built on all the falsehoods of the childhood vaccine schedule. ItтАЩs scientific falsehoods, itтАЩs political falsehoods and its cultural, moral, and spiritual falsehoods.
I will go one step further and say that the Achilles heal of the GST is the childhood vaccine schedule.
The more people that wake up to that and decide to take a stand for their kids, the harder and harder it will be to bring on the GST.
It is the ultimate destroyer of trust in the false idols of our time. If you choose to pick up this axe Mike, your swings will greatly accelerate the bringing down of these liars.
I know you are not worried about your place in civil society, you got banished from that a long time ago. You have nothing to lose from being tarred an anti-vaxxer. One day it will be accepted as a badge of honour, maybe not in our lifetime, but one day.
I appreciate your efforts to show depopulation isnтАЩt successful if thatтАЩs what it is.
I must be clear: I think that effort is to come. It is simple once they have totalitarian control via mandatory digital ID & CBDC.
I believe then thatтАЩs what theyтАЩll do with that power.
From a purely transactional standpoint it is not necessary to permit 8 billion grubby humans to exist, consuming тАЬtheirтАЭ non renewable resources.
We can already see the shape of things to come, which is energy / heat death. ThatтАЩs what net zero implies.
They arenтАЩt kindly people.
Once weтАЩre no longer industriously providing for ourselves & throwing off old fashioned cash, we literally have no purpose & I can understand why theyтАЩll just turn us off.
Why would they not?
I point out again this fact: as a biologist of 40 years training and practise, the mRNA injections have no purpose or effect except to induce auto immune attack.
No other objective but injury & death is plausible.
I welcome rebuttal, but ignoring the immunology coupled with factory building and deal announcements isnтАЩt reasonable.
The attempt at tyrannical totalitarianism is underway and on this in complete agreement.
Below I will explain a bit about why I think the depopulation argument doesn't hold up.
Before going into a comment on this I will add as I have before when we spoke about this that one would one be a fool to not at least consider the possibility and it is factual that certain elements in the ruling circles are eugenicists and no doubt would be perfectly happy to see significant population reduction.
First some population numbers for the US over the past 15 years.
The current population of U.S. in 2023 is 339,996,563, a 0.5% increase from 2022.
The current population of U.S. in 2022 is 338,289,857, a 0.38% increase from 2021;
The population of U.S. in 2021 was 336,997,624, a 0.31% increase from 2020;
The population of U.S. in 2020 was 335,942,003, a 0.49% increase from 2019;
The population of U.S. in 2019 was 334,319,671, a 0.66% increase from 2018.
And here are the figures from the preceding years dating back to 2007:
2018 332,140,037 0.71%
2017 329,791,231 0.79%
2016 327,210,198 0.80%
2015 324,607,776 0.80%
2014 322,033,964 0.83%
2013 319,375,166 0.86%
2012 316,651,321 0.88%
2011 313,876,608 0.87%
2010 311,182,845 0.87%
2009 308,512,035 0.92%
2008 305,694,910 0.97%
2007 302,743,399 1.00%
Now for the world over the last four years of data:
The current population of World in 2022 is 7,975,105,156, a 0.83% increase from 2021.
The population of World in 2021 was 7,909,295,151, a 0.87% increase from 2020.
The population of World in 2020 was 7,840,952,880, a 0.98% increase from 2019.
The population of World in 2019 was 7,764,951,032, a 1.06% increase from 2018.
In both instances there are population increases and decreases in rates of growth. For the US the rate decrease has been trending for quite some time though accelerated to the Covid policies and injections. However it doesn't come to the level of depopulation- population is increasing. If they are attempting this they are failing. Similar story for the world's population. 0.83% is the lowest growth rate seen since Macrotrends began tracking this in 1950 but as of yet depopulation doesn't seem to be happening.
Will this happen in the near future we shall see but at present I don't see cause for alarm on that front. I do see lifespans decreasing as people are getting sicker and sicker for numerous reasons including the battery of Pharma poisons they ingest and/or inject regularly.
Now directly to the US as far as Covid injections being a depop plan if it is the case they made a huge mistake. The two largest subsets of resisters are the African-American populace and the well armed southern hillbillies. These would be the first groups that such eugenicists would target for social and tactical reasons.
The largest subset of serial vaxxers are the liberal intelligentsia including all of the ruling class Ivy Leaguers who become the next set of bureaucrats, political viceroys, Cabinet members, day traders, hedge fund junkies, DC policy wonks and on and on. It makes little sense that they would be knowingly wiping out "their own" and I can testify that these people are taking these shots regularly and repeatedly getting quite sick from them.
There are several other internal contradictions to the depop thesis that involve Africa and Asia (definite targets for the eugenicists) but I'll leave it there for now.
Here are my two cents worth on depopulation.
We are all in agreement on the push for global, tyrannical totalitarianism.
We are also in agreement that there is a subset of the ruling class that genuinely believes in the overpopulation ideology.
We can also agree that they have been able to enact that ideology here and there over the years, e.g. tetanus vaccines in Africa laced with sterilizing agents.
So, what we are left with is the question of whether that ideology is driving the GMC in small or large part?
Is excess mortality and morbidity from the covid vaccines a depopulation goal or a symptom and by-product of something else?
Well, the depopulation hypothesis says it's a goal.
But on that logic, the childhood vaccine schedule is a depopulation agenda.
Also, on that logic, glyphosate is a depopulation agenda.
Every toxin that they get into our body, that causes death and disease, is a depop goal.
Here's the problem with the depopulation (as a goal) hypothesis. Even if you are right, who do you win over?
We have been broadly split into 3 groups.
The asleep, the believers, the TV watchers and readers of the Fact Checkers. Nothing we say to them can get through. A lost cause unfortunately.
The awake, those that will not take their injections, that have lost trust in government and The Science and authority. The dissidents. The depop hypothesis does nothing for this crowd besides rile them up even more. You are preaching to the choir. There is no return on investment here.
So, we have the large valuable middle, they don't quite know what to think anymore, they sort of know they have been lied to, are not quite sure how, have had their trust in authority damaged but not destroyed, and they are curious and looking for a message and messenger they can trust and follow out of Plato's Cave. These are our target audience, and they need to be won over retail, one by one.
The depop hypothesis does NOT WORK on this crowd. It is simply a bridge too far. To accept depop as a goal, you have to accept a whole raft of prior axioms; that there are evil people in the world, that they have captured governments and institutions, that they have a depop ideology and have gained the means of enacting it.
Discussing depop with the middle simply shuts them down, they will recoil and let go of your hand as you try to guide them (or should I say drag them) out of Plato's Cave.
Depop to the middle is a failed communication strategy (even if it is right).
Depop to the middle is an unforced error.
There are people, with the courage, knowledge, wisdom and credibility that are needed to guide plenty of these people out of The Cave, as they did for me. But they have successfully cut themselves off access to the middle because of their depop as a goal conviction.
Believing something to be true, and then saying it, are two different things and message.
If "truth" is not useful or helpful, what good is it?
Depop is the dissidents self-destruct button.
It's a crying shame and we are all worse off for it.
They can easily force everyone they tell to accept the jabs.
The alternative will be exclusion. From everything, step by step.
Most will accept. I will not. IтАЩve already decided my threshold & method.
Motivation? I donтАЩt believe thereтАЩs the slightest possibility itтАЩs for objective reasons like climate change or alleged over population.
You see, the parents of the perpetrators created these two illusions. So that they had excuses for those who require them.
IтАЩm at the margins here. Having no objective motive to hand yet seeing clearly where the destination is, IтАЩm led to consider truly diabolical explanations.
Why not? ItтАЩs only recently that weтАЩve trained ourselves to think that way of considering the world as mad. WhoтАЩs to say itтАЩs not real after all?
I donтАЩt need a motive. I know itтАЩs unsatisfying but I just donтАЩt.
If pressed for one? ItтАЩs the final titanic battle between good and evil.
If so, theyтАЩre ultimately going to lose, though long after weтАЩre gone.
I have nothing but respect for you Mike, you were integral in helping me help my family (and plenty of others) from getting injected. You have been one of the most important people in my life, ever.
With that said, I want to say something about relationships to the future.
If I'm optimistic or pessimistic about the future, in both cases I am right.
It's simply a premise. But regardless of how the future turns out, one of those premises will be more useful than the other as I journey there.
Which brings us to utility, and the utility of beliefs, and useful beliefs.
Depopulation (as a goal), as I have outlined earlier, has no utility as a message or communication strategy for the middle, maybe you disagree with that, but that is my experience. I can barely get those in the middle to accept that Covid is not Ebola, and that the spike protein is problematic and that turning your cells into an antigen factory is a bad idea. Let alone getting them to accept that "they are going to kill us all".
So, what other utility might there be?
What's the utility of going through life with an optimistic outlook, even though you have no idea how your life will end, or better still let's say one is terminal with 1 year to live. Is there a benefit to journey that last mile with a spring in your step and chin up. Is it helpful to others to see you that way? Does it help or hinder family and friends in their resilience? Are they more likely or less likely to want to spend time with you if you have a sparkle in your eye or a cloud over your head?
You were, and still have the potential to be, the most important voice in the dissident movement, more than McCullough, Malone, Berenson, etc but you have chosen an orientation to the future that has deprived you, me and everyone else of your power.
You are likely to not believe this, but you had the power to move millions out of the middle.
You still have that power.
It is Jan 2023 and not Jan 2021. A lot of good has happened in the dissident space. There are people with large audiences that will want to hear what you have to say, on a variety of subjects. You can still tool them up to help those around them out of the middle.
But not with Depopulation.
I am suggesting that you find the humility within you to accept that you might be wrong about it. ItтАЩs our enemyтАЩs hubris that is the problem. Our own hubris is just as deadly.
I am not a psychologist, but I suspect you are angry. Anger is the emotion of powerlessness.
They have taken much from us, without our consent, we were powerless to stop it, we have lost much. I suspect you are grieving over what has been lost. We can get stuck in grieving, sometimes for a lifetime. Grieving is useful, for a while, itтАЩs not useful for extended periods of time. A bit like cortisol, as you know, having too much of it in your system for extended periods of time is frankly terrible.
The utility of grieving is to arrive at acceptance, thatтАЩs it. Where we are no longer angry, depressed, pessimistic or basically kill joys. Where we become useful again.
Depopulation is the second cousin of Lizard People. ItтАЩs not the same thing, but from the same family. How can I take Icke and Alex Jones seriously, when they keep banging on about lizard people. LetтАЩs just assume for a minute that they are right about the lizards, and somewhere in the future, the ruling class take of their face masks and reveal their lizard heads and long, blue tongues. LetтАЩs even say itтАЩs 50/50 that that might happen. What good was talking about it, if it precluded me from listening to anything else those two men have to say, and they have a lot of worthwhile things to say. ItтАЩs self-sabotage, pandering to a niche riled up base, describe it as you will. But itтАЩs terrible communication strategy and a terrible way to live your life until the day they take off their masks.
If the goal is to destroy trust in liars, and lying institutions, which is a noble goal, there are at least 100 ways I can think off without saying that Michelle Obama is a male lizard.
Anyway, this comment is far longer than I intended. I hope you consider coming back to us, as I miss you, and I know many others do.
With love.
Unbekoming
IтАЩm actually more chilled than in many years.
Direct question: what would you have me say to the waverers?
I should note that for myself, itтАЩs totally irrelevant whether the perpetrators intend mass killing or not, provided you agree they intend to impose totalitarian control. Or at least I think so. No freedom isnтАЩt a live-able situation.
Yes, I agree, they intend to bring in totalitarian control. I would even say that they have started the public rollout of a dictatorship that I think of as a Global Scientific Totalitarianism (GST). If we are going to discuss тАЬintentтАЭ, then we have no disagreement between us that this is absolutely their intent.
тАЬSovereign StatesтАЭ with their тАЬdemocraciesтАЭ are largely comfort food and window dressing. They are the dancing bear circus acts within the GST tent, thatтАЩs still in its infancy.
As to your question about what I would have you say to the waverers?
I will give it a shot, as I might never get this opportunity again.
The middle is large, but shrinking. It is largely damaged by now with 1 or 2 doses. I think the majority of the middle have not taken a 3rd, and will put up some resistance to anymore shots. Many of them know something is not quite right, and many of them have just enough curiosity to follow someone with a torchlight out of the cave.
We cannot have enough people with torchlights. You led me out with your light, for example.
There are plenty of things I think you could talk about, that would be incredibly helpful to people, as you are a great teacher and explainer. I still remember how you explained тАЬdriftтАЭ from your garage, and how our natural immunity can deal with viral drift. You have the knack or turning the complex into simple, in a way that is non-threatening.
Here are just some of the things I can think of:
1. Helping the damaged understand what is happening inside them, and what they might be able to do to at least reduce the speed of the damage or even get some recovery if possible.
2. Being a source of easy to understand interpretation of some of the main honest scientific findings coming out such as IgG4. I bet you could explain that to the man on the street, better than anyone else in the dissident movement today. Or even debunking the dishonest science, such as the bullshit 20m lives saved number.
3. Explaining to people the military grade psyops their government is using against them and what they can do to fight it.
I could go on; you get the gist.
You might think that you are not a subject matter expert on all these, you donтАЩt need to be, you could be leading discussions with honest brokers and getting the word out.
A little bit of money on semi-decent production values, and you would be able to produce great looking video content that will do the rounds and make a huge difference. We are way beyond relying on YouTube to get our message out.
But, if you pressed me to identify just one issue that you could talk about, that would have the biggest long terms impact, it would be that of the childhood vaccination schedule. ThatтАЩs it.
I am sure you know by now that they have lied to us all about that, itтАЩs necessity, its safety, and its efficacy. At every turn they have lied, and for decades, we have been injecting babies with cocktails of antigen (70+ in the US, 40+ in Australia, donтАЩt know what it is in the UK) and chemicals (some 38 in total), into babies and infants from the second they come out of the womb. The superstructure, that is our world, is built on a poisoned base.
I will go further and say, that the GST is built on all the falsehoods of the childhood vaccine schedule. ItтАЩs scientific falsehoods, itтАЩs political falsehoods and its cultural, moral, and spiritual falsehoods.
I will go one step further and say that the Achilles heal of the GST is the childhood vaccine schedule.
The more people that wake up to that and decide to take a stand for their kids, the harder and harder it will be to bring on the GST.
It is the ultimate destroyer of trust in the false idols of our time. If you choose to pick up this axe Mike, your swings will greatly accelerate the bringing down of these liars.
I know you are not worried about your place in civil society, you got banished from that a long time ago. You have nothing to lose from being tarred an anti-vaxxer. One day it will be accepted as a badge of honour, maybe not in our lifetime, but one day.
Once again, thank you Mike!
Frank
I appreciate your efforts to show depopulation isnтАЩt successful if thatтАЩs what it is.
I must be clear: I think that effort is to come. It is simple once they have totalitarian control via mandatory digital ID & CBDC.
I believe then thatтАЩs what theyтАЩll do with that power.
From a purely transactional standpoint it is not necessary to permit 8 billion grubby humans to exist, consuming тАЬtheirтАЭ non renewable resources.
We can already see the shape of things to come, which is energy / heat death. ThatтАЩs what net zero implies.
They arenтАЩt kindly people.
Once weтАЩre no longer industriously providing for ourselves & throwing off old fashioned cash, we literally have no purpose & I can understand why theyтАЩll just turn us off.
Why would they not?
I point out again this fact: as a biologist of 40 years training and practise, the mRNA injections have no purpose or effect except to induce auto immune attack.
No other objective but injury & death is plausible.
I welcome rebuttal, but ignoring the immunology coupled with factory building and deal announcements isnтАЩt reasonable.