What is the difference between the = and := operators, and what are the use cases for them? They both seem to be for an assignment?
8 Answers 8
In Go, := is for declaration + assignment, whereas = is for assignment only.
For example, var foo int = 10 is the same as foo := 10.
= as opposed to :=? Should you just always use :=?:= to assign to a variable that has already been declared, unless you are assigning to multiple variables at once, and at least one of those variables is new.int is not required, var foo = 10 is the same as foo := 10TLDR:
- Declare a variable, use:
:=. - Change a variable’s value, use:
=.
There are some rules and the TLDR is not always true.
As others have explained already, := is for both declaration, assignment, and also for redeclaration; and it guesses (infers) the variable's type automatically.
For example, foo := 32 is a short-hand form of:
var foo int
foo = 32
// OR:
var foo int = 32
// OR:
var foo = 32
/ Here are the rules: /
★ 1st Rule:
You can't use := outside of funcs. It's because, outside a func, a statement should start with a keyword.
// no keywords below, illegal.
illegal := 42
// `var` keyword makes this statement legal.
var legal = 42
func foo() {
alsoLegal := 42
// reason: it's in a func scope.
}
★ 2nd Rule:
You can't use them twice (in the same scope):
legal := 42
legal := 42 // <-- error
Because, := introduces "a new variable", hence using it twice does not redeclare a second variable, so it's illegal.
★ 3rd Rule:
You can use them for multi-variable declarations and assignments:
foo, bar := 42, 314
jazz, bazz := 22, 7
★ 4th Rule (Redeclaration):
You can use them twice in "multi-variable" declarations, if one of the variables is new:
foo, bar := someFunc()
foo, jazz := someFunc() // <-- jazz is new
baz, foo := someFunc() // <-- baz is new
This is legal, because, you're not declaring all the variables, you're just reassigning new values to the existing variables, and declaring new variables at the same time. This is called redeclaration.
★ 5th Rule:
You can use the short declaration to declare a variable in a newer scope even if that variable is already declared with the same name before:
var foo int = 34
func some() {
// because foo here is scoped to some func
foo := 42 // <-- legal
foo = 314 // <-- legal
}
Here, foo := 42 is legal, because, it declares foo in some() func's scope. foo = 314 is legal, because, it just assigns a new value to foo.
★ 6th Rule:
You can declare the same name in short statement blocks like: if, for, switch:
foo := 42
if foo := someFunc(); foo == 314 {
// foo is scoped to 314 here
// ...
}
// foo is still 42 here
Because, foo in if foo := ..., only belongs to that if clause and it's in a different scope.
References:
Comments
Only = is the assignment operator.
:= is a part of the syntax of the short variable declaration clause.
👉 There are some rules though. See this other answer for more details.
:= is listed as an operator here golang.org/ref/spec#Operators_and_punctuation, so I'm not sure I agree that ":= is actually not an operator":= is a short-hand for declaration.
a := 10
b := "gopher"
a will be declared as an int and initialized with value 10 where as b will be declared as a string and initialized with value gopher.
Their equivalents using = would be
var a = 10
var b = "gopher"
= is assignment operator. It is used the same way you would use it in any other language.
You can omit the type when you declare the variable and an initializer is present (http://tour.golang.org/#11).
= is only for comparison and := is for assignment...:= declares and assigns, = just assigns
It's useful when you don't want to fill up your code with type or struct declarations.
// Usage with =
var i int
var U, V, W float64
var k = 0
var x, y float32 = -1, -2
// Usage with :=
i, j := 0, 10
f := func() int { return 7 }
ch := make(chan int)
Comments
from the reference doc : (tour.golang.org)
Inside a function, the := short assignment statement can be used in place of a var declaration with implicit type.
Outside a function, every construct begins with a keyword (var, func, and so on) and the := construct is not available.
x := uint32(123)works for example. It must be obvious for most people but I had to think a few minutes ;-)