How to be a free-thinker, part two

Following on from last week’s wibblette, my intent with this one is to try to persuade you to consider using tools other than the ones that you probably use because everyone else does (apologies if that’s not the case). There are alternatives to ‘googling’ for your information – although I do have to admit that ‘duckduckgoing’ is unlikely to ever make it into any dictionary.

But before I attempt to do that, allow me to digress a little….

There’s a sucker born every minute

Once upon a time, back when Windows 3.1 came out, the improvement over MS-DOS led me to consider Microsoft the best thing since sliced bread. I devoted myself to learning as much as I could about this marvellous new OS. I even (shock, horror!) RTFM. And I sang its praises, encouraging others to use it – and I helped them out enthusiastically when they ran into trouble. I wasn’t just a fan, I was a fanatic. To this day (naturally), Microsoft never acknowledged me, and thousands like me, for either my loyalty or my advocacy (of Win3.1 and variants since); it never rewarded my salesmanship and endless hours of unpaid product support on its behalf.

I was a naïve fool. These days, I no longer hold the word ‘microsoft’ in such high esteem; it no longer even warrants even the initial capital. And as for the once-richest-man-on-the-planet Bill Gates: well, don’t get me started.

When the Internet began to rise in popularity, microsoft dismissed it as a fad (not long afterwards, of course, they did a complete U-turn and announced that they were going to ‘own’ it). Here in the UK at that time, a company called ‘Demon Internet’ arose. I was in thrall to its ‘tenner-a-month’ connection ideal. I spent a lot of time providing the company with error reports and feedback. I did my best to convince my friends to sign up to it; and I willingly helped those folks when they had trouble… again, all unpaid. (Are you beginning to spot a theme, here?)

When the company’s co-founder, Cliff Stanford, sold the company in 1998 for £66 million, I thought, “Oi! Where’s my share of that?”

Along came the Google search engine. I soon grokked that it was streets ahead of its competition (such widgets as Infoseek, Ask Jeeves, Altavista, WebCrawler, Lycos and their ilk). The biggest advantage I saw in Google was its focus on pure search: whereas all its competitors had blinking, flashy, irritating adverts on their pages slowing things down to a crawl, Google’s search engine loaded quickly because it had none of that baggage. Also, Google’s slogan ‘Don’t be evil’ appealed to me. And so, I promoted it to all my friends… again, totally unacknowledged, unthanked, and, of course, unpaid.

Fast forward to the present. Google reinvented itself as ‘Alphabet’ in 2015, and subsequently quietly sidelined the ‘Don’t be evil’ motto. Personally, I think they just removed the “Don’t,” having succumbed to the evil inherent in the pursuit of money.

There’s a sucker born every minute, and once upon a time that sucker was me. I like to think that I’m wiser now, even though some say, “you can’t teach an old dog new tricks”. I wouldn’t know about that, having never been a dog. And, besides, I’m more of a cat person anyway.

All this taught me valuable lessons, such as:

  1. Things Change.
  2. Advocates are Rarely Rewarded.
  3. All Upgrades include a Deleterious Dose of Downsides.

Interlude

Four things to know about misinformation
(Inoculate yourself: download the free Debunking Handbook 2020)

Echo chambers, filter bubbles and FAKE NEWS!!!!1

When you have a notion that most people near you consider crazy, such as, oh, I don’t know, ‘the Earth is flat’, or maybe ‘the lunar landings were faked’, it’s wise to keep schtum if you don’t want to be ridiculed. Pre-Internet, it was pretty hard to find folks willing to listen without laughing you out of court, so such lunatic memes gained little traction.

In the Internet era, however, it’s quite easy to hook up with like-minded others and bounce barmy ideas around. In your new-found echo chamber the zaniest hypothesis can all too easily blossom into a fully-fledged belief, and before you can say “the moon is made of green cheese” you and your inner circle of allies have gone forth and multiplied, spreading falsehoods and misinformation willy-nilly.

And then along come AI algorithms cultivated by avaricious megacorporations such as Google (sorry, ‘Alphabet’) and Facebook (sorry, ‘Meta’) that grow fat on producing almost nothing at all.†

When you go to Google and type in ‘climate change is’ you’re going to see different results depending on where you live and the particular things that Google knows about your interests. That’s not by accident; that’s a design technique.

Google’s search engine learns your preferences and offers you results accordingly. If it ‘knows’ you enjoy shopping for shoes then it’s primed to offer you, er, ‘shoppy’ and ‘shoey’ results. And if (for instance) it has you flagged as a flat-Earther and you go looking for evidence for that, it will merrily offer you exactly what you’re looking for whether it’s based on scientific fact or the musings of some misguided fool (I almost added ‘like me’ there, but thought better of it). Your preconceptions get reinforced by such filter bubbles, and the natural tendency is to go looking for more, dismissing any information that contradicts your worldview on the way.

From here it’s “one small step for mankind” (to misuse a phrase) and a single letter change, to turn misinformation into disinformation. There are those who seek to pervert information to their own ends, and we are blindly handing them the keys to the kingdom.

For far too many, money – and its acquisition – is akin to a religion. Money means power. Power corrupts; and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The powerful already have a firm grasp on the global purse strings – and they are tightening the screws.

When religion and politics travel in the same cart, the riders believe nothing can stand in their way. Their movements become headlong – faster and faster and faster. They put aside all thoughts of obstacles and forget the precipice does not show itself to the man in a blind rush until it’s too late.

Frank Herbert, ‘Dune’

Though it may already be too late, the only way out I can see is for each and every one of us to place more value on our own data privacy. We can sit back on our laurels and be seduced by the dark side, or we can choose other paths, such as those offered by tools like Signal (an excellent alternative to FacebookMeta’s WhatsApp), Proton (emails in envelopes? who’d’a thunk it?), Sync (cloud storage that’s secure, encrypted, unlike Big Tech’s offerings) and search engines such as DuckDuckGo that promise not to track you.

And, yes, I’m not blind to the fact that here I am pumping a pulpit yet again, advocating others’ widgets. Even those who make a big song and dance about their highly ethical pro-privacy stance might at some point change tack. But I do like to think that forewarned is forearmed, and doing nothing at all about the problem is, for me at least, not an option.


† … unless you, like most of today’s crop of economists, consider consumerism a worthwhile pursuit, and ‘economic growth’ a noble addition to humanity’s aspirations. (In case you hadn’t already guessed: I do not consider trashing our home planet to make the wealthy even more so anything but reprehensible.) Software development doesn’t come cheap, I admit: it needs smart minds, resources, and plenty of time (especially if you want to do it right). But once you’ve written the code, making copies costs bugger all. The trick is to persuade the punters to cough up the dosh to pay back that initial investment (and then some, naturally). And then again. And again. And… well, you get the picture. Having built a megacorporation, you have to find some way to keep the lights on.

Posted in ... wait, what?, Communication, Computers and Internet, Core thought, Education, Phlyarology, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

How to be a free-thinker, part one

Throwing off shackles is a two-stage process:

  1. Recognise the problem.
  2. Act to address it.

One has to acknowledge that a box exists before being able to think outside it.

Me, 2021

Google and Facebook track you, learn how you think, and seek to manipulate you in pursuit of the Great God Profit. In Netflix’s documentary ‘The Social Dilemma‘, some of the designers of social [sic] media systems openly admit as much – and express serious misgivings about their involvement.

The Social Dilemma | Official Trailer | Netflix
Transcript below (so as not to spoil the flow)

I was using the World Wide Web before either Google or Facebook arrived on the scene. Whenever I registered on a new site, I did so using an email & password combination, at the time using my ‘One Ring‘ system to generate unique passwords for each one.

I got into the habit of doing that. When Google and Facebook began offering the option of logging in to sites using their credentials, I did consider it briefly as it offered greater convenience. However, I decided to continue with my original plan, as I suspected that these corporations probably had an ulterior motive. Anything ‘free’ is worth what you pay for it. TANSTAAFL.

If you’re going to put all of your eggs into one basket, make certain that you control the basket.

Me, just now.

Fast forward to now, and I’m so very glad that I decided not to be seduced. Those businesses have become megacorporations, ‘Big Tech’, and they earn their billions by manipulating us all. My lack of connection to their systems means that they can’t ‘learn me’ as well as they can someone who has chosen to effectively allow them access to information about what they do and where and when they do it.

Back in February last year, I deleted my faecesbook account. That in itself was (unsurprisingly) not as easy to do as it should have been – and I still have doubts that they have actually deleted the data they held on me; I suspect that they probably consider all those particular bits and bytes to be ‘their property’. (I’ve no doubt that the click-thru ‘agreement’ I clicked though without reading when I first registered years ago said as much, or if it didn’t then it was amended at some point – using the ‘we reserve the right to alter this agreement whenever we choose’ clause – so that it does now.)

Others are doing likewise; Paul Handover of Learning from Dogs, for instance. I urge you to check out Paul’s recent post ‘Goodbye to Facebook‘, which features an illuminating TED talk by Carole Cadwalladr entitled ‘Facebook’s role in Brexit – and the threat to democracy‘. Governments around the world seem unable, or unwilling, to rein in Big Tech’s influence. It seems to me that the only way to curb its power is for others to quit, in droves… but it too few see the chaos it’s creating, let alone recognise the danger of allowing that to continue.

Had I got into the habit of logging in to other sites using my Facebook login credentials, deleting my account there would have effectively locked me out of those, albeit temporarily. I’m glad that wasn’t a factor for me. Perhaps that’s something that makes those who think about leaving faecesbook pause? If that’s the case for you, then it might be wise to consider setting up separate email & password access to those systems you feel you can’t live without, in preparation for kicking fakebook into touch.

And then there’s the ubiquitous Google, whose subtle impact is reflected in the fact that its name has become a synonym for ‘search’. However, I’ll wibble a little about that next week, because as the old joke goes:

Q: How do you eat an elephant?
A: One bite at a time.


Netflix’s ‘The Social Dilemma’ (transcript)

When you go to Google and type in ‘climate change is’, you’re going to see different results depending on where you live and the particular things that Google knows about your interests. That’s not by accident; that’s a design technique.

What I want people to know is that everything they’re doing online is being watched, is being tracked; every single action you take is carefully monitored and recorded. A lot of people think Google’s just a search box, and Facebook’s just a place to see what my friends are doing. What they don’t realize is there’s entire teams of engineers whose job is to use your psychology against you.

“I was the co-inventor of the Facebook ‘like’ button.”

“I was the president of Pinterest.”

“… Google.”

“… Twitter.”

“… Instagram.”

There were meaningful changes happening around the world because of these platforms. I think we were naïve about the flip side of that coin.

We get rewarded by ‘hearts’, ‘likes’, ‘thumbs up’, and we conflate that with value and we conflate it with truth.

A whole generation is more anxious, more depressed.

I always felt like fundamentally it was the force for good. I don’t know if I feel that way anymore.

Facebook discovered that they were able to affect real world behaviour and emotions without ever triggering the user’s awareness. They are completely clueless.

Fake news spreads six times faster than true news. We’re being bombarded with rumours.

If everyone’s entitled to their own facts, there’s really no need for people to come together – in fact, there’s really no need for people to interact.

We have less control over who we are and what we really believe.

If you want to control the population of your country, there has never been a tool as effective as Facebook.

We built these things and we have a responsibility to change it. The intention could be: how do we make the world better? If technology creates mass chaos, loneliness, more polarization, more election hacking, more inability to focus on the real issues, we’re toast.

This is checkmate on humanity.

The Social Dilemma | Official Trailer | Netflix

The transcript above was made with the help of Sonix, which did most of the donkey work for a tiny fee (I did have to spend some time tidying it up). Note that I do not have the copyright owner’s permission to publish this transcript here. I’ve investigated the copyright rules regarding transcriptions (more about that here), and one thing I’ve learned is that it’s no defense to make a disclaimer like “these aren’t my words, no copyright infringement intended.” However, I offer the transcription here as a service to society (especially the deaf community). I do hope the copyright owner won’t object. And I hope that you find this video as entertaining and/or interesting as I did.

Posted in ... wait, what?, balance, Communication, Computers and Internet, Core thought, Culture, Strategy | Tagged , , , , | 18 Comments

I found this really relaxing. Exactly what I needed right now!

Marconi Union – Weightless

My blogging’s been slacking of late
My excuse: I’ve a lot on my plate.
I’d apologise for being so out of line
But I’m sorry, I just don’t have the time.
I’m in quite the bight
There’s no end in sight
Oh, wait: here’s one

Posted in ... wait, what?, Music, Water | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

We are getting close to it being too late!

Gaia, swirling heaven.
Mankind blossoms, then explodes;
the end: just deserts?

Paul Handover's avatarLearning from Dogs

As in we humans living on this planet.

Next Saturday I am giving a talk to our local Freethinkers and Humanists group on climate change. As a result of this I was doing some research on the subject and I thought that I would share what I found with you.

But first may I say that the new King of the United Kingdom, King Charles III, may not have ages and ages on the throne but he is a committed environmentalist. In a recent VoA article the Prince of Wales, as he was then, reported that when Charles opened the COP26 climate summit, held in Scotland last year, and gave the opening speech, urging world leaders seated in front of him to redouble their efforts to confront global warming, he warned: “Time has quite literally run out.”

It is us!

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)…

View original post 968 more words

Posted in ... wait, what?, Climate, Communication, Core thought, Education, Environment, GCD: Global climate disruption, perception, Reblogs, Strategy | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

There are far too many people on Spaceship Earth

… who lack basic essentials such as water, food, shelter, friends – and empathy.

Especially that last.

(Human) population is a serious problem; mainly because it’s crowding out the other residents of ‘our’ planet. The more serious issue, though, is overconsumption – and of course I mean by humans, and mostly by a small fraction of the total (now approaching eight billion). The other beings with whom we ‘share’ our world tend not to do that to the same extent; when they do transgress, they pay the price. We, even with our (allegedly) greater smarts, are not immune to the consequences of our actions.

We’ve been in overshoot since the early nineteen-seventies. If that is not corrected, and soon, we’ll live to regret it. But, in all likelihood, probably not for long.

If you have an hour and a quarter to spare, please watch the documentary ‘Breaking Boundaries‘, the trailer for which is below. Sadly, it’s only available on Netflix; in my opinion it should be on every channel across the world – and played at prime time every night until everyone gets the message.

Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet

Professor Johan Rockström: The science is clear, and has been communicated for the past 30 years; but still we’re not moving in the right direction. I don’t get depressed, I get angry. What are the systems that determine the state of the planet? This is about us. It is about our future.

Sir David Attenborough: All is not well with our planet. As we increase our pressures on Earth, we are now crossing irreversible tipping points.

Dr Anne Larigauderie: Nature is being degraded at a rate and a scale that is unprecedented.

Professor Terry Hughes: When we emit CO2, about a third has ended up in the ocean.

Dr Daniella Teixeira: There’s no sign of any wildlife at all.

Professor Veerabhadran Ramanathan: Based on the seven and a half million deaths, we have already crossed the boundary as far as aerosols are concerned.

Professor Terry Hughes: As we manipulate the planet’s climate, we’re literally playing with fire.

Professor Carlos Nobre: Are we concerned about fighting the climate crisis? The window is still open for us to have a future for humanity. We still have a chance.

Professor Johan Rockström: What we do between 2020 and 2030, it will be the decisive decade for humanity’s future on Earth.

Dr María Neira: Human health, animal health and environmental health – the three are so much linked.

Professor Johan Rockström: We’ve covered the whole planet with knowledge. The future’s not determined. The future is in our hands.

Sir David Attenborough: It’s a remarkable time to be alive. You may never look at the world in the same way again.

The transcript above was made with the help of Sonix, which did most of the donkey work for a tiny fee (I did have to spend some time tidying it up). Note that I do not have the copyright owner’s permission to publish this transcript here. I’ve investigated the copyright rules regarding transcriptions (more about that here), and one thing I’ve learned is that it’s no defense to make a disclaimer like “these aren’t my words, no copyright infringement intended.” However, I offer the transcription here as a service to society (especially the deaf community). I do hope the copyright owner won’t object. And I hope that you find this video as entertaining and/or interesting as I did.


In a time of crises, proper choice of priorities is crucial. Perspective is all-important.

And now, a return to the ‘far more important’ matters that dominate the *cough* news *cough*.

The Queen is dead.
All hail King Charles III.
God save the king!
:\

Posted in ... wait, what?, balance, Biodiversity, Core thought, Environment, Health, Strategy | Tagged , , | 16 Comments

This page is intentionally blank

I find myself today bereft of time
The words refuse to respond to my call
Much as I would prefer to make this rhyme
I fear I've set myself up for a fall

The trick'ry I've employed to hide this verse
Has not fooled you (because you're reading this)
Kudos, my friend; though you may swear and curse
My composition will not disburse bliss

And so, I think that I should now foreswear
Continuation of this futile thing
I'll leave you now and offer up a prayer
Today's remainder better things will bring
Posted in ... wait, what?, Just for laughs, Poetry | Tagged , , | 39 Comments

Good news: wa’ mIn has been reunited with his family!

I was going to simply add an addendum to last week’s wibblette to announce the good news… but then I realised that a better choice would be to make a separate post about it, as this would make it more likely that those of you who were kind enough to show you cared would get the news.

My stock of scheduled posts for Wibble’s usual Tuesday slot having long since run its course, I am obliged (admittedly by my own CDO tendency) to create a new post each week. As my imminent move leaves me little time for anything not related to it, this is fortunate: it kills two birds with one stone, and I always like doing that. †

Interlude

The Internet:
facilitating miscommunication at the speed of light since the late twentieth century

Me, 2006

There have always been pitfalls in human communication (it seems to me that other animals don’t suffer from that – but maybe they do; I’m no animal behaviour expert).

The advent of the Internet and the rise of ‘social [sic] media’ have made matters far worse. My attention was drawn recently to a trailer of a movie that I’ve put on my must-watch list:

The Social Dilemma | Official Trailer | Netflix

Back to the plot

Since wa’ mIn the black one-eyed cat sat on the mat outside my back door several days ago I’ve been trying all sorts of things to locate his owner, but none of them were bearing fruit. Several people suggested putting a post on Facebook; but I deleted my Facebook account in disgust a year and a half ago. I was invited to join ‘nextdoor‘ a while ago, and, fearing that it might just be a faecesbook wannabe clone (it is, pretty much), I gave it a shot. My post there went unremarked (not even a ‘like’).

So, feeling very much the hypocrite, I got in touch with someone I knew was on a local neighbourhood Facebook group and asked if she would post a message appealing for help. She did so, and it apparently generated a flurry of activity that resulted in enabling me to reunite wa’ mIn – his name, I now know, is actually Horatio – with his owner just two days later.

Qapla’!

† I actually don’t like killing birds at all. They’re very pretty. (Well, most of them are.)

Posted in ... wait, what?, collaboration, Communication | Tagged , , , | 13 Comments

It would seem that <wa’ mIn> has adopted me…

Is this your cat?

A black one-eyed cat

… because it’s not mine.

I made a mistake a few days ago (yep; another one).

I’d better start at the beginning…

I’ve seen this one-eyed black cat around the neighbourhood for some time now. It’s always been skittish in the past; I’ve tried making friends with it several times, but it didn’t want to know.

Now, I don’t like wasting anything (especially food). And my cat, vIghro’wIj (Klingon for ‘my cat’) is a bit of a fussy eater. He rarely cleans his plate. And so, I’ve got into the habit of taking yesterday’s dish into the garden every morning when I feed him (yes, I know that could encourage rats, but there are enough cats around here to keep them under control). Something (probably not a rat; I’ve only ever seen a few of those around here, and always cat-mauled dead ones) was eating those leftovers, as the plate would always be clean later in the day. I was beginning to think it was an invisible something, as I never saw it.

And then, a few days ago, I saw the black one-eyed cat in the garden again. And, this time, it responded well to my friendly overtures. It allowed itself to be stroked; it purred; it even stropped my legs.

I named it wa’ mIn (‘one eye’).

Here’s where the mistake came in: I gave wa’ mIn some kitten food (that vIghro’wIj will no longer eat for some odd reason, even though he’s not yet two years old; still a kitten, really). A whole pouch. And wa’ mIn wolfed (er, ‘tigered’?) it down. And, since then, it won’t leave. It sits by the back door. All. The. Time. When I open the door to go outside, it tries to come in. It. Won’t. Leave.

This wouldn’t be a problem, except that vIghro’wIj is clearly afraid of wa’ mIn. When wa’ mIn tries to do the usual cat protocol, sniffing vIghro’wIj’s backside, vIghro’wIj backs off – and sometimes even hisses and growls, which is most unlike him. When he’s out, he won’t respond to my calls as he usually does. He’s still returning each morning after his nightly prowls, but has to negotiate his way past wa’ mIn, dashing through the door when he figures he has enough room.

I don’t know how to encourage them to be friends.

wa’ mIn’s fur is very clean, and he (or she?) has clearly been eating well (more than the scraps I’ve been leaving out). In fact I suspect that it’s overweight. It must have an owner (not that cats have owners, of course; they have staff). I’ve asked my neighbours if they know whose cat wa’ mIn is. No luck so far: I’ll just have to keep trying.

One problem is that I have to move soon. (The house-hunting is the reason for my absence in the blogosphere of late; I’m sorry I’ve not been visiting my blogging friends’ sites as usual, I simply don’t have time at present.) When it comes time to move, I’ll have to abandon wa’ mIn. I’m sure it’ll survive, but, even so, I’d like to find its owner – assuming it has one – before I leave. So… if you can help, I’d appreciate it.


Update 31Aug2022

Good news: wa’ mIn has been reunited with his family!

Posted in ... wait, what? | Tagged , , | 22 Comments

Nature’s wonders are truly magnificent

Can you identify this fascinating creature?

This beautiful flutterer visited me recently
It arrived (and left) quite silently
Remarkably regal
I’ve never met its equal.

Coincidentally, I learned a new word today: cynosure.

Something that is the center of attention; an object that serves as a focal point of attraction and admiration.

Fairly inconspicuous… until provoked!

It could be a butterfly, but perhaps it’s a moth (I’m not clear on the difference).
*shrug* It’s a member of the Lepidoptera (though that’s harder to say).

Can you identify it?

(Isn’t nature wonderful?)

Posted in ... wait, what?, Biodiversity | Tagged , , , | 13 Comments

Who wants to be an unpaid billboard?

The fashion industry made a canny move in persuading millions to buy clothing that boldly bears brand names. I wish I knew how they managed that. I for one decided long ago that the only way I would wear such items is if the brand were to pay me for promoting their product (something that, naturally, would never happen).

When I was in the pub for my mid-litter-patrol reward pint last Wednesday, the young lady tending the bar complimented me on the T-shirt I was wearing. It was one of these:

Friends of the Earth ‘No Planet B’ T-shirt

While supping my pint, I pondered this. I looked up the ladies’ version of this T-shirt on my dumbphone, and then returned my empty glass to the bar. The young lady was still there, so I showed her the web page, and offered to send her the link. I left it at that, as she would need to give me her phone number for me to do that. She didn’t offer it (unsurprisingly; at a guess she was about a third of my age). But she did look up the Friends of the Earth website on her own dumbphone while we were chatting about it, so, who knows, maybe next week I’ll see her wearing one.

So, I set off on the second half of my weekly litter patrol… and pondered some more. And the final scene of V for Vendetta came to mind, in which a mass crowd, all wearing Guy Fawkes masks, surges towards the Houses of Parliament:

V for Vendetta – Great scene (finale)

Now, the problem with those masks is that they provide a measure of anonymity, and while this spectacle works well in a movie, it would be all too easy for such an event to be infiltrated and perverted by troublemakers.

But a T-shirt is a different matter. Imagine if enough people could be persuaded to wear this one as they go about their business. In the UK, our government recently revealed more of its fascist tendencies by implementing a law that allows them to punish, and even imprison, peaceful protesters. But while wearing a T-shirt with a specific message can be considered a form of protest, I’m pretty sure that there’s no law forbidding it. At least, not yet….

Enough people walking around wearing such a shirt would send a powerful message. I still hold out some hope that we can change such that we don’t consign all the residents of Spaceship Earth to an unhappy end.

So, might I ask you to consider buying one of these ‘No Planet B’ T-shirts from Friends of the Earth? They’re made from organic cotton, printed in the UK in a renewable energy powered factory, and a snip at just twenty quid each. You’ll be supporting a good cause.†

In fact, I’ll go one better than that: I’m willing to buy one each for the first five folks (it would be more but I’m not made of money!) to contact me (with name and address – I’ll obviously need that to get the shirt to you) to say you’ll have one. Because I’m not entirely stupid, there’s a catch, however: you have to agree to accept my gift under the terms of ‘ye Oath of Giftiness‘:

ye Oath of Giftiness, image

† There’s a megacorporation I won’t name that sells cheaper shirts than the Friends of the Earth one bearing the same ‘No Planet B’ message (though not the same design), but I can’t vouch for whether or not those are mass-produced in overseas sweatshops. (My guess is they probably are.)

Posted in ... wait, what?, Communication, crowdsourcing, memetics, Phlyarology, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments