I have a question. Have the voting public moved on from the personality contests we’ve seen before? Likeability was all the rage with celebrity elections.
Well, I remember years ago when the argument was that there was not much difference in the various sides, at least to presidential politics. That it was more often a choice of who you liked better, or the personality of the candidate. And who could perform better? In the end, both would be formidable at doing the top job and securing our republic for future posterity. It was almost a given the same objectives held for both, or so people assumed.
However, those tired old arguments no longer seem to hold. It is no longer true that any common interests can be taken for granted on given issues. There are drastic differences between the sides themselves — with Ds and Rs. Not just between the candidates.
You can’t have a bigger difference than a wild idea of open borders verses securing the borders and national security interests. Abandoning a central purpose of government has made a stark difference, at a giant cost. But there are others.
For all the complaints, the era of Trump has laid bare that there are differences, polar opposites, with the agendas of either side. No one has made it clearer. It is not as if he made all those differences up. He did not have to look for contrasts, they are everywhere.
Back to the voters at large. It just seems to me that people have given up on personality contests of old. Or at least put them aside in view of real, serious concerns. Those greater concerns have taken central focus in their votes. They’ve moved on.
You might say that we always had that under our hood — issues are paramount in our process. But were they? People really liked Barack Obama personally, and how did that work out for us?
So now I believe people moved on and were also awakened to the ugly side of government itself. Left to its own devices, there are real worries about government power and the Deep State roots. I don’t believe people across the board are somehow comfortable with an all-powerful government controlling and regulating everything. The pandemic exposed many failures to an out-of-control government. No one can deny what we saw. It was not all conspiracy theories like they told us. We are not crazies anymore.
Next, I think the estrogen vote, as one issue, is played out. Can you vote for someone just because of their gender, their race, ethnicity, sexuality or any identity? That has gotten old and we now have the fallout from the DEI agenda emerging. How’d that work out?
All that is to say the old way of politics and organizing doesn’t seem to hold the same water it once did. People have taken note. But Barry Soetoro went to Pittsburgh to lecture black people for not voting as a bloc the way they did for him, for Kamala. He injected the reason is the “brothers” are not comfortable voting for a woman.
It is condescending and offensive to black people to expect them to vote a certain way. So long as they do that there is no problem. But if they don’t… all hell will break loose. We saw black men voting for Hillary, so how is there a woman problem? Now that Trump has cut into Democrats’ demographic lock on identities, there is a whole lot of anxiety in the DNC. “It shouldn’t be happening, it’s not fair. Folks cannot just leave the plantation to make their own decisions, for their own independent reasons. That’s absurd!”
Maybe Democrats do not own people’s votes the way they assumed? Biden told them “if you do not vote for me, then you ain’t black.” That’s as insulting as Barry telling blacks that particularly “the brothers” are stepping out of line. What Biden and Obama said is the same thing. When you scold people over who they support, and plug in self-serving strawman reasons, then someone has a problem. But it isn’t blacks voting for Trump.
So maybe voting and election politics has really changed. Maybe people have bigger concerns about the state of the country or their own interests? Maybe the old Obama formula no longer works? I don’t need some organizer or union boss telling me what issues I should care about and whom to vote for. This was the second time Obama insulted people in Pennsylvania. Remember how he categorically slurred Pa voters years back? How they cling to guns and religion, and have antipathy for those not like them?
If he only knew more about me, he would know the reason for my vote. But he doesn’t; he only wants to smear my rationale or motives. I don’t need a guy to airdrop in, who cares nothing about my interests, diagnosing why and how I vote. It’s a serious matter. I sure as heck am not voting the way a hack scolds me to vote. Give me real actual reasons to get my vote, but don’t mock me for not conforming to your specious political paradigm.
Stick your rubber stamp where the sun ain’t shining!
So have we really moved past the identity lock of plantation politics, or not? You decide.
Just don’t call them Uncle Toms, or me unrealistic, for wanting a different politics.
Well, Obama, who is endorsing the politics of yesteryear now? (See 2014 video) – [the same Soetoro who was in office as ISIS was spawned. His crystal ball is flawed. And since those old ways of politics worked so well for us, right?]
We always hear that no one wants to see the ugly process of how the sausage is made. But there is something worse: the good ol’ political paradigm that built the sausage machine.
Right Ring | Bullright | 2024
