Actions
Bug #58793
closedDeleteMultiObj crashes when rgw_beast_enable_async=0
% Done:
100%
Source:
Backport:
quincy reef
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Tags (freeform):
Merge Commit:
Fixed In:
v18.0.0-2702-g835e203ca99
Released In:
v19.2.0~2780
Upkeep Timestamp:
2025-07-12T17:38:42+00:00
Description
/usr/include/c++/12/optional:477: constexpr _Tp& std::_Optional_base_impl<_Tp, _Dp>::_M_get() [with _Tp = boost::asio::basic_deadline_timer<boost::posix_time: :ptime>; _Dp = std::_Optional_base<boost::asio::basic_deadline_timer<boost::posix_time::ptime>, false, false>]: Assertion 'this->_M_is_engaged()' failed. *** Caught signal (Aborted) ** in thread 7f7c8c2d66c0 thread_name:radosgw ceph version Development (no_version) reef (dev) 1: /home/cbodley/ceph/build/bin/radosgw(+0xf78569) [0x55b08adaf569] 2: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x3cb20) [0x7f7cbf77fb20] 3: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x8ce5c) [0x7f7cbf7cfe5c] 4: gsignal() 5: abort() 6: (__gnu_debug::_Safe_sequence_base::_M_get_mutex()+0) [0x7f7cbfad7e80] 7: /home/cbodley/ceph/build/bin/radosgw(+0xa43baf) [0x55b08a87abaf] 8: (RGWDeleteMultiObj::execute(optional_yield)+0x38f) [0x55b08a86d23b]
Updated by Casey Bodley about 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Fix Under Review
- Assignee set to Casey Bodley
- Pull request ID set to 50171
Updated by Casey Bodley about 3 years ago
- Status changed from Fix Under Review to Pending Backport
- Backport set to quincy reef
Updated by Upkeep Bot about 3 years ago
- Copied to Backport #58896: quincy: DeleteMultiObj crashes when rgw_beast_enable_async=0 added
Updated by Steven Goodliff over 2 years ago
Hi,
should this be backported to Reef ?, i can only see the quincy backport ticket.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/main/src/rgw/rgw_op.cc#L7223
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/v18.2.0/src/rgw/rgw_op.cc#L7193
thanks
Updated by Upkeep Bot over 2 years ago
- Copied to Backport #63279: reef: DeleteMultiObj crashes when rgw_beast_enable_async=0 added
Updated by Casey Bodley over 2 years ago
Steven Goodliff wrote:
Hi,
should this be backported to Reef ?, i can only see the quincy backport ticket.
thanks for catching this! prepared the reef backport in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54124 for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63279
Updated by Konstantin Shalygin about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Updated by Upkeep Bot 8 months ago
- Merge Commit set to 835e203ca99bcd8aea37e2cbc208ee34d87dd8eb
- Fixed In set to v18.0.0-2702-g835e203ca99
- Released In set to v19.2.0~2780
- Upkeep Timestamp set to 2025-07-12T17:38:42+00:00
Actions