Op-Ed: California Should Renew State Funding for Food Security | Civil Eats

Op-Ed: California Should Renew State Funding for Food Security

The CalFresh Fruit and Vegetable EBT Program and the California Nutrition Incentive Program benefit vulnerable populations, farmers, and local economies.

A Calfresh Market Match shopper selecting fresh, farm-grown vegetables at an Ecology Center farmers’ market in Berkeley, CA. (Photo courtesy of Ecology Center)

A Calfresh Market Match shopper selecting fresh, farm-grown vegetables at an Ecology Center farmers’ market in Berkeley, California. (Photo courtesy of Ecology Center)

Last month, Governor Gavin Newsom released an updated budget proposal for 2026-27 that omitted funding for two essential food security programs: the California Nutrition Incentive Program (CNIP), also known as Market Match, and the CalFresh Fruit and Vegetable EBT Program.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

Market Match gives shoppers who use CalFresh (California’s name for the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) a dollar-for-dollar match of up to $15 per visit to purchase fresh produce at farm-direct sites like certified farmers’ markets, mobile markets, and farmstands. The Fruit and Vegetable Program provides a dollar-for-dollar match of up to $60 per month, instantly rebated to a CalFresh shopper’s EBT card when they buy fresh produce at participating grocery stores.

As professionals who have worked to advance healthy, just, and resilient food and agriculture policies throughout our careers, we know first-hand the extensive economic and community benefits of state investments like these—not only to CalFresh participants but also to food retailers and small-scale farmers.

Unlike traditional charitable feeding programs that often rely on food donations or offer inconsistent access to fresh, culturally relevant foods, Market Match and the Fruit and Vegetable Program provide supplemental benefits that work like cash. They give consumers the freedom to choose from California’s produce bounty while supporting the state’s food and farming economies.

Without new funding, however, these programs could disappear from our statewide nutrition safety net—precisely when federal support is also shrinking. With only days to go until the June 15 deadline for passing a state budget, the California legislature and Governor Newsom must prioritize funding that increases healthy food access for our state’s most vulnerable populations.

A promotion for the CalFresh Fruit and Vegetable EBT pilot program at a Harvest Market store in Northern California. (Photo courtesy of California Department of Social Services)

A promotion for the CalFresh Fruit and Vegetable EBT pilot program at a Harvest Market store in Fort Bragg, California. (Photo courtesy of Denisse Becerra / Fullwell)

Long before the steep cuts to food assistance mandated by last year’s federal budget bill began taking effect, low-income Californians were struggling to put healthy food on the table. In 2024, federal CalFresh benefits did not cover the cost of a moderately priced meal in all 58 California counties. For years, CalFresh benefit amounts have tended to fall short of families’ needs, with a significant number of participants running out of money before month’s end.

California’s supplemental CalFresh programs stepped in to fill the nutritional gap. The Fruit and Vegetable Program, championed by state Senator Scott Wiener (D-District 11) and Assemblymember Alex Lee (D-District 24), is a documented success at alleviating hunger and increasing access to healthy, minimally processed foods.

Administered by the California Department of Social Services and first piloted in 2023, it is operating for a third year thanks to a $36 million allocation in the current budget. Yet without additional resources, it is expected to run out of funds and shut down by the end of June.

Participation in the program, which operates in 91 grocery stores, has grown every month since it relaunched in November 2025, demonstrating its immense value in people’s lives. In April 2026 alone, the program reached 92,000 households, providing nearly $4.85 million in fruit and vegetable supplemental benefits.

Since its inception, it has served more than 325,000 unique California households. Senator Wiener and Assemblymember Lee are seeking $100 million in next year’s budget to support the year-round operation of the Fruit and Vegetable Program and allow for modest expansion into currently unserved communities.

Market Match, the nationally recognized initiative that inspired the Fruit and Vegetable Program, is the largest state grant funded by the California Nutrition Incentive Program (CNIP). Administered by the California Department of Food & Agriculture, Market Match helps recipients of CalFresh, Senior Farmers Market Nutrition Program, and Women, Infants and Children (WIC) purchase California-grown fresh fruits and vegetables.

Although Market Match has a 15-year track record of improving nutrition and increasing agricultural sales, it too is at risk of being eliminated. Program funding will run out in early 2027 without additional resources.

In 2025 alone, Market Match supported more than 627,000 shoppers at nearly 300 farmers’ markets, delivered nearly 50 million servings of California-grown produce statewide, and kept food dollars in communities where they were spent. Every dollar spent with local family farmers generates $3 for the local economy. Market Match also draws down federal funding through the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

Senator Josh Becker (D-District 13) and Assemblymember Damon Connolly (D-District 12) have championed a phased budget request for CNIP/Market Match funding, starting with $20 million in the 2026-27 budget cycle, increasing to $30 million in 2027-2028, and building to $50 million in 2028-2029. This would allow the program to expand to all farmers’ markets statewide and increase the match from $15 to $20 per visit.

Developing a budget plan that appropriately mitigates the H.R. 1 mandates has, understandably, been a priority for Governor Newsom and the Legislature this year. However, leaving Market Match and the Fruit and Vegetable Program unfunded—which may seem like savings now—will place a strain on future administrations and on our state’s welfare.

Once the onerous new requirements imposed by H.R. 1 are fully implemented, more than 3 million Californians, from every district, are projected to lose some or all of their CalFresh benefits. And reducing food benefits for those who remain eligible is likely to worsen hunger and increase associated public healthcare costs.

Moreover, federal safety net cuts are coming at a time when low-income Californians are facing unprecedented economic challenges, with food and gas prices rapidly rising. A relatively modest investment in each program for the next budget cycle—$20 million for Market Match and $100 million for the Fruit and Vegetable Program, or less than 0.05 percent of the state budget—will make an enormous difference in the lives of the most vulnerable Californians.

In California, budget reviews happen simultaneously in the Senate and the Assembly, and then the two chambers meet to create a unified plan, due June 15. As of June 2, California’s Senate has included neither program in its budget priorities. The Assembly has proposed $15 million in funding for CNIP, which would extend Market Match operations until December 2027 but not allow it to expand to new sites or increase the daily match. The Assembly has not yet proposed funding for the Fruit and Vegetable Program.

Between now and June 15, California leaders have a clear choice: protect Market Match and the Fruit and Vegetable Program, or allow food to become even less affordable for Californians while withdrawing an economic boost for farmers, grocers, and local communities. Voters can act, too, by asking state leaders to support the budget requests for a robustly funded Fruit and Vegetable Program here, and Market Match here.

We can’t think of a better way for Governor Newsom to advance his goal of working towards a better life for all than by funding these essential food security programs. Everyone deserves access to healthy food.

You’d be a great Civil Eats supporter…

Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our supporters to keep producing our award-winning work.

Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a supporter, your contributions directly fund our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.

Your support will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.

Lena Brook is deputy director at Fullwell, a San Francisco Bay Area-based policy advocacy organization, where she leads campaigns to expand values-aligned food procurement and strengthen the food and nutrition safety net. Read more >

Andy Naja-Riese has 18 years of experience in food systems and health policy. As CEO of the Agricultural Institute of Marin (AIM), he leads strategic initiatives, advocacy, and a capital campaign for AIM’s Center for Food and Agriculture. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

More from

Commentary

Featured

Popular

New World Screwworm Outbreak Leads Senate Dems to Push for USDA Action

cattle grazing behind a fence. (Photo credit: Benjamin Cheng, Unsplash)

USDA Offers Millions of Dollars to Support Small Meatpacking Plants

Workers at the Sam Kane beef slaughterhouse in Corpus Christi, Texas on June 10, 2008 dissect, sort and separate beef parts. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) inspectors are on site to ensure the beef is processed in accordance with USDA FSIS regulations. (Photo credit: Alice Welch USDA)

New World Screwworm Returns to the U.S., Decades After Eradication

Cowboys herding cattle in a feedlot in Texas. (Photo credit: Andy Sacks, Getty Images)

School Meal Advocates Caution Against ‘Scary’ USDA Reorganization

The U.S. Department of Agriculture headquarters, with the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker logo superimposed. (Photo credit: Art Wagner, Getty Images)