Since we're approaching an equinox (which happens to be one of the eight festivals of the Wiccan year), it seems like an appropriate time to address an issue that occasionally bugs me in fanfic: the use of Wicca when one actually means Wiccan. Many fic writers have picked up the skewed usage based on original lines from the series, such as “Willow is a very powerful Wicca.”
For those who aren't familiar with the terms, Wicca is the name of the religion, while Wiccan is the name of the practitioner – the same as Christianity/Christian, Judaism/Jew, Islam/Muslim, etc. So saying that Willow is a very powerful Wicca is like saying someone is a very devout Christianity or an observant Judaism. Grammar-wise, it just doesn't work!
I'm not sure why the BtVS writers got their terminology so wrong. (That same question has been raised – without answer – in one of the essays in Jana Riess's book, What Would Buffy Do: The Vampire Slayer as Spiritual Guide.) The writing staff certainly seemed like hip folks who knew their way around modern culture, and it's hard to believe that someone related to the show didn't give them a heads-up about the error fairly early on.
So when I occasionally see fanfic writers who mistakenly use Wicca when they should use Wiccan, I'm a tad irritated but also sympathetic: I realize they are simply being canon-compliant and may not even realize their error. I'm hoping that, as writers and betas, we can stop inadvertently perpetuating the canonical error and instead choose to correct it. Doing so would benefit proper grammar and word usage, as well as show respect for others' spirituality by referring to their religion accurately.
Which brings up the issue: is canon sacrosanct when it is an ill-informed or mistaken reference? I'm interested in others' views on this.
Cross-posted on
riters_r_us
If you'd like to take a peek at what's involved, perhaps check the info portal for new contributors: http://fanlore.org/wiki/Fanlore:Portal. I know all the S/X authors are busy writing fic (yay!), but just in case one of you has some "spare" time...well, it would be a lovely public service! (And might give the guys a little "official" validation.)
Since his appearance in season 2, supposedly as a fill-in villain until Angel turned bad, Spike has become one of the most popular Buffy characters and one of the most frequently discussed in recent scholarship. This may be due to his many contradictions: Spike blurs boundaries between good and bad, "masculine" and "feminine," hetero- and homosexual, man and monster, comic and tragic, villain and hero. Spicer argues convincingly that "it is his very liminality -- the impossibility of consigning him to a predetermined gender category -- that empowers him in the Buffyverse, enabling him to navigate the complex gender inversions that mark a community oriented around a heroic, female Slayer."
I've enjoyed some of the other scholarly Buffy books I've read (two good ones are Jana Riess's What Would Buffy Do? The Vampire Slayer as Spiritual Guide and Rhonda Wilcox's Why Buffy Matters: The Art of Buffy the Vampire Slayer), and am curious to see what Jowett has to say from a feminist cultural studies view.
ETA: Wilcox title.
( Enter hereCollapse )
Special congratulations to the personable and talented
Thanks to two extensive road trips with my grandparents when I was young and many camping trips during the 30 years I was married, I've seen some wonderful things. [My ex may have his faults, but he did enable some great travel experiences for the kids and me.] I've also visited nearly all the provinces of Canada, but have never been to Mexico.
( See mapCollapse )
http://theflickcast.com/2010/03/16/buffy-swan-refuses-to-suck/
Some enjoyable readers' comments also.
There seems to be a certain amount of angst swirling around the LJ Buffyverse right now -- and not just in the fanfic itself, where most of us love it. ( I'm not entirely sure what's going on, but...Collapse )
Comments