Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Does a machine-parsable alternative to lsusb -v exist?

+6
−0

github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc/discussions/666#discussioncomment-14470622, and its immediate context, explain that lsusb does not appear to provide machine-parsable output, and that the available infrastructure to render its output machine-parsable does not provide feature-parity with lsusb.

Although I comprehend askubuntu.com/a/725887, I desire a similarly abstracted alternative to lsusb -v, so that I do not need to reinvent it:

  1. #!/usr/bin/env sh
    lsusb -v | jc --lsusb | yq -P
    
  2. - bus: "001"
      device: "001"
      id: 1d6b:0002
      description: Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
      device_descriptor:
        bLength:
          value: "18"
    
History

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »