48 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
DanB1973's avatar

Of course, this is true. Everything here.

But… nothing is new here. We have known these things for years or decades. In the worst scenario, since the time when The Highwire was first aired on April 13, 2017 - SEVEN years to the day.

The question is thus:

Why are we talking about THE SAME things so many times, from the same angle, using the same logical reasoning, arriving at the same conclusions - and NOTHING is being done by the healthcare authorities?

Greg_In_Oz's avatar

That’s the $6 million question … some paradigms are simply too confronting to break. The idea that a huge portion of “healthcare”, the pharma side in particular, is essentially a colossal rort underwritten by the government, regulators, Wall Street and the insurance industry, all of whom profit from it in different ways financially or politically, is a bridge too far for generations of people brought up to trust the system, who take a pill for anything and everything, who eat like shit, and sit at home apathetically watching reruns of “Farmer Watches a Baking Show While Surviving in the Jungle”, who haven’t read a book in two decades and think the nice blonde woman on the news is giving it to them straight.

DanB1973's avatar

My guess is different: “Pharma” is not big. It is built on small people working in the field (exceptions excluded). When they are admitted to medical schools, their life changes in an instant. They become important. Their friends will consult them. They can give advice, no liability involved - because, you know, everyone is different and you should go to see your doctor, anyway. They become missionaries on a mission to become someone. Money (salaries) is so far away on the horizon that it becomes irrelevant.

When they got their license, or when they are hired by a medical facility to do anything, from cleaning to deliveries, they become a small-scale James Bond. These benefits for the ego and the power trip compensate everything else. In hard times, when a patient decides to challenge the facility, they will defend it more than their own home. Doctors will not discuss other doctors, that’s the local code of silence. When their facility introduces a killing protocol, they will not say a word. Following orders is great because “yes, the patient died, but that’s the protocol, I couldn’t do anything differently, I would be fired.”

This morality is the foundation of the existence of diseasecare facilities. It spreads like wildfire. It allows a respected journal to publish a number of fraudulent papers, all peer-reviewed, which everybody is talking about, and - zero consequences. If they were a normal business, the journal would be destroyed by litigation in a few weeks, reviewers would never find any work in their fields, and money will flow in damages like a waterfall.

The big boys (from doctors upwards) are so separated from this lower class that they are not even aware of these mechanisms. They have their own worries. The lower class fights to keep the façade. The big boys make fame and money. The middle class does not exist. There is no human(e) connection between the two. Here is the source of the problem: the medical sector is self-limiting, despite its merciless infectivity. In the above image, the host doesn’t matter at all. Who is speaking out about the need to reform the medical sector? Only the hosts…

This is only a hypothesis. It may be wrong. A similar story is with education, by the way.

Greg_In_Oz's avatar

That’s a detailed reply and I don’t disagree!!! I’m going to have a long think about it, but one thing that I disagree on is the assertion that it’s all built on individuals or small people … the conglomerate of small people acting in unison towards their perceived version of the “greater good”, or more accurately their own collective, narcissistic self-interest, is exactly what enables the hive-mind to exist … the god complex is engendered and habitual, but the individuals all feed into the hive mind of sick care (or any other parasitic structure were conditioned to respect).

JacqNSW's avatar

"This morality is the foundation of the existence of diseasecare facilities." Morality! Yep, a pond scum mentality of "Morality".

These purported educated morons who are involved these facilities are nothing but gelatinous brain dead, never taught to think for themselves zombies. Follow the money!

DanB1973's avatar

Well, the fact that we are now living in what we have proves that they are far more skillful, intelligent and - most of all - dedicated to their causes - than we (you, me, normal, common people) have ever been.

If you read history, you will find that “we” are capable of decent, heroic acts always when a leader turns up at the proper time, at the proper place and in the proper circumstances. We are the crowd, unable to think about the future in terms of preventing bad things. As a crowd, we tend to lie low and wait until things disappear on their own or until somebody else takes care of them.

Maybe this is why “they” emphasize so strongly educating and creating leaders and leadership. They do not teach self-defense or the art of hiding and waiting.

What are we teaching our kids? Substitutes of education at schools and obedience at home. Sure enough, our kids become quite proficient at both…

We do not teach our kids - or ourselves - how to read other people, take initiative when needed, interpret what people mean when they are saying something else, not trust anybody in any position of power or authority, not to fall for fancy talks about higher good, and so on…

We get what we are prepared for…

JacqNSW's avatar

Agreed. The Tavastock Institution believe they have All bases covered when it comes to human interactions/behaviour. Lest they forget!

I educated my children on a remote property and taught them to be individuals and believe in their gut instinct; to be their own leaders and think for themselves and not get involved with any flock.

Are You over being controlled and bullied by controllers! Do You still have the capability to think for yourself beyond the loud, psychop media noise?

VEHEMENTLY YES! To Your written words "We get what we are prepared for…"

I Shall Never comply to tyranny and I am prepared for the Long Haul. I am in control of me.

Katherine's avatar

You use "we" several times. Who is "we"?

DanB1973's avatar

“We” is “you” with no emotional load. If I write “you should never ask about “we””, you may take it as a personal “you” - addressing “you” as an individual persons. And my intention was the general English “everybody”. Misunderstandings unavoidable.

“We” is you and me and everybody else.