These stories are all fascinating, as they challenge the storying telling by the victors.
One thing I find fascinating though, is the lense through which we perceive these reveals.
"The Lusitania is a very important WW1 event, maybe one of the most important."
This is a fascinating perspective to be honest. It is posed in such a way to present the idea that this event was pivotal, and without it, the Americans would not have entered the war. But I will argue that is a false premise because I don't think false flags are pivotal in a sense that their absence would have changed the course of events. Much akin to a massive forest fire, the spark is not really a pivotal event because the conditions are a result of a long slow buildup at which point any number of sparks can trigger the event.
If the Americans wanted to join the war, and in fact, were already participating in it, then this is not pivotal. It was simply the tactic that succeeded in breaking it to the public who due to propaganda didn't know the intentions ahead of time. If the Germans had not sunk the Lucitania, I am certain, there was a plan B, a plan C, and a plan D that would have involved informing the public that America was going to war with the Germans.
I also don't think the bankers and such fear this particular act as portrayed. What they really fear, is the exposition of any act of public manipulation because they fear being exposed for the way they have manipulated the public for over a century through complicit media. They are losing that battle thanks to social media, and some of the craziness we see is a last gasp attempt to replace old media with a new version of control of information.
So while these stories are absolutely essential to tell to help accelerate our shift away from a century of mainstream propaganda, I think we're doing a disservice by presenting them as pivotal events that changed the course of history. The only thing that was pivotal was the carefully crafted and manipulated public opinion which was going to be changed no matter what because the course of history had already long been set before any of these pivotal events.
In the world wars, the real pivotal events were set by diplomacy between Germany and Russia. Those were actual pivotal events that set the course of history as they determined the outcome of the strategic wars.
These stories are all fascinating, as they challenge the storying telling by the victors.
One thing I find fascinating though, is the lense through which we perceive these reveals.
"The Lusitania is a very important WW1 event, maybe one of the most important."
This is a fascinating perspective to be honest. It is posed in such a way to present the idea that this event was pivotal, and without it, the Americans would not have entered the war. But I will argue that is a false premise because I don't think false flags are pivotal in a sense that their absence would have changed the course of events. Much akin to a massive forest fire, the spark is not really a pivotal event because the conditions are a result of a long slow buildup at which point any number of sparks can trigger the event.
If the Americans wanted to join the war, and in fact, were already participating in it, then this is not pivotal. It was simply the tactic that succeeded in breaking it to the public who due to propaganda didn't know the intentions ahead of time. If the Germans had not sunk the Lucitania, I am certain, there was a plan B, a plan C, and a plan D that would have involved informing the public that America was going to war with the Germans.
I also don't think the bankers and such fear this particular act as portrayed. What they really fear, is the exposition of any act of public manipulation because they fear being exposed for the way they have manipulated the public for over a century through complicit media. They are losing that battle thanks to social media, and some of the craziness we see is a last gasp attempt to replace old media with a new version of control of information.
So while these stories are absolutely essential to tell to help accelerate our shift away from a century of mainstream propaganda, I think we're doing a disservice by presenting them as pivotal events that changed the course of history. The only thing that was pivotal was the carefully crafted and manipulated public opinion which was going to be changed no matter what because the course of history had already long been set before any of these pivotal events.
In the world wars, the real pivotal events were set by diplomacy between Germany and Russia. Those were actual pivotal events that set the course of history as they determined the outcome of the strategic wars.
Good point.