Tag Archives: alarm

Jasper’s home alarm

by

1

When Theo, Kee, and Miriam flee the murderous Fishes, they take refuge in Jasper’s home for the night. They are awoken in the morning by Jasper’s sentry system.

ChildrenofMen_Jasper_alarm

A loud cacophonous alarm sounds, made up of what sounds like recorded dog barks, bells clanging, and someone banging a stick on a metal trash can lid. Jasper explains to everyone in the house that “It’s the alarm! Someone’s breaking in!”

They gather around a computer screen with large speakers on either side. The screen shows four video feeds labeled ROAD A, FOREST A, FRONT DOOR, and ROAD B. Labels reading MOTION DETECTED <> blink at the bottom of the ROAD A and ROAD B feeds, where we can see members of the Fishes removing the brush that hides the driveway to Jasper’s house.

The date overlays the upper right hand corner of the screen, 06-DEC-2027, 08:10:58.

Across the bottom is a control panel of white numbers and icons on red backgrounds.

  • A radio button control for the number of video feeds to be displayed. Though we are seeing the 4-up display, the icon does not appear to be different than the rest.
  • 16 enumerated icons, the purpose for which is unclear.
  • Video control icons for reverse, stop, play, and fast forward.
  • Three buttons with gray backgrounds and icons.
  • A wide button blinking MASTER ALARM

The scene cuts to Jasper’s rushing to the car outside the home, where none of the cacophony can be heard.

Similar to his car dashoard, it makes sense that Jasper has made this alarm himself. This might explain the clunky layout and somewhat inscrutable icons. (What do the numbers do? What about that flower on the gray background?)

The three jobs of an intruder alarm

Jasper’s alarm is OK. It certainly does the job of grabbing the household’s attention, which is the first job of an alarm, and does it without alerting the intruders, as we see in the shot outside the house.

It could do a bit better at the second job of an alarm, which is to inform the household of the nature of the problem. That they have to gather around the monitor takes precious time that could be used for making themselves safer. It could be improved by removing this requirement.

  • If Jasper had added more information to the audio alarm, even so basic as a prerecorded “Motion on the road! Motion on the road!” then they might not have needed to gather around the monitor at all.
  • If the relevant video feeds could be piped to wearable devices, phones, or their car, then they can fill in their understanding at the same time that they are taking steps to getting the hell out of there.
  • Having the artificial intelligence that we have in actual-world 2017 (much less speculative 2027), we know that narrow AI can process that video to have many more details in the broadcast message. “Motion on the road! I see three cars and at least a dozen armed men!”

There is arguably a third job of an advanced alarm, and this is to help the household understand the best course of action. This can be problematic when the confidence of the recommendation is low. But if the AI can confidently make a recommendation, it can use whatever actuators it has to help them along their way.

  • It could be informational, such as describing the best option. The audio alarm could encourage them to “Take the back road!” It could even alert the police (though in the world of Children of Men, Jasper would not trust them and they may be disinclined to care.)
  • The alarm could give some parameters and best-practice recommendations like, “You have 10 minutes to be in the car! Save only yourselves, carry nothing!”
  • It could keep updating the situation and the countdown so the household does not have to monitor it.
  • It can physically help as best it can, like remotely starting and positioning cars for them.

This can get conceptually tricky as the best course of action may be conditional, e.g. “If you can get to the car in 5 minutes, then escape is your best option, but if it takes longer or you have defenses, then securing the home and alerting the police is the better bet.” But that may be too much to process in the moment, and for a household that does not rehearse response scenarios, the simpler instruction may be safer.

Contact!

by

0

image04

Jack lands in a ruined stadium to do some repairs on a fallen drone. After he’s done, the drone takes a while to reboot, so while he waits, Jack’s mind drifts to the stadium and the memories he has of it.

Present information as it might be shared

Vika was in comms with Jack when she notices the alarm signal from the desktop interface. Her screen displays an all-caps red overlay reading ALERT, and a diamond overlaying the unidentified object careening toward him. She yells, “Contact! Left contact!” at Jack.

image02

As Jack hears Vika’s warning, he turns to look drawing his pistol reflexively as he crouches. While the weapon is loading he notices that the cause of the warning was just a small, not-so-hostile dog.

Although Vika yells about something coming from the left side, by looking at the screen you can kind of tell that it’s more to his back—his 6 or 7 o’ clock—than left. We’re seeing it with time to spare here, and the satellite image is very low-res, so we can cut her some slack. But given all the sensors at its command, the interface would ideally which way Jack is facing and which way the threat approaches, so she can convey correct and useful information quickly.

“Contact, at your 6, Jack!”

That’s much more precise and actionable for Jack.

image00

Don’t cover information

It might be useful to put the ALERT overlay somewhere other than on top of Jack, since it might obscure some useful information. Perhaps the “chrome” of the interface could turn red? Not as instantly readable for the audience, but if we’re designing for Vika…

Provide specifics

Another issue is that neither the satellite image nor the interface help Vika to identify what ends up being just a dog. Even when Jack manages to stay cool through the little scare jump, adding at least some information about the object would go a long way to make Vika and the situation less tense.

Jack’s encounter with the TET gives clear evidence that the TET has sophisticated computer vision, so the interface could help Vika a bit by “guessing” what any questionable object might be. It doesn’t need to be exact (and it probably couldn’t be with that kind of video feed) but the computer could give its educated guess just by analyzing the context, shape, and motion compared against things in the database. So instead of telling there is an 87% chance of being a dog or a 76% chance of being a fox, the interface could just predict unknown animal (see below).

recomp

Share off-screen information

Fast viewers saw the unknown object before the warning. During a split of a second while the object is entering the screen, it remains blue. So the computer does keep track of any movement, even if it’s not a threat. In that case the issue is that the computer seems to be tracking movement far beyond the visible area of the screen but it doesn’t let Vika know something’s coming from off-screen. The display doesn’t need to zoom out to reach the contact—that could distract Vika from following Jack—but at least it could show some kind of signal pointing at the incoming contact.

What of multiple contacts?

I’m cautious to talk about what ifs, since most of it is just guesswork—but bear with me. On the sequence the interface keeps track of just one contact, but how it would behave if there were more than one? If the computer does track of contacts beyond the camera display Vika is watching, then just marking them is not enough. If Vika needs to inform Jack on the number of contacts she’s getting on the screen, then you need some sort of overview. Pointing at the direction of the contact is useful, but it does mean you have to sweep all the screen to know how many of them are. But that can be easily fixed by adding a list of all the current contacts.

Show trending

Pausing the film a bit and looking closely, it seems that the only difference between all-is-fine and contact! with the dog is about a meter long. And what is more, by the time the interface triggers the warning the dog is really close to Jack. If that was feral dog and it was to attack him, the warning to Jack would come very late.

In such mission-critical monitoring, it’s not enough to show changes of state. Change the state subtly to indicate as things are trending—as in, this dog is likely to continue its intercept course and getting closer.

We got this

So to wrap up, the interface does a well enough job, but it could certainly benefit from some design changes. The issues are ones that any designer might have to face when working with a monitoring interface, so worth summarizing.

  • Share all the information that is at hand
  • Give the user the information in the form they might pass it along
  • Assign an easy-to-distinguish hierarchy: information, suspicion, warning
  • Provide best-guesses as to the nature of problems with as much specificity as you can
  • Provide unobtrusive but clear signals about the mode
  • Anticipate and show trending dangers

Good morning, Korben

by

3

5E-alarm_notext

Korben’s alarm clock is a transparent liquid-crystal display that juts out from a panel at the foot of his bed. When it goes off, it emits a high-pitched repetitive whine. To silence it, Korben must sit up and pinch it between his fingers.

There’’s some subtle, wicked effeciveness to that deactivation. Like a regular alarm clock, the tactic is to emit some annoying sound that persists until the sleeper can rouse themselves enough to turn off the alarm. The usual problem with this tactic is that the sleeper is stupefied in his half-awakeness. If he can sleepily stop the alarm and just go back to sleep, he’ll do it. This clock dissuades sleepy flailing with its sharp-ish corners. After just a few times trying to do that and failing, the scratches on his hand will teach him. Even if the motion is memorized, the sleeper has to wake enough to target it properly and execute the simple but precise input.

The display itself shows the time in astronomical format, i.e. “02:00”, the date (Director Luc Besson‘s birthday), “18 MAR 2263″, and a temperature, 27.5° C.” Since this is quite warm, I presume this is the temperature outside.

fifthelement-fish

Once Korben cancels the alarm, his apartment comes to life. Heavy-beat music begins to play and lights automatically illuminate near the fake-fish tank above the stove and in his cigarette dispenser.

fifthelement-cigs

All these signals combine to make it difficult for sleepy Korben to stay in bed past when awake Korben knows he should be up and moving.

Portable brainwave detector

by

0

Barbarella-032

Through the atom transmitter Dianthus bestows several gifts on Barbarella to help her with her mission. The first of these is the “portable brainwave detector…to test for Durand-Durand’s presence.” To operate it, Barbarella must press “a contact,” (Dianthus is offscreen when he indicates the contact, but later we see her operating the leaf-like button near the wrist) and if Durand-Durand is around, the ball of lights will glow and an alarm will sound.

vlcsnap-00002

The device is wearable, wrapping around Barbarella’s forearm, and held in place by a ring. This aspect of the design is good, since it means the device is ever-present for operation, and the design of it makes it lovely enough to be overlooked as a fashion accessory. In fact many characters see her wearing it and make no mention.

PBD_worn

Manual activation is less than ideal, though, since this might tip off the suspect. This is especially true with the blinking, glowing ball of light and audio feedback. And, in fact, this is what happens later in the film when Durand-Durand trips over the device. The blinking light and audio catch his attention, betray the device for what it is, and blow Barbarella’’s cover in the process.

Portable Brainwave Device

The best feedback would be invisible, like a haptic vibration through the cuff to her skin. Ideally, the device would be constantly on, to detect the subject passively, the moment he came into range. But presuming battery life is the issue, the activation cue should be something much more subtle, like Barbarella’s touching the back of the ring with the thumb of the same hand. Such a gesture would match the existing design of the object, be discreet to an observer, and yet still discrete enough to prevent accidental activation.