Top.Mail.Ru
? ?
The Poet and Photographer [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
sir_dave

[ website | my poetry and photography ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Hosea 5:9 [Nov. 9th, 2016|02:56 am]
sir_dave
Among the tribes of Israel I proclaim what is certain.
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

David Limbaugh [May. 4th, 2016|06:25 pm]
sir_dave
"In an odd way I’m relieved, for now. Part of the ongoing frustration is realizing how out of phase I am with the majority, but it has spoken."
~ David Limbaugh
LinkLeave a comment

IN MEMORY OF MY FATHER [Jan. 12th, 2016|10:55 pm]
sir_dave
John Albert Weston, 1919-2016.

DANIEL
You asked, “How many men were in the fire?”
Beneath the counterpane my fingers flick,
and proudly I announce, as if a trick,
that three young men had caused the king his ire.
You smiled and said, there were not three but four;
and like the ancient king, I stared in shock.
You chose belief whilst others chose to mock,
and so, the word went blazing to the core.
The handmade rug you laboured at so long
was special, in a way no words could tell;
and when I went to sleep, I knew full well
that daddy cared to teach me right from wrong.
You read the bible laid upon your knee,
and then, there were not two inside, but three.
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

OBITUARY: JOHN ALBERT WESTON, my father. [Jan. 12th, 2016|10:37 pm]
sir_dave
('Knight' is my pen name; I was born David John Weston.)

John Albert Weston was my father. He was already 40 when I was born. My family never do anything in a hurry - his own father, Josiah, had been 55 when John was born.

Today dad died aged 96. He had been claiming he might die any time since he was 50, but that was just because he said what he felt and he meant what he said, more than anybody else I have ever met. Honesty, as he saw it, was the first of virtues, and his version was to say just what he thought. So if he felt like he was dying, he said so.

Always a conscientious man, he made elaborate plans for the family’s well-being if he died. Though he was ten years older than my mother, she eventually rounded on him and asked him what made him so sure that he would be going first? In 1997, she led the way, and now he has followed her 19 years later.

His home for the last three decades was the farmhouse his own father bought to give him his own farm, long before he was old enough to work it. But dad, who was brought up in another farm which neighboured a railway line, chose to work on the railway instead. He briefly helped in the gardens of a stately home and for a while in the great depression he followed a threshing machine to seek day labour when the railway had no job for him; otherwise he worked on the railways all his working life.

How typical of dad to do one thing and stick at it. He got one job and did the best at it he could, taking great pride in every aspect of his work as a driver (US:engineer), earning the respect and admiration of his colleagues. But he also limited his advancement by choosing to spend time with his family. He married one woman and stuck to her, and thus lived a life totally at odds with the kind of world we are now living in, in which nothing is permanent.

Dad always seemed to me to be permanent. He didn’t seem to be the dying kind. Death didn’t run in the family. His own father had died taking the cows to market (on foot and alone), aged 84; his mother lived into her nineties. At 93, when I last saw him, dad’s mind was every bit as sharp as it had ever been; far too capable for what life had offered him.

In all my life I have never known a man who would so greatly have benefited from an education. His hopes ended one place short of getting into the local grammar school. Why is a mystery which will now never be cleared up; he should have walked in.

Not wishing to be a burden to his elderly parents, he began work as soon as possible. Rather than resent not having had an education, he made sure that my sister and I were always aware of its primary importance, and did everything in his power to ensure that the local school was as good as it could be.

As a boy he attended the Anglican church on top of the hill which towered over the surrounding landscape, where he was baptised. As a young man he was confirmed, and as he later told me, he really meant it, though he had his doubts about everyone else. Dad really meant everything he ever said or did, and no-one was ever in any doubt about that.

As a married man he attended the Methodist church in the town where he lived with my mother, because that was where her family went, but the differences didn’t matter as much to him as the God who he worshipped. He had no pretensions to singing the hymns well, but genuinely meant it when he said what mattered was to make a joyful noise.

One of his greatest achievements, from my point of view, was buying the home we were brought up in. Dad understood the opportunity when it came up and went down to the estate agents at 6 a.m. armed with a flask of tea to keep him warm. Nobody was going to beat him to the counter and pay for that house. So we lived like kings, by English standards, in a house with two rooms we never found any use for until my grandmother lived with us, had a choice of dining and living rooms, a big bedroom each, a decent garden on one side, a yard at the back and what seemed like a prairie at the other side.

I have lived a very strange life and this must often had bothered dad. When mother was dying, I was heartbroken that she would die without seeing me reach my goals. The Lord told me that they never mattered at all to her; she only ever wanted me to try the best that I could. Today I found out from my sister that dad’s verdict on my new life was “I am glad that David has found his place in the world”. Only now do I understand. Dad got one job and stuck at it and had one wife and stayed with her. Finally I have my feet set on the ground and I fit. I think that was all that he ever wanted, though I never realised it until he was dead.

Well then, if he was happy that I had done all that he wanted to please him, and my mother only ever asked that I try my best, why do I have to do everything the very best that it can ever be done? Why don’t I settle for anything less? Why don’t I set achievable targets and be glad with them? Maybe because dad always tried to do his work the very best it could be done and didn’t really understand not trying to do so. I shall now never know exactly why, but he may well have had this in mind:
“Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for human masters, since you know that you will receive an inheritance from the Lord as a reward.” (Colossians 3:23-4).
That was how he did his job.

If I have dreamed bigger dreams, then that is because I got the education he never had. But perhaps in truth there is no bigger dream than to do an honest day’s work, be faithful to your wife, tell the truth, and die without regrets. All other things will pass; Dad did all of those things.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

EIGHT WORDS [Jan. 8th, 2016|08:50 pm]
sir_dave
Political Correctness is the Liberal version of McCarthyism.

Fourteen words:
Is Political Correctness just a nuisance? No, it is the Liberal version of McCarthyism.

A bit more:
Political Correctness is a free pass to shout down, boycott or exclude anyone who mentions a 'taboo' subject, before finding out what they have to say in detail. As a result it silences, embitters the silenced and causes a false view of people's true feelings to be observed.

Whoever uses Political Correctness to shout another person down need never examine their opponents arguments, since they remain unheard. Consequently the 'down shouter' need never examine their own arguments, either. Thus politically correct beliefs and attitudes which could not survive exposure to thoughtful inquiry, may linger for years or decades despite their objective falsity.

The argument which may not be voiced is still believed by those who may not speak it, and neither understood nor refuted by those who do not let it be heard. This is neither good, nor principled, nor wise. Silencing people is just forcing opinions, right or wrong, out of the light in which they can be examined.

How long did McCarthyism last? Was that too long or too short?

How long has Political Correctness lasted? If that is longer than McCarthyism, then does that make it a more or a less vile imposition upon a tolerant people than McCarthyism?

Politically Correct accusations of intolerance are not a solution to the things called intolerant, because Political Correctness is intolerance as a way of life. Those accused by the Politically Correct may prove to be entirely innocent once they are heard. But they may never be heard; and that is why the only solution to intolerance as a way of life (PC) is to call it what it is - evil.
Link5 comments|Leave a comment

Me. Here? [Nov. 24th, 2015|12:47 pm]
sir_dave
So, if I hung around here again, would anyone be the least bit interested?

These days my life has only two topics:

- How to create a 'multi social' operating system for the internet. Think Bill Gates met Mark Zuckerberg and they achieved synergy.

- Dismantling the entirely false, but honestly believed, idea that the KJV is exactly the way God intended.

As regards the latter, I spent a year in a church where the idea is proposed with total honesty, and I liked almost everyone there, but as soon as you examine the detail of the theory, it turns out to be 100% untrue. Note, that doesn't mean I am advocating any other bible as being perfect. They all have flaws - and post Tyndale, every one of them has had a DELIBERATE flaw, the biggest and most crippling flaw they could have had without actually defaming God Himself.

But the failures of one bible do not vindicate the others, and one can dismantle the 'KJV only' view faster than it can be preached (I've quite literally done so). The only problem with this is that most of those who hold that view never investigate the facts for themselves and are content to repeat the view they first liked hearing. Just the same as most others do --- but in this case, a total falsification is possible for those who are actually prepared to consider listening to it.

(Falsification: The act of disproving a proposition, hypothesis, or theory.)
Link12 comments|Leave a comment

Change of everything [Mar. 28th, 2013|09:33 pm]
sir_dave
My dear friends,

I recently married Lisa Cahn of Oviedo, Florida. We are now living together in Orlando. So I have changed a continent, changed a language (they do NOT speak a language I understand here!), changed marital status, and am also changing emails. As a result the email which receives notifications from LJ will become less and less important to me and will get less and less attention paid to it.

Yes, for some time now I've only been posting on Facebook. LJ was a better place to make friends and develop depth to a friendship, but let's face it, almost everyone who can click a mouse is now on Facebook. I wish it were the other way round. But if you still want to keep in touch with me, please respond to this post while I am still taking notice of my old email address and I will let you know how and where I can keep in touch with you, depending on what services you are still using.

LJ was a great experience, and I often miss people I first met here. LJ probably misses quite a lot of them, too. But in the eternally chaging world of the internet, nothing lasts.

Except MSP.

And that's the secret I may yet return to share.

God bless you all :)
Link16 comments|Leave a comment

Livejournal email addresses. [Dec. 17th, 2012|05:40 pm]
sir_dave
Is there still such a thing as a livejournal.com email address? If there is, I might be able to add something to the LJ experience :D I've looked all over the site and I can't find any reference to them. I sent an email to the one person I know who had one, but it got returned. Can anybody help?
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

Calendars for 2011 [Dec. 4th, 2010|03:45 pm]
sir_dave
I've just completed three new calendars for 2011 (rather late, I know). Links below. These will take you to lulu.com where you can see the full content of each - click on 'preview' under the cover to see the other pictures.



Sunset and Skies calendar 2011


God's Creatures calendar 2011



Beautiful Britain calendar 2011


I'm working on turning them all into slide shows on my website, but that takes time.

We are currently under about 18 inches of snow here; I have never seen anything like it since 1986, perhaps not even then. Just the other day we had negative Fahernheit temperatures in this county - I've never even heard of that before in Britain!

Sadly I am so badly snowed in that pictures are proving difficult to get. Where you can put your feet down at all, the footing is treacherous.
LinkLeave a comment

An affront to democracy and a waste of our money [Nov. 24th, 2010|12:52 pm]
sir_dave
The Eu has found only 36% of Britons think our country has benefitted from being in the EU, so they have set up a website to tell us what they are doing for us. This allows 'enquiries', so I have sent mine. If you agree with this feel free to send the same yourself. Here's the content and here is how:

========================

When Britain entered the EU, we were denied a vote.

Later we were given one, but were knowingly lied to by our politicians. They knew this would be a political union, yet told us the opposite. We would be released from our consent if we had recourse to a court of law, since we were misled about the terms.

European countries have been subject to the most systematic abuse of democracy in the history of man:

- We were first given votes, assuming we would comply when told to do so by our leaders.

- After enough of these votes, we saw we were being led ever further into something we did not want.

- Some countries then voted against EU proposals.

- Then the EU decided we must be asked the same question again, until we gave the right answers. This refusal to abide by the will of the people is inexcusable. A vote which must be taken until the right answer is given is not a vote but an ultimatum.

- Finally voters refused EU proposals so often the EU decided we must be denied votes on any issues we might vote against.

- The voters of each country were then given a completely different account of the content of EU treaties, being told in each country whatever was most palatable therein, whilst our neighbours were given a different story. We were told bare faced lies we KNEW were bare faced lies; yet we were supposed to accept this.

Now you have created a website at our expense to tell us what you are doing for us.

We know what you are doing for us.

You are implementing a pan national conspiracy of politicians against the people. This exists to allow politicians to do as they please, ruling over Europeans by edict without the opportunity of challenge.

Do not insult our intelligence as voters by pretending these things are untrue; they are a matter of record. Denying them only ensures you sink deeper in our contempt every day. An admission and an apology should be the first step to the renunciation of rule by edict and by ultimatum dressed as democracy.

========================

To send the EU a message, use this link:

Give them what they deserve

You then need to fill in a few details (name, email address etc.) and provide a subject and an 'enquiry' up to 2000 characters long. I entered as subject :

"An affront to democracy and a waste of our money"

The above message runs to just under 2000 characters, so there is little room to add to the above.

At least we have an opportunity to vent our feelings.
Link6 comments|Leave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]