
Issues & Policies
As a candidate for Mendocino County 3rd District Supervisor, I bring experience, leadership, strength, understanding, and a commitment to better our rural communities. I'm ready to address the most important issues facing our District 3. Learn more about my policies regarding Economic Development, Public Safety, Transparency, and Tribal Partnership below.
Economic Development
Public Safety
Transparency
Tribal Partnership
Economic Development That Strengthens Local Families & Small Businesses
Policy Focus
- Support locally owned businesses, family farms, ranchers, trades, and cooperatives—not just outside developers
- Streamline county permitting and licensing so small businesses can open, expand, and hire faster
- Prioritize living-wage job creation tied to local needs (healthcare, construction, forestry, fire mitigation, renewable energy)
- Expand workforce development partnerships with schools, adult education, unions, and employers
- Advocate for state and federal funding that targets rural economies, broadband access, and infrastructure
What This Looks Like in Practice
- Cutting red tape that delays small business growth
- Supporting job pipelines that keep young people working locally
- Investing in infrastructure that helps businesses operate and families thrive
Public Safety That Supports Law Enforcement & Expands Prevention and Recovery
Policy Focus
- Fully support law enforcement, fire services, and emergency responders with staffing, training, and equipment
- Strengthen prevention programs that reduce repeat offenses and improve community safety
- Expand mental health, substance-use recovery, and reentry services as part of public safety
- Improve coordination between law enforcement, health services, and community providers
- Prioritize emergency preparedness, disaster response, and wildfire resilience
What This Looks Like in Practice
- Safer communities through both enforcement and prevention
- Reduced strain on law enforcement by addressing root causes
- Stronger emergency response when disasters hit
Transparent, Accountable, and Accessible Government
Policy Focus
- Ensure open decision-making with clear explanations of votes and policies
- Improve public access to meetings, documents, and data (plain language, timely posting)
- Strengthen financial oversight and fiscal responsibility
- Encourage public participation before decisions are made—not after
- Hold county leadership accountable for outcomes, not just intentions
What This Looks Like in Practice
- No back-room decisions
- Clear communication about how tax dollars are spent
- A Board of Supervisors that listens and responds to community concerns
True Partnership With Tribal Governments
Policy Focus
- Honor government-to-government relationships with Tribal nations
- Ensure early and meaningful Tribal consultation on county decisions
- Collaborate on housing, public safety, health, environmental stewardship, and economic development
- Respect Tribal sovereignty while building shared solutions
- Pursue joint funding opportunities that benefit Tribal and non-Tribal communities alike
What This Looks Like in Practice
- Tribes at the table as partners—not an afterthought
- Policies that reflect shared responsibility and mutual respect
- Stronger outcomes for the entire county through collaboration
My Goals: How I'll Get It Done
Living in a rural community means we don’t wait for someone else to fix things — we roll up our sleeves.
That’s how we turn community voice into real progress.
Housing
Substance Use Disorder & Recovery
Jobs, Trades & Workforce
Higher Education
Tribal Partnerships
My Approach
My Positions On Wildfire Preparedness
Below, are my answers to the Mendocino County FireSafe Council's Board of Supervisor Candidate Questionnaire.
To view each of the candidate's answers to the questionnaire, please click HERE.
Question 1: In 2022, Mendocino County voters approved the Measure P sales tax. Prior to putting that measure on the ballot, the Board of Supervisors unanimously adopted Resolution BOS 22-159, stating their intent “to use any new revenues from the proposed sales tax to fund fire protection and prevention, with 90% of the new revenue to be spent on direct aid to those agencies providing direct fire protection services and 10% to assist in fire prevention, resiliency and readiness efforts.” BOS 22-159 also adopted a specific formula for allocating those funds, developed by the Mendocino County Association of Fire Districts. Are you committed to allocating 100% of Measure P sales tax revenues in the specific manner described in Resolution BOS 22-159? If not, please explain why not, and explain what alternate allocations you would support for the use of those funds.
View My Answer
Yes. I support allocating Measure P funds in the manner outlined in BOS Resolution 22-159. The intent of Measure P was clearly communicated to voters to strengthen fire protection and prevention across Mendocino County. When the public approves a measure with a specific purpose, it is important that the County follow through on that commitment.
Direct funding to fire agencies is essential to maintaining staffing, equipment, training, and emergency readiness. I also support the portion dedicated to prevention and resiliency efforts, because investing in prevention ultimately protects lives, property, and public resources. As Supervisor, I would support maintaining transparency and accountability in how those funds are distributed and ensure that local fire agencies continue to have a strong voice in how those resources are used.
Question 2: Measure P sunsets in 2033. Do you support efforts to renew the 1⁄4 cent sales tax for fire protection and prevention?
View My Answer
Yes, I would support efforts to renew the sales tax for fire protection and prevention. Wildfire risk is an ongoing reality in Mendocino County, and our communities rely on strong fire protection and prevention systems. Stable and predictable funding is essential for fire agencies to plan, recruit personnel, maintain equipment, and invest in mitigation.
At the same time, I believe it is important to clearly communicate to voters how the funds are being used and the impact they are having in our communities. Maintaining public trust will be critical to the long-term sustainability of any funding measure.
Question 3: In addition to Measure P, local fire agencies are granted County support from a mix of discretionary sources including:
-Measure D/E (TOT) - 10% transient occupancy tax on private campgrounds and RV sites
-Proposition 172 - 6.62% of Prop 172 revenues
-Ambulance support funding - $198,000 a year for Anderson Valley, Laytonville and Covelo ambulance services.
Are you committed to maintaining these funding sources in their present format as listed above? If not, please describe what modifications to these current funding sources you would support.
View My Answer
Yes, I support maintaining these funding sources in their current form. Emergency response services are foundational public safety functions, and rural areas like Anderson Valley, Laytonville, and Covelo rely heavily on these funding streams to maintain ambulance coverage and fire protection. At the same time, we have to acknowledge that current funding levels are not fully meeting the needs of our communities. Many of our fire and ambulance services continue to operate with limited resources, staffing challenges, and increasing demand.
Because of that, I believe we should not only maintain these funding sources but also look at ways to
Question 4: Funding for many of Mendocino County’s fire agencies still relies on a patchwork of sources, including the departments’ own barbecues, pancake breakfasts, etc. and hundreds of volunteer hours. This is not only inadequate for current demands but is also becoming unsustainable as volunteers are less available, prices continue to rise, and demand for services increases. How do you view your role as a Supervisor in securing sufficient, sustainable and reliable funding for local emergency-response services? What are your ideas about the process we should use to get there, and where would you start?
View My Answer
Our fire agencies should not have to rely on pancake breakfasts and volunteer fundraising to maintain critical emergency services. Volunteerism is a proud tradition in rural communities, but it cannot replace stable public funding for life-saving services. As Supervisor, my role would be to:
- Advocate for stable county funding streams
- Support state and federal grant opportunities
- Work collaboratively with fire districts to identify long-term funding solutions
- Prioritize infrastructure improvements that support emergency response
We need a coordinated approach that strengthens the entire emergency response system, from fire districts to dispatch to ambulance services.
Question 5: Do you support maintaining the Teeter Plan in its current form? If not, what modifications would you support?
View My Answer
I support maintaining the Teeter Plan because it provides critical stability for our local agencies, especially fire districts, schools, and special districts that rely on predictable property tax revenue to operate. At the same time, I don’t think it should remain static. The audits and current financial challenges make it clear that we need to take a closer look at how it’s functioning and whether adjustments are needed to ensure it remains sustainable for the County.
I would support evaluating a few key areas. First, strengthening delinquent tax collection practices to reduce the County’s exposure and improve recovery timelines. Second, ensuring we have clear and transparent tracking and reporting, so the Board and the public understand the level of risk and outstanding liabilities. And third, reviewing whether the reserve levels and risk thresholds tied to the Teeter Plan are adequate given current conditions.
I would also want to make sure that any changes do not unintentionally destabilize the very agencies that rely on the program, particularly our rural fire districts. Overall, I support maintaining the Teeter Plan, but with a focus on strong oversight, improved collection, and long-term sustainability.
Question 6: Emergency dispatch for local fire agency response in 2024 was roughly 9.5% fire-related (veg, structure, vehicle and other fires), 16.9% hazard or public service related (haz-mat and public assistance) and 73.6% medical related (medical and traffic collision). Because of recent large-scale wildfires, the public has more awareness surrounding the need to support fire prevention and suppression. EMS has a far lower profile (until you are the one who needs it) and consequently it gets less public attention and support, even though it makes up most of the call volume and is a primary service that fire agencies provide. Do you agree that public agency provision of EMS is critical in our County, and must receive sufficient funding to ensure both quality and availability? If not, please explain. How do you view your role as Supervisor in improving our prehospital care system?
View My Answer
Yes, I agree that public agency provision of EMS is critical and must be sufficiently funded. In many rural communities, EMS services are the backbone of emergency medical care, particularly where hospitals are far away. Fire agencies are often the first and fastest responders.
As Supervisor, I would focus on:
- Ensuring sustainable funding for ambulance services
- Supporting collaboration between fire districts, ambulance providers, and the County
- Improving coordination of emergency response systems
- Advocating for rural EMS funding at the state level
Improving prehospital care ultimately saves lives, and it should remain a core priority for county government.
Question 7: Successfully adapting to our wildfire-adapted environment will take a huge effort, including retrofitting homes to make them more fire-resistant, redesigning landscaping to remove hazards, implementing consistent fuel-management programs around population centers, improving key ingress and egress routes, implementing more prescribed burning, developing additional emergency fire suppression water resources, enforcing abatement where landowners are putting their neighbors at risk, developing community safety plans and networks, ensuring that new development is designed to be fire safe, and developing multiple ingress and egress options throughout the county.What do you see as the County’s role in making these necessary changes happen, and what steps would you advocate taking to accelerate the process?
View My Answer
Wildfire is part of our reality in Mendocino County, and addressing it requires a coordinated, long-term approach. I see the County’s role as a convener and partner, aligning efforts, removing barriers, and helping bring resources into our communities. Key priorities include strengthening fuel management and defensible space programs, including supporting prescribed and cultural burning in partnership with Tribal communities. We must also improve infrastructure by addressing road conditions and identifying safe, reliable ingress and egress routes, particularly in our rural areas.
The County should expand support for home hardening and community preparedness by helping residents access funding and technical assistance. At the same time, we need fair and consistent enforcement where properties create hazards, paired with education and support. Finally, we must continue to pursue state and federal funding and strengthen partnerships to scale these efforts. Addressing wildfire risk requires coordination, accountability, and sustained investment, and I am committed to ensuring the County plays an active and effective role in protecting our communities.
Question 8: The risks of wildfire to people and property continue to escalate in part due to zoning regulations that allow building in high and very high fire severity zones areas without requiring additional fire safe building and landscaping techniques.Do you believe that the County should implement changes to its zoning and building codes to help reduce that risk? Also, would you support or oppose new development in areas lacking multiple options for ingress and egress?
View My Answer
Wildfire is part of our reality in Mendocino County, and addressing it requires a coordinated, long-term approach. I see the County’s role as a convener and partner, aligning efforts, removing barriers, and helping bring resources into our communities. Key priorities include strengthening fuel management and defensible space programs, including supporting prescribed and cultural burning in partnership with Tribal communities. We must also improve infrastructure by addressing road conditions and identifying safe, reliable ingress and egress routes, particularly in our rural areas.
The County should expand support for home hardening and community preparedness by helping residents access funding and technical assistance. At the same time, we need fair and consistent enforcement where properties create hazards, paired with education and support. Finally, we must continue to pursue state and federal funding and strengthen partnerships to scale these efforts. Addressing wildfire risk requires coordination, accountability, and sustained investment, and I am committed to ensuring the County plays an active and effective role in protecting our communities.
Question 9: Relative to the overall priorities in the County that you will address, how do you rank improved wildfire prevention and mitigation efforts, i.e., is it critical, high, medium or low priority? Is it in your top five concerns?
View My Answer
Wildfire prevention and mitigation is a high priority and absolutely within my top concerns for Mendocino County. Our communities have experienced firsthand the devastating impacts of wildfire, and the risks continue to grow. Because of that, prevention, preparedness, and long-term resilience must remain central to how we plan, invest, and make decisions at the County level. This includes strengthening fuel reduction efforts, supporting home hardening and defensible space, improving emergency access and evacuation routes, and expanding partnership. Investing in mitigation today is not optional, it is essential to protecting lives, property, and the long-term sustainability of our communities.
Question 10: Are you familiar with the programs provided by the Mendocino County Fire Safe Council (e.g., maintaining and coordinating a countywide map of wildfire mitigation projects, funding local mitigation projects, obtaining and managing fuel-reduction grant projects, organizing neighborhood fire-safe groups, educating the public about home-hardening, defensible space and retrofitting, conducting home assessments, providing free community chipper days, providing defensible space assistance for seniors and persons with physical restrictions, and providing reflective address signs)? What do you think the County’s role should be in partnering on or otherwise supporting those efforts?
View My Answer
Yes, I am familiar with the work of the Mendocino County Fire Safe Council and the critical role they play in wildfire prevention and community preparedness across our county. Programs like defensible space assistance, home assessments, fuel reduction projects, neighborhood fire-safe groups, and support for seniors and vulnerable residents are essential to reducing risk and strengthening community resilience. I believe the County’s role is to be a strong partner in this work by:
- Supporting and expanding these programs
- Helping secure and align state and federal funding
- Improving coordination across agencies, fire districts, and Tribal partners
- Promoting public education and increasing community participation
The County should also work to remove barriers that slow down implementation and ensure these resources are reaching rural and high-risk communities. These efforts are not optional, they are critical to building a culture of preparedness and protecting lives, homes, and our communities.
Question 11: In general, do you support the “Mendocino County Strategic Plan 2022-2027” adopted in 2022? If not, what aspects of it would you change?
View My Answer
In general, I support the Mendocino County Strategic Plan 2022–2027 as a framework for setting priorities and guiding long-term planning. It reflects many of the core issues our communities are facing, including infrastructure, workforce challenges, and public safety. At the same time, a strategic plan is only as effective as its implementation. I believe there is an opportunity to strengthen accountability, timelines, and measurable outcomes to ensure the plan translates into real progress on the ground.
Regarding item IV.B, ensuring access to rural fire protection and emergency medical services is critical. In a county as large and rural as Mendocino, access to reliable fire and EMS services can be the difference between life and loss. I support prioritizing:
- Sustainable and increased funding for rural fire and EMS services
- Recruitment and retention of firefighters, EMTs, and volunteers
- Improved coordination between fire districts, the County, and regional partners
- Investments in infrastructure, including roads and emergency access
- Support for training, equipment, and local capacity
We also need to recognize that many rural areas, including communities like Covelo and Laytonville, face unique challenges that require targeted solutions. Ensuring access to fire protection and EMS is not just a goal, it is a fundamental responsibility, and I am committed to advancing that work.
Question 12: In particular, relative to item IV.B in the plan, “Ensure access to rural fire protection and emergency medical services,” do you….
- Support recruitment efforts of firefighters for paid and volunteer fire departments. Do you support this and how do you see your role as a Supervisor in supporting recruitment and retention efforts?
- Work with the Mendocino County Fire Safe Council to develop Neighborhood Fire Safe Councils in communities throughout the County. Do you support this and how do you see your role as a Supervisor in helping develop and activate NFSCs and their projects?
- Seek funding to increase the number of available ambulances with advanced life support features. Do you support this and how do you see your role in helping increase advanced life support services?
- If elected, your tenure will likely coincide with an update to the Mendocino County Strategic Plan. How do you see your role as it relates to development of the Plan, in particular updates to section IV.B.?
View My Answer
- Yes, I strongly support recruitment and retention efforts for both paid and volunteer fire departments. Our fire services are stretched thin, especially in rural areas, and sustaining this workforce is critical to public safety. As a Supervisor, I would support efforts to improve recruitment by addressing barriers such as workforce housing, training access, and funding stability. Retention also requires supporting fair compensation where possible, investing in equipment and resources, and ensuring volunteers feel valued and supported.
- Yes, I support working with the Mendocino County Fire Safe Council to expand and strengthen Neighborhood Fire Safe Councils. These local groups are essential for building community-level preparedness and reducing wildfire risk. As a Supervisor, I would help promote these efforts, support coordination across agencies, and work to connect NFSCs with funding opportunities, technical assistance, and County resources to help implement projects effectively.
- Yes, I support seeking funding to expand access to advanced life support services. In many parts of Mendocino County, especially rural communities, timely access to emergency medical care is limited. As a Supervisor, I would advocate for increased funding, support partnerships with local providers, and work to ensure that resources are distributed in a way that improves response times and outcomes across the county.
- As a Supervisor, I would see my role as helping ensure the Strategic Plan reflects the real needs of our communities and leads to measurable results. In updating Section IV.B, I would prioritize strengthening rural fire protection and EMS through clear goals, accountability, and sustainable funding strategies. I would also emphasize coordination with fire districts, Tribal partners, and community organizations to ensure solutions are practical, inclusive, and effective.
Additional Questionnaires
Planned
Parenthood
SEIU
Local 1021
Ukiah
Daily Journal
Upcoming Candidate Forums
Keep up to date and make an informed choice. This is your opportunity to meet, and learn more, about the candidates running for Mendocino County District 3 Supervisor. Each candidate will present their platforms and answer prepared and audience questions.

Third District
Board of Supervisors
Candidates Forum
Harwood Hall, Laytonville
Wednesday, April 29th
5:30PM
This forum will provide equal time for each candidate's brief position statements, as well as a Q&A with District Three area residents.

Third District
Board of Supervisors
Candidates Forum
Round Valley Commons, Covelo
Saturday, May 2nd
3PM
Join us at the Candidate Forum. Come meet the candidates and discuss the issues that matter most to our community.

