and stops the smock and linger of pond racket

Again (again?) thinking about that treacherous “about”-ness of poems, or of my attempts toward a poem. How seeking to write “about” some Important Thing makes my work flat and explainy and earnest in the way of a Hallmark card. Nevertheless, I persevere. I have been trying to figure out how to write a poem that informs, as I want to talk about Important Subjects in a way that Opens the Eyes, but I want to do it with grace, ease, play, subtlety.

But do I, as a reader, want to be informed? Is that what I want from a poem? No. Something else. I want the something elseness of poetry. The subtext and subtle unsaid and loud silences and momentary confusions that ease into — what? — a moment of wisdom, maybe, or of connection to an Other, or of perspective, insight, or something more visceral — the ah ha, the oh, the yes.

What I admire about this poem by Jennifer K. Sweeney is that she is committed to communicating information but also to the playful use of sound and language to carry that information out of the sometimes-tedious realm of explication. And also how the denseness and movement of it enact the subject matter. How it dams and flows, hurriedly gathers and lets loose.

I sometimes ponder the arcane information I have learned from fiction — I know to keep my heels down if I go off a ski jump (thanks, Nancy Drew), and how starfish regrow arms (thanks, Madeleine L’Engle), that the province of Quebec is a hotbed of organized crime (thanks, Louise Penny). But I have not considered all that I’ve learned from poems, mostly because what I learn is less arcane information and more like life. But hey, if a poem wants to slip me some info, well, bring it.

Slowing Down the River

Jennifer K. Sweeney

 
When beavers are threatened—
water moves faster, darts straighter, stops
its slow seesaw into sloughs and side channels
and stops the smock and linger of pond racket,
less water spreads across floodplains, less plants
root, edgewater flowers not stationed to bloom,
less birdsong, less chatter, less surface skimmer,
less water stored underground, less summer
seepage, more fire, less swamp, less leaf-huddle,
stick hovel, less hidey-holes for native fish, less
sediment, less firmament, less space for Sockeye
who spend half their lives in fresh streams, who
need deep slow water to hide from predators
and feast, to rest from raging spring currents,
less silver-maroon braids of water & matter, less
refuge, less salmon, who in a healthy river have
so little chance to survive the run, and when the
slick runs overfast, life is chased right out of it,
and when beavers cannot be restored quickly
enough to their woodsy-banksy lives—those
sweet-hunkered fiberworkers crafting detritus
into lattice and cave—whose communal busying
changes time-flow into longshore drift and spawn,
the water stops breaking, the soil-rich pools empty,
the salmon the salmon the salmon the salmon
less full less welcome, less shallows for thousands
of eggs laid in redds, less silt for young who grow
under gravel, so that beaver “analogs” mimic
their structures, beavers without beavers, restoring
riparian dams so the waters might wait for the
furred sod-lifters to return to the river’s lap and
grind and gather—hear it—so the Sockeye will
continue on, the Sockeye who are sometimes swiped
by bear paws and taken deep into wood, and who
then feed the forest, their nitrogen found in the salt
heart of the Sempervirens.

https://www.wayfarermagazine.com/p/slowing-down-the-river

Toshi doshi ya

A poem by Basho

(tr. RH. Blyth)

Toshi doshi ya
saru ni kisetaru
saru no men

Year after year
on the monkey’s face
a monkey face

“Mask” some have translated that second monkey face, and yes, sure, but I like the helplessness of that there-I-am-again-in-the-mirror sigh. The slight recoil from an unexpected self in the plate glass window. For are we not unknown even to ourselves?

Walter Benjamin sees in Klee’s “angelus novus,” its nervous eyes, an angel with the past wrecked at its feet, its back to the future. Because who can look at what the face becomes, the one coming, not the old frown-worn, judgey-mouthed, jowly-throated, the Dutch cheekbones broad as a tidal flat, mustache of my black-Irish aunt, but the wide-eyed terrored face of tomorrow, how the world leans on the face, making it a rumpled pillow, and then whatever’s next and its imprint.

Angel, don’t try to hide it with your infernal flapping wings. Step aside so I may see tomorrow’s monkey face, the past reflected behind me in future’s terrible mirror. We will laugh and laugh.

I threw my voice

I found myself trying to write about something, which is always a mistake. I lose all grace and instead plod along in earnest prose making some painstaking point painfully and yet missing it. Missing the point, which is not a point but a wave, or a confusion of waves, or an eddy of points and waves, or some such unutterable thing because if it were utterable I would have just said it but instead mumbled this other obvious blather, feeling virtuous and knowing. It’s the not-knowing. It’s always the not-knowing. So I have to begin again, and move beyond my knowing, into and into and into the question. What is the question? Well, that is often the question. I’ll take a breather and move back into this about-thing some other day, less gray and dismal, less in the deadzone that is the last week of the calendar year. Maybe January will inch me closer to some words and some image that might indicate the question, so I can leave behind in 2025 that poor, earnest knowitall who is myself.

Here’s a poem by Ted Mathys that I found in the Bennington Review that I admire for its confusions, its play, its distracted looking about, and how it stumbles down the page, as we do along the sidewalk on any given day, finding recollections, losing track, having conversations in your head.

Fluencies

Ted Mathys

I am a person
on whom nothing is lost.
By whom it’s been lost,
the nothing, I’m unsure.
Like a suntan it just
appeared on my arms.
Now I carry nothing
beneath my routine.
When I place a cabbage
in the shopping cart
nothing mimics the gesture.
Nothing sleeps as I sleep.
I never ask after its owner
because nothing is an echo
that will, given time,
reinfect the source.

She gave me
the cold shoulder.
I cradled it in my palms
like an ostrich egg.
I knew I was to protect it
until she gave the word.
When she gave the word
I placed the word
along with the shoulder
in a small cooler
with an ice pack
and took it to the pier
jutting into the lake.
I removed my feet
from my shoes,
the shoulder from its cooler.
I let the sun go to work
but kept the word on ice.

I jumped the gun
I found in a cornfield.
Winchester lever-action
rifle with wooden stock,
it rested in a furrow
between shorn stalks.
I got a running start
and when I leapt
I saw in the distance
a scarecrow, mouth sewn
into disfigurement,
staring back.

I threw my voice
in a tight spiral
from my spot on the field
toward an older man,
a version of myself
idle in the end zone,
hands in the air.
My voice arced
over fresh cut turf,
its spinning laces
speaking in tongues.
He caught the answer
to a question I lack
the language to ask.

I ran out of time
to say what I meant
so kept running
until I entered
a vacant space
faceted by blue light.
It was once a parlor
where moods were kept.
Solemnity, irreverence,
sadness, too.
I searched for self-
delusion, as if it were
a mood and not,
as I knew, a condition.
But the parlor
had been swept clear
into mineral-blue
absorbing distance.

https://www.benningtonreview.org/fourteen-mathys

I eat the many possibilities

The other day I found myself a bit overwhelmed with my dead. It must have been the coming-on of Christmas, hanging ornaments on the tree that made me think of me and my little mom doing that together. A guy running in the park put me in mind of my brother. Some guy’s facial expression on TV made me think of Dave. I’m shopping for new skis, which made me think of Art, who would have had what I wanted and would have given me a discount. I heard myself say in my head “Oh…mygod,” just the way Emma used to say it. And I’m glad not to be once again wrangling with Kathy about not wanting her to give me a gift but her wanting to give me a gift so me trying to come up with something I wanted and then having to come up with a gift for her. Geesh, woman, give it a rest. And she did.

And I felt bereft, a word that to me feels like a sort of dignified sadness, with its measured e’s balanced on either side of the fulcrum of r, and that efficient ft cutting off any great show of grief. So I walked bereft in the gray wind. But then solstice, and the coming-on of light, bit by bit. And someone told me the stars are aligned in some way that only happens during times of great change.

And so I resolve to stay present, both with my dead and with my living. Both so surprisingly full of light. And here is a poem by Kathleen Lynch that cracks me up. And isn’t that what we want art to do, crack us up a little bit.

Why I Love Oysters

Kathleen Lynch

Their tiny three-chambered
hearts, their colorless
translucent blood…

I love that they are true hermaphrodites,
tiny gonads surrounding digestive
organs like a ring of peeled grapelets,
apt to change sex one or more times
during an oceanic life.

Thus I am able to take both male
and female into my body whole
knowing as they slide into me
I eat the many possibilities

of sex, and it tastes like ocean
and body juices and I feel like a true
pure beast on the earth.

Bring them to me alive, sapid
in their nacre cups, aswim in their
liquor–with perhaps a dash of mignonette–
their throb bodies still humming.

When I tilt one in, life
and death will exist
in my mouth together,
as they will when
I inhale my last
unimaginable
breath.

Sneak Peek from Always With the Questions!: One Poet’s Writing Manual

Here’s another brief excerpt from my new book, available from The Word Works (wordworksbooks.org) or from Bookshop.org. Every section ends with a writing or revision prompt. Nudge nudge. This would be a fun gift for your writing group, some games to play to liven things up a bit. Or a gift to yourself — a little company along the lonely road.

II. Do Be Do Be Do; or, the Power and Necessity of Active Verbs

I was listening to someone read a short fiction piece recently and was struck at the leap in power when she came to a character’s gesture. For all the loveliness of the prose telling who, why, and where, it was the act of the characters—he reached toward her throat, she grabbed after the falling ring—that caught and carried the energy of the piece. Someone else read a poem and again, it was not the abstract nouns, for all their romantic evocations, that contained the poem’s gravitas, but the verb that snapped out and struck.

I just read Robert MacFarlane’s Landmarks, a wonderful book about books and words, specifically words of regional dialect that describe things specific to regional experiences: how the fog creeps across the moor, the way certain rock formations sparkle, how the regular passage of a small animal through a hedge creates a hole. Worlds and worlds, words and worlds.

I think of Rilke in “Ninth Elegy”: Maybe we are here to say: house, bridge, fountain, gate, pitcher, fruit, tree, window…. (Well, is the best translation “pitcher”? Or is is it “jug”? “Carafe”?) Looking through my recent drafts I think I’ve gone slack with language.

Good writing demands strong verbs, motion, gestures. Power lurks in the acts of the hands, the body, the feet, trunk or petal, wing or Mack truck. Don’t give me love. Give me the actions that love compels.

*

Examine all the verbs in your draft, and act to wake up those verbs, make them carry more weight, move with more gravitas or fleetness.

the eloquent purple, those heart shaped leaves

I’m bemused by how social media is filled with people who are convinced I’m doing some simple thing wrong — tying my scarf, cleaning my toilet, how I’m pronouncing a word — and assuring me that they know how to do it properly and they will tell me. I’m bewildered that the individual and collective response to such posts is not “who the fuck are you?”, rather, people seem to hit the “follow” button and spend a few minutes + a few minutes + a few minutes to learn random stuff from random people being cute in front of a camera. The ubiquitous camera. I guess we are a species eager for our own betterment. Eager to understand how best to play the game, all the games of life. It’s sweet, I guess. All our stumbling around doing the best we can, secretly sure there’s some secret to life we have not yet learned. Is this how you do it? Is this? So many things to learn, so many ways to do things incorrectly. So many “opportunities for improvement,” as some old job review form used to state.

I love art for its embrace of the not-knowing. That sense sometimes of sliding one foot forward slowly in the dark, then the other; or of feeling along the wall for a light switch. I know it’s here somewhere. I like that the advice offered in poems can be both wise and suspect, both silly and true. Can be understood by the body, but not necessarily by the brain. Yes, something in me says. Yes, that’s true, even as the rational brain may say, Now, wait a minute, hold on here, what’s this now? And I appreciate artists who speak out of the not-knowing, the I’m-not-sure. The artists who say, Let me show you what I saw, tell you what I heard, and you decide: what does it mean?

Here is a poem by Carol Graser from her new book from Kelsay, Prayer for the Sorrowful Brain.

In Congress Park on a Lunch Break from a Job in Retail

Carol Graser

Hundreds of white clover are flowering
with purpose. Each small head jiggles

in the breeze and I tell them about the patch
of violets I mow around each summer

that is wider every spring. I tell them
because they’re listening about the manager

and her imperious clothes, about her assistant
who picks at her loose threads, drapes

them like a veil over his dusty head
They tell me in their chirping voices

to hold that patch of violets close to me
the eloquent purple, those heart shaped leaves

But the owner, I shriek, he travels to Tibet
to meditate on his choice of good fortune

Their green voices ripple with tiny urgency
Our thin roots listen when the cold stone speaks

The breeze picks up, ruffling their spiky petals
Let the hair on your skin listen now

the future I’m reaching for

I woke remembering a couple of anxiety dreams. I do not know why I’m anxious, but it came out in fear and anger and confusion, a bit of panic in my dreams. I let coffee and the sky wash me of it, and can now just be bemused at the mind, its mysterious wrinkles, actual and metaphorical. Snowdust has fallen in the night and the weatherpeople are all aflutter about a possible storm acomin’. I only know this because internet cookies have tattled to my social media that I check Weather Underground every day, so my feed includes random weatherpeople from around the country, all looking for attention through dire warnings and reminders to carry umbrellas, doubtless underwritten by big corporate umbrella makers. I only read the news — I don’t watch or listen to it — so I can take in the melodrama in measured glances, the calm of a punctuated sentence, a nicely contained paragraph. It occurs to me that life is that mix of unanticipated stimulation and the striving to make sense of it and react in some reasonable way that allows survival until the next surprise. Art is important to me both as stimulus and as companion on the path to survival. This poem by Peter Gizzi feels like good company today, as I stagger into the gray day with its subtly shifting clouds.

Inness

Peter Gizzi

look at this light the light said
what could it mean
a star gone to silence
in the late sky
a science of waves
O haunted mirror 
it’s been a while 
since I visited this place
I found it once
the future I’m reaching for
long past reliving
days turning
to see the sun 
rise and set in a galaxy 
inside billions of stars 
I found you 
falling lonely into light 
a fantastic red-orange gloaming
a phantom light that said
you will see greens 
you can only encounter here
I made this for you

https://www.hauserwirth.com/ursula/inness-peter-gizzi/

to hide the sound of the groaning enormity

In town, the morning’s ambient rumble: trucks and cars on the highway a mile away; somewhere incessant bulldozing or backfilling or some infernal earthworks even at this hour: 7:30am. The beep beep of backing up. We are as ants, we human movers, we shakers, doing and doing and being noisy about it. Last night some party in the neighborhood, college students’ booming music. Can’t we all just sit still, quiet for a time? I am weary. But there the insistent song of that tiny wren I see sometimes in the ivies. And a crow seems to reply. Quick zee of a jay in the arbor vitae. Why do I make hierarchies: some sounds over others? It’s my prejudice against my own kind, source of much of my anxiety. And my joy.

Frost left its edges on the deck and steps but I find a dry spot to sit, my coffee’s steam seeming to fill the gray sky. I try to still my mind’s constant conversation and just breathe in the damp cold, hear the barrage as individual songs, ignore the intrusion of should-have-cut-back-the-lavender, of next-year-I’ll-dig-up-the-lizard’s-tail. Study again the difficult present, amid the uncertainty of tomorrow, of the next hour, next minute. It takes work to be in the world like this. To be an extension of it, not a mover through it. But of course, I am both. As I am an impatient observer of my species, and inescapably, one and the same.

I admire this long poem by Barbara Tomash for its unreined wander but its careful containment too. There is no escaping itself.

to begin and end in the garden, slapping mosquitoes, reading her book

Barbara Tomash

White lily, red lily, azalea, camellia, wisteria, salvia, grape arbor, rose.

She checks anxiously on each plant, notes who is dead or barely surviving, who
is furiously blossoming and shooting up green for reasons she can’t fathom—

what if garden is a bed in straw, the steaming breath of animals,
a fever dream, a scarlet river restless inside its reflected sky, a
domed or tented place, an unnamed grief

or another negative space that hasn’t arrived yet, is arriving, did
(did not) arrive

what if a garden resists

*

First, these currents of air, this sun, these plants and their roots, the ghosts in
the walls, then if she can hear them, words. The ones she will allow—

She kicks away the fallen leaves as if searching for something lost. And so
losing it more completely?

What would it be like to say irretrievably? Or even, more irretrievably?

if she can bear it

*

She observes the gestures of her own hands, her walk, and breath, listens to
her own pulse and voice, the fascia sliding over her muscles, her tendons and
nerves—

how, without recourse to any sort of iconography,
to form a picture

no, a perfectly formed human body

to hold in mind an owl’s concentration on a mouse, the
green bark of an olive tree, the insects living there

the insects that will bring it down

*

A voice rises, calling over the play of small children. What does the repetition
of the vowel in no, no, no hope for?

leaves scattering                  

a line’s turbulence 

on laid paper

a source of crossing out

and finally,

I twist my heart
round again

the sound of sanding and sawing

orange towels hanging from yellow clothespins

swan-like cyclamen blossoms

*

One of the red cyclamens has spread itself open, stems softened, petals like
watercolors running. A strange corpse—not hard, desiccated, but instead
dismantled by too much water within.

She is preoccupied with touch, and its consequences—for example, the
yellow and purple mottling of a bruise, or the hardness of a dragonfly’s green
iridescent body which keeps her from feeling alone.

*

She doesn’t know the word for this much green. But she reads that Hildegard
von Bingen, in the 12th century, took a word right out of its Latin frame—

viriditas:
greenness

and made it to mean:the soul is a tree unfolding the feminine
aspect of God


green is green is green is

Green is. And she is scraping it off the garden bricks with her trowel—
intricate patterns of mold glowing. Green. Not an image. Not a word.

She notices a small tear at the armpit of her dress where her movements have
strained the fabric, an arrow-shape pointing at her

as if she were an actual green leaf, or a scarab

digging in the garden, and the mosquitoes buzzing

yes, she must give even these their due—

from now on, I would stand outside myself, watch over and
observe myself

to make herself known or unknown
to hide the sound of the groaning enormity

*

On the windowsill an old bird’s nest straggling. Long grasses unwoven from the
ball of nest are evidence of work well done

to paint the walls with beautiful pictures

then, as our grandmothers taught us
to spit three times into the palm of our hand

we all make things and what we make places us
in the light of our mothers

giving birth, giving death—one and the same time

*

A spider weaves a web of holes, mapping a pattern of air.

how very small. how small?

I held out my hand as if to ward off a blow.

there is no way to write about how delicate is our need.

*

There’s an image inside the wrecked cyclamen which she can’t quite
decipher—red petals becoming pale and translucent, melting in the sun,
dripping on the terrazzo.

She waters the plant, though she knows this instinct is wrong.

—As for me, I’ve lost my own image.

*

She stands in the dusk watching the shadow the pink rose casts on the wall
becoming diffuse and finally erased, a mere chalk mark, the actual, discernable,
physical thing merging with darkness, or with the few remaining, intensifying
streaks of light

and she looks for one more way to repent time—

she meant to say represent

meant to say time the body takes up, takes in, when all that is given is
a simple absolute. She refuses to say the word.

She wants to say translucency translates time

and not be told to stop.


Note: Lines in italics are quoted from the writings of Anne Frank, Simone de
Beauvoir, and Emma Goldman

be visited by a dream of the world as kind

This morning I took my coffee to the yard in the cold and admired the rime on the edge of the leaves, but neighbor Darla spied me and barked. “It’s just me, you idiot,” I whispered in the 7:30 a.m. quiet. Bark bark. “Darla, shut up, it’s just me.” Bark bark. “It’s my fucking yard, you little jerk.” Bar… Darla’s housekeeper stuck her head out to call her in. I waved over the bushes so she’d know Darla was barking at me, whom she knows perfectly well, and not some backyard intruder. We all went quiet again.

Some days I feel I’m getting quieter and quieter. Have less that demands to be barked anywhere outside my head, or less worth saying, less worth the effort toward affecting the world order, or the small world, anyway, in which I roam. I’m a wizard, often, at conversing. The idle chitchat I can do when required. I don’t mind small talk. (I don’t trust people who do. It is a small courtesy in an often discourteous world, this world of humans we cannot escape.) But I’m more apt these days to remain quiet. Sometimes it feels like a defeat. Other times it feels like new wisdom. Both could be true, of course, depending on the context of my silence. Some silence is a being-with, some is a withdrawal-from. Some verbiage is a combat. Some a defense. Some a nervous habit. More and more I am trying to learn all the differences among the types of talk and the sorts of silences. More and more I am trying to empathize with each. Even Darla, the little jerk, who I guess is just trying to keep tabs on her neighborhood, just trying to keep everything at bay.

Here’s a funny poem by Mark Doty about his dog’s attempt to maintain the world order. Darla and I sympathize.

Little George

Mark Doty

                                   barks at whatever’s
not the world as he prefers to know it:
trash sacks, hand trucks, black hats, canes
and hoods, shovels, someone smoking a joint
beneath the Haitian Evangelicals’ overhang,
anyone—how dare they—walking a dog.
George barks, the tense white comma
of himself arced in alarm.
                                                   At home he floats
in the creaturely domestic: curled in the warm
triangle behind a sleeper’s knees,
wiggling on his back on the sofa, all jelly
and sighs, requesting/receiving a belly rub.
No worries. But outside the apartment’s
metal door, the unmanageable day assumes
its blurred and infinite disguises.
                                                                 Best to bark.
No matter that he’s slightly larger
than a toaster; he proceeds as if he rules
a rectangle two blocks deep, bounded west
and east by Seventh Avenue and Union Square.
Whatever’s there is there by his consent,
and subject to the rebuke of his refusal
—though when he asserts his will
he trembles. If only he were not solely
responsible for raising outcry
at any premonition of trouble
on West 16th Street, or if, right out
on the pavement, he might lay down
the clanking armor of his bluster.

Some evening when he’s climbed the stairs
after our late walk, and rounds
the landing’s turn and turns his way
toward his steady sleep, I wish he might
be visited by a dream of the world as kind,
how any looming unknown might turn out
to hold—the April-green of an unsullied
tennis ball? Dear one, surely the future
can’t be entirely out to get us?
And if it is, barking won’t help much.

But no such luck, not yet.
He takes umbrage, this morning,
at a stone image serene in a neighbor’s garden,
and stiffens and fixes and sounds
his wild alarm: Damn you,
Buddha, get out of here, go away!

Excerpt from my new book: Always With the Questions!: One Poet’s Writing Manual

IV. Very Well Then I Contradict Myself; on the First Person Perspective in Poems

I have worried sometimes about my use of “I” in poems. The “I” is certainly not always me; sometimes it is a character or a handy perspective point for the observations around which it is wrapped, a simple first-person eye-to-the-telescope. The tricky thing with the “I” is that often for an effective poem, the “I” can’t be too full of itself. It can stand in the way of the reader.

Sometimes the “I” is useful for starting a poem, but then it might need to be edited out as, in the writing, the poem becomes more about what that “I” saw than the “I” seeing. What is the correct balance for an effective poem between the “I” doing the seeing and the thing seen? If the “I” is needed, there needs to be enough transparency in the “I” that it can easily become you-the-reader.

This makes me think of a larger philosophical question about the self. This is the wonderful writer Olivia Laing from her book To the River: “…is it not necessary to dissolve the self if one hopes to see the world unguarded?” 

It occurs to me that to make good art, there does need to be a dissolution of the “I” but then possibly its re-creation as a vehicle for the art, an eye for the seeing. Which makes me think about a rhetorical question posed in an introduction to a poet at a reading I went to recently, a question I thought was supremely dumb. The introducer asked: “Are all poems self-portraits?” Of course they are/are not and what’s your point? Of course they are a product of wild imagination shaped by the individual experiences of the writer, and a fake wig and glasses, or stripped down to nude and dancing a watusi. I mean, really…

You can order the book from WordWorksBooks.org.