Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How to understand vacuum squeezing in quantum optics?

+0
−0

The part that's easy to understand is that amplitude and phase are non-commuting so the more precise you are on one, the more uncertainty in the other.

But how, in an application like LIGO, are the amplitude and phase uncertainties controlled?

I have looked for explanations and found partial ones that raise more questions. One question is how a frequency-halving crystal results in changes to uncertainty levels. The other is related to what sound like claims that it's the vacuum itself that is getting squeezed, and if I'm guessing right, that there's a beam of squeezed vacuum with no photons?

So clearly this is one of the quantum things impossible to understand with classical analogies.

What is a way to think about how LIGO light squeezing is implemented that makes sense, as much as anything quantum makes sense?

For a bonus, is there a way to understand how their "filter cavities" produce different squeezing for different gravitational wave frequencies?

History

1 comment thread

Related discussions (1 comment)

Sign up to answer this question »