I mean that the chatbot and the human brain may be running the same algorithm at a certain level of abstraction and then it's cognitively the same event but not physically. One may be an experience the other may not. Therefore, talking about phenomenonal consciousness is about physics rather than cognition.
I have a metaphysics article scheduled for March 16th. Various levels of description capture various real patterns. There is a level of description for capturing experience/consciousness.
No way. A pen and pencil instantiation is ontologically equivalent to a computer program?
An instantiation is not a program. Pen and pencil are not equivalent to a silicon chip computer, but there is just one program.
I mean that the chatbot and the human brain may be running the same algorithm at a certain level of abstraction and then it's cognitively the same event but not physically. One may be an experience the other may not. Therefore, talking about phenomenonal consciousness is about physics rather than cognition.
I have a metaphysics article scheduled for March 16th. Various levels of description capture various real patterns. There is a level of description for capturing experience/consciousness.