Posts Tagged ‘race’

What is it like to be a Black? — Reggie Harris

September 30, 2025

Philosopher Thomas Nagel famously wrote on What is it Like to be a Bat? But trying to understand other people is a more deeply felt part of our human nature. I’ve written much about pondering over my own conscious experience, hard enough to fathom. Harder yet trying to imagine being someone else.

I’ve particularly thought about what it’s like being Black. Those are shoes my imagination cannot really walk in. My whiteness does not require much of my attention; but a Black American must be forced to think about race pervasively.

I had an intense conversation about that with Hajira, a student from Somaliland. Where, everyone being Black, it’s just not an issue. Visiting there, I actually felt more conscious of being White. But not of course in the way Black Americans must be conscious of their race, given all the history there and still persisting social dynamics. Without that personal context, even in America Hajira did not similarly feel her Blackness.

Right after, I happened to read a book that was a veritable tutorial on this subject. It’s Searching for Solid Ground, a 2024 memoir by Reggie Harris, of the folk-singing couple Kim and Reggie Harris. I’m no music buff, but I really liked them back in the day, with inspiring songs about the Underground Railroad and resistance to slavery. So I went to Reggie’s talk at the Albany library and bought his book. It’s mainly about his life in music. And — how race infused its every aspect.

Kim and Reggie were never famous, and toured extensively giving performances to make a living. This was past the “Green Book” days when doing that while Black would have been much tougher. The nevertheless disturbing episodes Reggie does relate were small stuff in comparison. Yet, far as we’ve progressed, race was still always there for them in a way it never is for whites. Always a subtext in their minds in their interactions with whites. A constant source of anxiety and unease.

This afflicts Black Americans with an extra dimension of chronic psychological stress, that doesn’t appertain to whites; and it’s a presumptive factor in a poorer overall health picture.

I have written of coming to generally admire Black Americans, as actually superior people. Precisely because of all the shit they’ve had to endure. It’s so much harder being Black than white. I’ve quoted activist Kimberly Jones that we’re lucky Blacks seek only equality, not revenge. And noted how, given our fraught history, I’m often struck by the niceness of Black strangers toward me.

But maybe that’s been naivete. A passage in Harris’s book really hit me: “Like most African American men, I’ve learned many skills that have enabled me to navigate and survive the tricky terrain of being Black in America. These skills include reading people, observing their behavior . . . keeping a low profile, smiling to reduce conflict, and engaging in non-threatening behaviors so as not to offend White people and to promote solidarity.”

Suggesting that the smiles I’ve gotten from Black people may frequently have been a defensive front. I don’t fault this. People do what they feel they must. And anyhow, smiles are better than glares.

* * *

Kim and Reggie Harris were a couple for over forty years. For a dozen of which she helped him through an increasingly horrible illness, culminating in a liver transplant, and his slow recovery. Some years after, they parted ways. I was sad to read that; Harris has little to say about it.

The book ends on a positive note, elaborating on his own personal growth, with regard to race and other life issues. The “turmoil of 2020” looms large, with a scathing string of words to describe the first Trump administration. Which Harris saw us rising past. But his book was finished before the 2024 election, giving us a far bleaker encore. I too had once optimistically seen America rising past historical iniquity. But we’ve gone off course.

Trump War on DEI Promotes Not Merit But Racism

March 13, 2025

In 1972, as a young Public Service Commission lawyer, cross-examining a utility company executive in a rate hearing, I asked how many employees they had.

He gave a number. Then I asked, “How many are Black?”

Was I an early social justice warrior, ahead of my time? Or just a wise guy? It did not go over well.

Oddly enough, I was a conservative Republican then — though cognizant of historic racial discrimination. “Affirmative action” was new and highly contentious. The idea was to make up for past unfairness by giving its victims favorable treatment now. But the policy’s beneficiaries would not usually be the same individuals who suffered in the past. While other individuals would be disadvantaged.

However, individual redress was not the real aim. Instead, it was societal redress — giving ethnic minorities not so much a preference as a fair representation in classrooms and workplaces.

The 2020 George Floyd killing raised consciousness about persisting racial disparities; while the Supreme Court, which had previously okayed some forms of affirmative action, now backtracked on that. But meantime many major corporations nevertheless felt obliged to be responsive to social concerns and the zeitgeist, so adopted a DEI policy— “diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

The three words, taken at face value, all stand for good things most people endorse. Though promoting those ideals while avoiding reverse discrimination might have seemed like trying to square a circle. Awarding non-white applicants extra points remained problematic — discriminatory against whites. But things aren’t so simple. Hirings are not typically matters of totting up points, but judgments based on diffuse considerations. If a white and a Black job seeker stand pretty equal, there’s nothing wrong with choosing the latter for the sake of workplace diversity and inclusiveness.

Especially as an antidote to the discriminatory biases that still lurk (often below the radar) even among people of goodwill. Studies have shown that Black-sounding names on resumes (and females too) tend to get shorter shrift.

That’s why DEI as a general policy objective — as opposed to constituting an explicit hiring heuristic — is a worthy concept. Helping us become a more just and admirable society overall.

Enter Mister Trump. To curry favor with him (and reflecting what seems a new zeitgeist), corporations all across the country have scrambled to scrub DEI words from their websites and mission statements.*

So much for diversity. So much for equity. So much for inclusion. Don’t want none of that no more. Gimme that old time religion.

The Supreme Court, in its decisions on affirmative action, at least notionally wrestled with the difficult fairness issues. Not at all simple, as this posting might suggest. Trump however is a black-and-white kind of guy, not a shades-of-grey guy. And he stands squarely on the white side.

Thus his war on DEI — and “wokism,” linked with it. Democrats overdo their ethnic and sexual/gender identity politics, but identity politics is actually bigger in the Trump cult. Thus all the weird insistence on only two genders; non-conforming people freak them out.

And the cult’s deepest core is white tribal anxiety over the societal ascendance of previously subordinated minorities. A non-white president really freaked them out.

So Trump blames DEI for everything from plane crashes to wild fires to the Baltimore bridge disaster. The hardly camouflaged racist message is that DEI has meant hiring non-whites who are presumptively inferior. All the verbiage invoking “merit” caters to the prejudice that Blacks don’t have it.

It’s nonsense. But such is the belief of white supremacists — too dumb to realize that this ignorant belief itself proves they’re the inferior ones.

* Though Apple’s shareholders voted 97% against a move to expunge DEI.

“We Carry Their Bones” — A Florida Horror Story

November 10, 2024

This book by anthropologist/archeologist Erin Kimmerle relates her authorized official investigations at the site of the Dozier School, a “reform school” in Florida’s panhandle, operating from 1900 to 2011. Actually a prison. Incarcerating thousands of boys, sentenced for mostly minor notional offenses, some as young as five, mostly Black.

“Throwaways” they’ve been called. Dozier was a nightmare world of violence and abuse. Its infamous “White House” a beating shack. Other victims were immured for weeks in tiny bleak isolation cells. It didn’t take much in the way of “misbehavior” to incur such drastic punishment.

Unsurprisingly, many boys tried to escape; usually recaptured, with severe repercussions. Authorities acknowledged 31 bodies buried on the premises, though mostly unidentified, with scanty records. Kimmerle, after surmounting a gauntlet of obstruction against her work, ultimately found 55 burials.

In such a place, some discipline, maybe even corporal punishment, would be expected. But what happened at Dozier could only have been sheer sadistic cruelty, for its own sake.

After all, these were mostly Black kids.

No better than animals, to the white men staffing Dozier. But in such cases, I always think not even animals should suffer like that.

Kimmerle has surprisingly little to say about sexual abuse. She does relate one head of the school singling out particular boys. But maybe such things are harder to be clear about.

There’s also only one vague mention of anyone (apart from inmates!) ever charged with crimes at Dozier. The outcome of those few cases isn’t stated.

The Thirteenth Amendment outlawed “involuntary servitude,” except as part of punishment for crimes. The South used this loophole to establish a pervasive crypto-slavery system, charging Black men with dubious offenses to force them into brutal unpaid work. Dozier was part of this, its boys put to work or sent out for it. All part of the Jim Crow regime to keep Blacks “in their place” — as reviled subhuman non-citizens whose very existence was barely tolerated — a “place” often enforced by terror. That was the point of lynchings. A victim’s guilt or innocence was beside the point.

Dozier’s horrors couldn’t be buried with all those bodies. Many inmates did emerge alive and spoke out. Over the decades, numerous official inquiries all resulted in whitewash.

Even after Dozier’s closure, Kimmerle shows, local sentiment and officialdom were hostile toward any exposure of the truth. A depressingly familiar syndrome. I was reminded of Britain’s recent Post Office scandal — faulty accounting software resulted in legions of local postmasters falsely prosecuted for theft. For years the bureaucracy refused to acknowledge anything wrong with this picture.*

In Dozier’s case, the unwillingness of locals to see anything amiss was compounded by racism. Victim advocates were viewed as just troublemakers with bad motives, racial attitudes pervading the whole picture.

Not so long ago, we fancied our racial divide was healing. With a Black president even. Turned out that enflamed matters — whites being okay with Black advancement, but only up to a point. Now many feel threatened. Trump has nakedly played to this and exacerbated it. Making his re-election all the more societally destructive.

The State of Florida eventually officially acknowledged the epic wrong that was Dozier, trying to make some amends. One legislative enactment along such lines passed the State House of Representatives 114 to 3. Among the three dissenters was then-member Matt Gaetz.

* * *

Kimmerle made great efforts not only to find burials but then to identify whose. Generally the bodies had been interred unceremoniously, hence with little left to exhume. But the team was able to extract DNA even from bone fragments and thereby identify many victims. Amazing modern science.

Much of the book concerns this work. There was a lot of hand-wringing over what to do with the unidentifiable remains, with consensus that they couldn’t just be reburied onsite. Some that were identified were sent to their families, enabling re-interments and some sort of “closure.” Boys dying at Dozier many decades before had not been forgotten. Loving familial bonds, the intensity of such human attachments, ennobles us.

Yet, though we are embodied in our physical selves while alive, afterward the dead corporeal remains should lose meaning. Our connections to our dead reside in our hearts and minds, our remembrance, not in their disintegrated bones.

Those families already knew, basically, what had befallen their kin. Receiving a box of remains really adds nothing. I think we’re too fixated on such physicality, it’s a kind of superstition.

Am I too rational? Early painters sometimes inserted skulls in still lifes, called “Memento Mori,” reminders we must die. I am indeed often reminded that I will someday be a skull and bones — and even those will melt away. Yet my existence will already have ended — absolutely. What happens to my bones thereafter can be no concern to me. Nor should it be to anyone else.

Coming to grips with this is a great challenge of life.

*I’ve written about this: https://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/2024/05/12/the-british-post-office-scandal-how-not-to-handle-one/

My Racial Bias

October 29, 2024

There are two great errors. First, that whites are superior. While societies predominantly white may have logged greater technological and cultural achievements, that’s due to no biological superiority but rather sheer happenstance. Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs and Steel carefully analyzed how lucky circumstances of geography and natural environments set the stage for those divergent stories. Not white westerners being somehow smarter or better.

Desperate efforts by past white chauvinist researchers to prove otherwise all failed — proving only their prejudices.

If anything, when it comes to African-Americans in particular, there is actually good reason why they might be the biologically superior ones. Thanks to Darwinian “survival of the fittest.” Slavery’s horrors, and all the other adversities Black Americans have long faced, should have weeded out the weaker and dumber, leaving descendants of the survivors with above average genetic endowments.

The other great fallacy is the supposed evil of race mixing. The idea of racial purity to be maintained, staving off “mongrelization” and “pollution.” If slave owners were truly concerned on this score, maybe they shouldn’t have raped and impregnated so many Black women. As a result, virtually no American Blacks today are “racially pure.”

But in any case, this racial purity bugaboo flouts a true scientific principle — hybrid vigor. We actually know that reproduction between two individuals of any species having divergent genetics produces healthier offspring. Whereas in-breeding does the opposite. Thus race mixing is good, not bad (even apart from socio-cultural benefits of breaking down barriers between peoples).

Yet of course racial bias persists. Scientific studies have proven that Americans tend to have more negative feelings arise when shown images of Black people, compared to seeing whites. This is true even of Blacks themselves, who tend to absorb at least some of the deep cultural stigmatization of their own ethnicity.

So deeply embedded is this bias that it’s hard to entirely surmount. I’ve had it myself and can still detect vestigial unconscious twinges of it. Even while my conscious persona has actually veered into an opposite bias. For a long time now I’ve been experiencing (and reinforcing) more positive feelings toward Black people than whites.

One might imagine that, given all the dire history, Blacks would not reciprocate this. But in my experience, I detect almost no such resentment, but rather generalized cheerful human goodwill. Returning my smiles. Which indeed I find all the more ennobling when considering all the shit that Black people have had to endure in their lives, and still endure.

My positive feelings toward them are also mindful of how much they contribute to society, all the needed work they do. I suspect many whites are oblivious. I travel to Baltimore several times yearly, a city where Blacks are overwhelmingly predominant in service jobs, at the airport, in restaurants, hotels, etc. I love seeing it, and salute them.

For whites, on the other hand, I feel no tribal affinity. Certainly no “us-against-them” vis-a-vis non-whites. My Jewish ancestry may play a role, but I don’t have any tribal feelings there either; perhaps it actually helps neutralize all that. Meantime, looking at white people, I’m mindful how much distasteful racial animus lurks below the surface in many. More than I used to think, as Trump has brought forth. In recent years, politics has infused my feelings in that regard.

I’m still a humanist, believing most humans more good than bad, but I consider Trump support very bad, and a majority of whites support Trump. Not anyone I hang out with, and indeed, not many I encounter in my local area. But others, generic whites, come under default suspicion. While the great majority of non-whites are non-Trumpy. Part of the calculus skewing my racial bias in favor of non-whites.

Charleston

June 23, 2015

The irony of such blows for “white supremacy” is their demonstrating its fallacy — showing what better people the blacks are than the shooter. (Also, he might have finally succeeded in getting his beloved Confederate flag removed from the state capitol.)

Americanah — Please Smack This Woman

October 31, 2014

Adichie

Adichie

Ifemelu didn’t know she was black – until, as a teenager, she came to America from Nigeria. She’s the focus of Nigerian/American Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s 2013 novel, Americanah. It’s garnered great reviews as penetrating social commentary about both countries.

Many novels are non-chronological, often starting with a dramatic scene and then going to the backstory. I get that. But Americanah cut back and forth so much that I had trouble keeping things straight.

Ifemelu’s teenaged Nigerian boyfriend was Obinze. It was no casual attachment, but portrayed as obviously quite deep. Yet soon after arriving in America, she stops reading or answering his e-mails and letters, cuts him off without a word. Why? No reason I could see. Near the end she gives a reason; but (to me) a lame one.

article-1162718-03F37C2E000005DC-317_468x377Soon she’s in a fairy tale romance with Curt – handsome, rich, charming, warm, smart – white – and mad for her. They’re jetting to London and Paris on whim, etc. Then Ifemelu, for no particular reason, has a one night stand with a pallid grunge musician. Credible? Maybe. She informs Curt. Credible? Not so much. Curt throws her out. Credible? Well – I had a similar experience once (for a different, stupider reason).

Unknown-1Then Ifemelu starts a blog on race matters from the perspective of a non-American black. Many blog postings are given verbatim. We’re apparently supposed to think they’re highly insightful and provocative. I did not. To me they flogged tired, whiny racial tropes we’ve heard a thousand times. Yet Ifemelu’s blog is wildly successful, she actually gets a living from it, attracting contributions and advertisers, speaking gigs proliferate, and she winds up with a Princeton fellowship.

Unknown(How does this happen? Someone please tell me – my blog, since ’08, obviously has highly excellent content, but its readership could fit in a phone booth (well, OK, a big one, and it would be very tight), and I’ve never earned a cent. Of course, I do it for love.)

images-1The book is full of party scenes — populated by effete, politically hip intellectual poseurs. They’re mildly satirized, which is mild fun, up to a point, but enough is enough.

Ifemelu’s next live-in boyfriend is Blaine, a black Yale professor, another Prince Charming. So maybe it’s not an epic passion, but c’mon, a lot of folks would kill for such a nice mellow relationship. Yet after several years (and 13 in America) Ifemelu decides to chuck it all – Blaine, blog, Princeton – to return to Nigeria. Why? Beats me.

images-2It’s not as though Nigeria has improved since she left. Indeed, it’s gone downhill, growing even more dysfunctional and corrupt. The typical American hasn’t the faintest idea how different a nation like that is. Adichie does illuminate a lot of Nigeria’s rottenness. And yet, another thing I disliked about the book is its narrow portrayal of the country – the only Nigerians we meet are middle or upper class or intelligentsia.images There’s no sense that this is a thin crust atop a vast populace at best just eking out an existence. Those Nigerian masses are invisible here.

(Also unmentioned is Boko Haram, now in control of a large territory – showing that Nigeria’s government and army exist only for predation, and are useless to help or protect the populace. Yet, doing end-runs around their useless government, Nigeria’s creative and enterprising people are bubbling with entrepreneurship.)

Once back there, Ifemelu starts a new blog, about Nigeria (or at least that thin crust) – again a roaring success. She has an old friend, Ranyi, in fact a very good loyal friend who helps Ifemelu a lot. Ranyi is the kept woman of a married “big man,” a common Nigerian situation, which Ifemelu scathingly blogs about, the portrayal of Ranyi being unmistakeable. Ranyi complains. Ifemelu blows her off, saying she really had in mind her own Aunty Uju, whose being a general’s mistress “destroyed” her life.

Say what?

Destroyed? Aunty Uju, when her general suddenly croaked, got out of Nigeria with enough to reach America and became a doctor. And brought up the general’s child as her well beloved son.

I found Ifemelu unlikeable. If that was the author’s intent, she succeeded, but somehow I doubt it was. This novel had a very autobiographical feel.

UnknownThere’s still Obinze, Ifemelu’s teen heart-throb. We’ve been following his adventures too. He’s become quite rich – the Nigerian way, that is, by sucking up to a “big man” who lets him in on a deal plundering the public treasury. Despite this, Obinze is yet another guy portrayed too good to be true, a saint so bursting with virtues and devoid of faults that it made me gag.

Ifemelu finally contacts him before her return to Nigeria. And then, once there, fails to follow up. Would someone please smack this woman upside the head? But maybe it’s just my biased perspective. I worked so hard to get a good partner, and value her so much, that Ifemelu’s insouciance rankles.

Unknown-2Of course I won’t reveal the ending, but you can guess it. Such endings are supposed to be satisfying to the reader. But I felt a less saccharine conclusion would have been truer to what preceded it.