GOD'S CREATION = 100 / evolution = 0
“Trust the science” has become a demand for blind obedience, not a call for honest inquiry. Science is a method, not an unquestionable authority—but it is often wielded to enforce claims that rely on assumptions, ideology, or selective evidence. Money and institutional pressures shape what is promoted and what is ignored. The same authority asserts sweeping ideas about origins—like evolution and the Big Bang—as if beyond question, even though the fossil record contains glaring gaps, the complexity of biological systems defies purely random processes, and cosmological models rely on unobservable assumptions. This isn’t a rejection of science; it’s a rejection of blind trust. When “science” is used to silence dissent and push a secular narrative, it stops being science and becomes ideology in a lab coat.
“Trust the science” has become a demand for blind obedience, not a call for honest inquiry. Science is a method, not an unquestionable authority—but it is often wielded to enforce claims that rely on assumptions, ideology, or selective evidence. Money and institutional pressures shape what is promoted and what is ignored. The same authority asserts sweeping ideas about origins—like evolution and the Big Bang—as if beyond question, even though the fossil record contains glaring gaps, the complexity of biological systems defies purely random processes, and cosmological models rely on unobservable assumptions. This isn’t a rejection of science; it’s a rejection of blind trust. When “science” is used to silence dissent and push a secular narrative, it stops being science and becomes ideology in a lab coat.
GOD'S CREATION = 100 / evolution = 0
“Trust the science” has become a demand for blind obedience, not a call for honest inquiry. Science is a method, not an unquestionable authority—but it is often wielded to enforce claims that rely on assumptions, ideology, or selective evidence. Money and institutional pressures shape what is promoted and what is ignored. The same authority asserts sweeping ideas about origins—like evolution and the Big Bang—as if beyond question, even though the fossil record contains glaring gaps, the complexity of biological systems defies purely random processes, and cosmological models rely on unobservable assumptions. This isn’t a rejection of science; it’s a rejection of blind trust. When “science” is used to silence dissent and push a secular narrative, it stops being science and becomes ideology in a lab coat.
0 Comments
0 Shares
12 Views