About the challenge

Inspired by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's essay Machines of Loving Grace, we're asking: what does it look like to build AI that actually makes the world better?

This isn't a vibe-coding competition. We're looking for teams who pick a real problem, build something that genuinely helps real people, and think seriously about what could go wrong. Whether you're tackling health equity, civic participation, economic access, or something entirely your own — if it matters, build it.

When & Where: April 2026 · UCLA Grand Ackerman Ballroom

Who: Open to all undergraduate students across participating institutions.

 

Prizes: $1,500 cash + $3,000 in Anthropic API credits up for grabs.

Requirements

What to Submit

All submissions must include:

  1. A working prototype — your project must demonstrate core functionality. Mockups-only will not be considered for top prizes.
  2. A project description covering:
    • What problem you're solving and who it's for
    • How your solution works (technical overview)
    • What could go wrong, and what safeguards you've built in
    • How your project empowers rather than replaces people
    • Any ethical considerations made when building this project
  3. A link to your public GitHub repository

Submissions are due by the posted deadline on the day of the event. Late submissions will not be accepted.

Hackathon Sponsors

Prizes

$1,499+ in prizes
+ other prizes
1st Overall
$750 in cash
1 winner

$750 cash + $1,500 in API credits

2nd Overall
$499 in cash
1 winner

$500 cash + $1,000 in API credits

3rd Overall
$250 in cash
1 winner

$250 cash + $500 in API credits

Honorable Mention: Most Creative Use of Claude
1 winner

$500 in API Credits

Honorable Mention: Most Impact
1 winner

$500 in API Credits

Devpost Achievements

Submitting to this hackathon could earn you:

Judges

Kristie Son

Kristie Son
TikTok

Thomas Norell

Thomas Norell
Anthropic

Saty Raghavachary

Saty Raghavachary
USC Professor

Pranav Nambiar

Pranav Nambiar
Qualcomm

Rian Corcino

Rian Corcino
Azyenberg

Jerry L

Jerry L
MS CS

Pranit Agrawal

Pranit Agrawal
Pixley AI (F25)

Parth Patel

Parth Patel
AfterQuery

Kayla Kavanaugh

Kayla Kavanaugh
Afore Capitol

Johnathan Healy

Johnathan Healy
Cathay Innovation

Kaitlyn Chu

Kaitlyn Chu
Apple

Cordell Yee

Cordell Yee
Superculture

Refaeli Ma

Refaeli Ma
Verizon

Judging Criteria

  • Impact Potential
    Real-world value and social relevance Does your project address a problem that actually matters? Judges will be looking at who this helps, how meaningfully it helps them, and whether the solution could realistically reach the people who need it.
  • Technical Execution
    Quality of build and Claude API integration How well is your project built, and how thoughtfully is Claude being used? This isn't just about complexity — it's about whether Claude is core to what makes your project work, not just bolted on.
  • Ethical Alignment
    Responsible AI use and awareness of risks Did your team think critically about what could go wrong? Judges want to see that you've considered potential harms, biases, or misuse — and that you've made intentional design choices to address them.
  • Presentation
    Clarity, polish, and how well you communicate your idea Can you explain what you built, why it matters, and how it works — clearly and concisely? A strong presentation tells a story: the problem, your solution, and a live demo that brings it to life.

Questions? Email the hackathon manager

Tell your friends

Hackathon sponsors

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.