
Paris, 1978. Two young women meet on the steps of the Sacré-Cœur. Laure is French, haughty and magnetising. Erica is English – from King’s Lynn, fat and beautiful, spending the summer as a solo traveller before university in the autumn. When a man harasses Erica, Laure barks at him until he leaves and then invites Erica for a drink. Laure is gay and enjoys seducing women.
It was as if Laure spoke a language only they understood. She could make them laugh and blush and later, come as they never had before.
She is having an affair with a married woman and has sex with her friends, including Hilde, who is in love with her. Erica has never kissed a woman before Laure, earning her the nickname ‘the tourist’. Regardless, an issue with a lost bag and Erica’s lack of money leads to her moving into Laure’s squat for the summer and engaging in a passionate fling that will change the course of both of their lives.
Although they both know that this could be something more, they are both stubborn. Laure, used to doing as she pleases, does not know how to tell Erica that she loves her and wants her to stay. Erica is too bound by convention to see the relationship through:
The idea of telling her parents she was staying in Paris to live in a squat with a lover was unthinkable, the idea of telling them it was a woman laughable. […] She knew she could not live how Laure and her friends lived, at the edges, of things, even in Paris. Their bars raided, their friends beaten. She didn’t want to exist like that. She wanted to get married, to have children. She wanted to write novels, but she was not Gertrude Stein or Virginia Woolf, someone extraordinary or content to struggle with unhappiness. She wanted simple joy, simple happiness, simple love.
The novel then follows Laure and Erica’s separate, but often converging paths, right through to 2013. Beyond the two women, the supporting cast are equally well drawn, particularly Laure’s friend, Michel.
Millwood Hargrave is interested in the paths we choose and those from which we branch away. By choosing a more conventional life, what does Erica lose? How does one live a life filled with art, literature and intelligent conversation despite the banalities we all have to contend with? And, perhaps more conventionally, in terms of the realm of literature at least, does your first love ever truly leave you?
I haven’t loved a book as much as I loved Almost Life since The Essex Serpent ten years ago. The characters felt real, their flaws and dilemmas true to life and their trajectories convincing. The novel’s been compared to David Mitchell’s One Day (a book I did not enjoy), but, for me, it is everything I wanted but didn’t get from Lily King’s Heart the Lover. I savoured every word, thought about moving to Paris and becoming part of an artistic movement, and wondered how many women were going to read this and radically overhaul their lives. Almost Life is this year’s All Fours. Expect to see it everywhere and with good reason.
Thanks to Picador for the review copy.

















